2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

wastegate?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-03, 01:08 AM
  #1  
SUPRAMAN

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wastegate?

k
Old 01-22-03, 01:11 AM
  #2  
SOLD THE RX-7!

 
Scott 89t2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
?
Old 01-22-03, 01:12 AM
  #3  
SUPRAMAN

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i decided to not be lazy and do a search first but i didn't find anything. What the hell does a wastegate do. god it's such a noob question i hate to ask.
Old 01-22-03, 01:15 AM
  #4  
SOLD THE RX-7!

 
Scott 89t2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.1300cc.com/howto/how2/turbo.htm
Old 01-22-03, 01:18 AM
  #5  
Full Member

 
inboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The wastegate 'short-circuits' the turbo so it makes less boost. Just think of it as a controlled exhuast leak around the turbine section of a turbocharger. If the exhuast goes around the turbo instead of through it then the turbo spins slower and consequently makes less boost.
Old 01-22-03, 01:18 AM
  #6  
Keep Right Except to Pass

 
HeffBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"The most popular method of controlling turbocharger speed" Hugh MacInnes quote.
Old 01-22-03, 01:22 AM
  #7  
SUPRAMAN

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so that's why i only have 8psi? So is basically keeps boost spiking down and for me to get more boost i will need a boost controller?
Old 01-22-03, 01:35 AM
  #8  
Full Member

 
inboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In a nutshell, yes

Now for reality:

1) If you're running a stock turbo you're already falling off the peak efficiency islands on the compressor map at 8 psi. This means higher discharge temps and lower flow rates. The result is higher pressure but less power and more danger of detonation

2) The factory intercooler is at best a restriction and more like an interheater. When you try and push even more air mass through this thing which will be much hotter than the stock boost level it was designed to >try< and cool you'll lose boost and continue to deliver air that is much too hot to the engine

3) If you're running the stock ECU it will fuel cut before you get any more boost. If you fool the factory ECU with a fuel cut defenser (FCD) then you will ultimatley destroy your engine as it leans out because the factory ECU had no idea how much boost was actually in the manifold. This is because the FCD fools the computer into thinking there is never more than about 5psi boost.

Now's a good time to do a search on fuel systems, turbo upgrades, intercoolers, and second mortgages!

Old 01-22-03, 01:39 AM
  #9  
Super Newbie

 
Felix Wankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by RX7withNitrous
so that's why i only have 8psi? So is basically keeps boost spiking down and for me to get more boost i will need a boost controller?
Yeah, since you haev an external wastegate, they use a spring to set the tension. With the reference line hooked to the manifold, the most you will get is 8 psi with the particular spring you have. You won't get more without a boost controller.

But you need the ECU and injectors for big boost now, then throw the boost controller at it and you'll have a damn fast car.
Old 01-22-03, 01:46 AM
  #10  
...

 
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone have any idea how low a ported stock S4 wastegate can keep boost down to? Just ported as best as it can be, not adding a different flapper or anything. Thanks.
Old 01-22-03, 01:49 AM
  #11  
Super Newbie

 
Felix Wankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I had one with a stock flapper, but a clipped tubine wheel. It would do about 6 psi, and creep to about 8-9 in 5th. I imagine a stock wheel would be a psi or two higher.
Old 01-22-03, 01:50 AM
  #12  
Keep Right Except to Pass

 
HeffBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you're running a stock turbo you're already falling off the peak efficiency islands on the compressor map at 8 psi.
Where did you find the stock maps? I would really like to see them.
Old 01-22-03, 01:57 AM
  #13  
...

 
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Felix Wankel
I had one with a stock flapper, but a clipped tubine wheel. It would do about 6 psi, and creep to about 8-9 in 5th. I imagine a stock wheel would be a psi or two higher.
Well its not the stock turbine wheel, its a P-trim one I guess. Has a T04B compressor housing and compressor wheel and a 360 dgree thrust bearing.
Old 01-22-03, 02:03 AM
  #14  
Full Member

 
inboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to lead you on like that, I don't have them. I am making an educated guess (which I think you will find most turbo shops will agree with). The stock turbo was definately optimized to give better part throttle response and an early peak in the torque curve. If you look at a plot of boost vs. RPM on the stock car it always falls off after about 5000. This could be just as much a turbine related effect but I think the general consensus is that the stock compressor section is pretty lousy at doing anything more than about 8 psi. This is why I'm interested in the T04B hybrid stuff that many people offer. Stock turbine, much improved compressor section!
Old 01-22-03, 02:14 AM
  #15  
Super Newbie

