3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

11.78@116 MPH on stock twins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-02, 09:26 AM
  #76  
Apexsealistically Chalngd

iTrader: (4)
 
VTECthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 476
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
now just swap those PFS parts out for some apexi parts and youll go mid 11's.
Rob
93 base
T-72BB/haltech
Old 09-26-02, 02:42 PM
  #77  
Rotary Freak

 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: l.a.
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by jspecracer7


Sure...how about YOU take your own advice.

I've seen cars tuned 10.9:1 and boosting 1.2 kg/cm2 on 102 octane blow engine's...and you want to run 12:1
yeah, but i can turn that around and say that even when you do run rich and have a high octane gas you can still detonate. so what would be your advise to this guy, run even richer? all i'm saying is it's perfectly fine to run rich, just don't expect to make gobs of power, especially on stock twins. it's a tradeoff btwn reliability and power. but my point is running richer than 12:1 gets you about a hairs worth of extra protection, you can still blow pretty easily as your example has proven. imo, the richer and richer you run you get to a point of diminishing returns, where you lose a lot of power and gain very little protection. it's like upgrading to 3mm seals, people still blow their engines all the time with these. and we all know about the never ending 2 vs 3mm debate. our motors can't take detonation period, if we want that extra protection then we should go out and buy supras.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
28
04-14-16 12:58 PM
ncds_fc
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
17
09-10-15 03:52 AM



Quick Reply: 11.78@116 MPH on stock twins



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM.