2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

What are the consequences of removing the Charcoal Canister...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-03, 12:18 PM
  #26  
REINCARNATED

iTrader: (4)
 
Relisys190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: South Eastern USA
Posts: 1,645
Received 141 Likes on 99 Posts
But there are two lines going into the top of the canister.

One large tube and one smaller tube. Can you just safely cap both of those off? I extended both lines and ran them under the car .. but i would like to cap the lines off at the source... just for simplicity

let me know
thanks
-Markus
Old 05-05-03, 01:22 PM
  #27  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)
 
cbrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: MI 48111
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the one goes to the intake manifold and can be capped. The other goes all the way back to the tank..which can be vented back there. In stock form the canister is the only way for the tank to vent...you still need a vent.
Old 09-09-03, 09:04 PM
  #28  
Full Member

 
chris wilcox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry that I haven't looked at the FSM in a while but do any of you suppose that this canister has something to do with the fuel smell in the oil. If the canister was full could gas somehow make it into the engine while parked? I am concerned with my oil since in gets very tihin and smells of fuel between changes. Only other thing I can think of is that it is leaky injectors dumping fuel into the manifold every time I shut the car off. I'm actually doing the fuel injector test as I type.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steelwheelz
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
09-15-15 03:22 PM



Quick Reply: What are the consequences of removing the Charcoal Canister...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13 PM.