2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

When is bigger not better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-05, 08:16 AM
  #1  
MLC
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
MLC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb When is bigger not better

OK is bigger really better I am getting my custom exhaust done this weekend and I want 3' all the way But is that a little over kill what do you guys and Gals think ? What are the disadvantages and the advantages? Thxs
Old 11-18-05, 08:19 AM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
MountainTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Utah (land of mountains)
Posts: 515
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbo car? NA? Mods?
Old 11-18-05, 08:22 AM
  #3  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
3 feet???


-Ted
Old 11-18-05, 08:24 AM
  #4  
MLC
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
MLC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry

Sorry its a 89 rx7 vert NA running about 50 shot of nos, custom cold air induction, and Jet V force computer
thxs
Old 11-18-05, 08:25 AM
  #5  
Alcohol Fueled!

iTrader: (2)
 
J-Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hood River oregon
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Then bigger isnt necessarily better..
Old 11-18-05, 08:46 AM
  #6  
Squeak, Suicide Girls

 
tjgosurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That 3' exhaust maybe overkill. I would try 3"
Old 11-18-05, 09:51 AM
  #7  
Ready to Rock

 
ultradef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tjgosurf
That 3' exhaust maybe overkill. I would try 3"
LOL

Actually, for an NA I would stick with 2.5"...just my opinion.
Old 11-18-05, 10:15 AM
  #8  
numba 1 stunna

 
88mazdarx7turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Crestline, Ohio
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tjgosurf
That 3' exhaust maybe overkill. I would try 3"

lmao such ****** these days... but yea u shouldnt go with 3 u should go 2 1/2 feet with 5 feet wide CHROME exhaust tips.. o yea
Old 11-18-05, 10:39 AM
  #9  
Squeak, Suicide Girls

 
tjgosurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I take teh funnay where i can get it.
Old 11-18-05, 11:07 AM
  #10  
resU deretsigeR

iTrader: (3)
 
jkimbro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Yep
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MLC
Sorry its a 89 rx7 vert NA running about 50 shot of nos, custom cold air induction, and Jet V force computer
thxs

You're running "about" a 50 shot. Not really sure?
Old 11-18-05, 12:02 PM
  #11  
Full Member

 
tonybcrazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Sticks Maine
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 1/2 inch should be good for up to about 325 horsepower. 3" would just be over killer and add extra weight. I am pretty sure a 3" is good for up to like 800-1000hp. I know some guys that tried a 4" exhaust but that was on a supra making like over 1200 hp. If you still want to brag about having a 3" exhaust start the system at 2 1/2 at the engine an expand as it goes back. Thats really how an exhaust system should be designed. Hot gasses dont need as large of pipes because they still have high pressure which leads to better flow. As the gas cools looses pressure and slows down it needs a bigger pipe to travel through.
Old 11-18-05, 03:31 PM
  #12  
Full Member

 
InGroundEffect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would not put a 3" system on an N/A. That is good for a turbo because backpressure is created by the turbo, then the turbo needs to push the exhaust out as fast as possible.

A N/A engine needs some back pressure in the exhaust and a full 3" would not have enough restriction.

I am currently building a custom 2.5" single exhaust for mine and 2.5" is still very big for the displacement of our engines.
Old 11-18-05, 05:06 PM
  #13  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Madrx7racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
agree with 2.5..........i did 2 1/4
Old 11-18-05, 05:12 PM
  #14  
Law Breaker

 
Carzy Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: S.F. Bay Area, California 510
Posts: 3,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2.5" cause 3" is overkill
Old 11-18-05, 05:13 PM
  #15  
Squeak, Suicide Girls

 
tjgosurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by InGroundEffect
I would not put a 3" system on an N/A. That is good for a turbo because backpressure is created by the turbo, then the turbo needs to push the exhaust out as fast as possible.

A N/A engine needs some back pressure in the exhaust and a full 3" would not have enough restriction.

I am currently building a custom 2.5" single exhaust for mine and 2.5" is still very big for the displacement of our engines.
That ugly rumor comes up again. Backpressure is not needed for an engine to run. Prove it, either with a dyno or mathmatically.
Old 11-18-05, 09:23 PM
  #16  
MLC
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
MLC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Ok I think ill go with 2.5 thxs
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
06-03-24 03:25 PM
Rotate86
Single Turbo RX-7's
5
05-18-18 02:44 PM
Turblown
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
09-30-15 05:58 PM
pfsantos
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
09-30-15 01:29 PM



Quick Reply: When is bigger not better



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 AM.