 
Felix Wankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Ryde _Or_Die
Well its not the stock turbine wheel, its a P-trim one I guess. Has a T04B compressor housing and compressor wheel and a 360 dgree thrust bearing.
Man there is really no telling, you have to machine out the turbine housing for a P-trim, and it depends on who does it and how much they do it. i'd think with that kind of mods one would want to put a better flapper door on though.
Old 01-22-03, 03:53 AM
  #16  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by inboost
If you're running the stock ECU it will fuel cut before you get any more boost.
The ECU cuts fuel at 8.6psi boost.
If you fool the factory ECU with a fuel cut defenser (FCD) then you will ultimatley destroy your engine as it leans out because the factory ECU had no idea how much boost was actually in the manifold.
That's a wee bit dramatic. For starters the pressure sensor does not affect fuelling, it affects ignition timing. As manifold pressure increases, the ignition is retarded to avoid detonation. But like most factory tuning there's a significant safety factor built in, so running slightly more ignition advance due to the FCD is not going to destroy your engine. Mild boost increases with an FCD are fine, and many people happily run 10psi boost (with the right amount of fuel of course) without problems. Any more than this and you're asking for trouble though, especially with the stock intercooler, because intake temps will be starting to get pretty high due to the turbo running well past its efficiency peak.
This is because the FCD fools the computer into thinking there is never more than about 5psi boost.
Again, not quite right. Decent FCD's allow the pressure sensor signal to be sent to the ECU unaltered until just before fuel cut, and then clamp the voltage. So the ECU thinks it's running just over 8psi, not 5psi.
Old 01-22-03, 09:01 AM
  #17  
Full Member

 
jeyjey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
boost control

In my opinion all you need is a

phase 1 linear chip
phase 2 adj boost contoller
these two items were designed just for the TII you will not need fuel pump,injectors,FCD or wastegate mods. All you need is a TII then exhaust system and change your panel filter then the above two mods.

10psi no problems
Old 01-22-03, 12:25 PM
  #18  
Full Member

 
inboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NZ Vert: Very interesting!

I'd like to know how you came up with "For starters the pressure sensor does not affect fuelling". I'm only skeptical because of what I see in the FSM.

If this is correct, then base fueling is provided by the air flow meter. The bummer is that the air flow meter will also ultimately be a restriction as it will only be able to report a volumetric flow up to it's mechincal stop. Once your air demand exceeds the measureable flow capacity of the AFM you'll be just as hosed.

On my 89 S5 T2 I see the AFM reporting high volts at idle and low volts at high flow. At key-on with no engine rotation I see 3.850 volts, which would be the least amount of flow. At the lowest voltage (6000RPM 6psi boost) I see about 0.320 volts. If the sensor can report all the way to zero volts (doubt it) then we would at best be allowed about 8.3% more flow. I suspect just a few PSI can do this without too much effort.

With respect to the FCD: I've got an HKS unit here that someone gave me that puts a 'knee' in the output at 2 volts changing the slope from that point on. My stock MAP sensor delivers kPa=Volts*43.21+3.566 so that puts me at about 90kPa which is still in vacuum when the thing kicks in. I definately don't like that!
Old 01-22-03, 01:51 PM
  #19  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by inboost
I'd like to know how you came up with "For starters the pressure sensor does not affect fuelling". I'm only skeptical because of what I see in the FSM.
Several people have posted results from dyno testing this by using a little hand vac pump attached to the pressure sensor to send fake pressure signals to the ECU. Changing the pressure seen by the sensor didn't alter fuel injector pulsewidths, but did change ignition timing.
If this is correct, then base fueling is provided by the air flow meter.
Correct.
With respect to the FCD: I've got an HKS unit here that someone gave me that puts a 'knee' in the output at 2 volts changing the slope from that point on. My stock MAP sensor delivers kPa=Volts*43.21+3.566 so that puts me at about 90kPa which is still in vacuum when the thing kicks in. I definately don't like that!
Have a read of this. Not all FCD's are created equal.
Old 01-23-03, 12:01 AM
  #20  
Full Member

 
inboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NZ vert,

I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree on the MAP sensor only changing timing. I ran a little test tonight on the way home. I put the car in 5th gear on the freeway at about 70 miles an hour and floored it while I datalogged the ECU's flounderings. Remember this is a series 5 turbo II that is bone stock save for my data logging equipment.



As you can see there is a direct relationship between the MAP sensor and pulse width. The AFM volts hardly change during this plus 9 psi spike below the secondary injection turn-on point.

I suspect this is where most people 'pop' their motors as the boost rises quite high due to the load and much too soon before the secondary injectors can help do anything about it. In this particular episode my primary injectors were at 74.3% duty cycle (~15mS) at peak boost of 9.5 psi. Notice how the stock S5 wastegate control is very sluggish at beating the spike and also returning me to 8 psi of boost. The good news is that the A/F ratio is PIG rich anyway at 11:1
Old 01-23-03, 12:26 AM
  #21  
SOLD THE RX-7!

 
Scott 89t2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ummmmm how did you datalog a stock ECU??? and why havn't you told anyone about this before??
Old 01-23-03, 09:30 AM
  #22  
Full Member

 
inboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Scott 89T2,

I basically spliced into all the factory sensors at the ECU and I'm borrowing some equipment to monitor what the factory ECU does. It was a lot of work to get running and is what I'd consider way past the budget and skill level of the average person. I'm just lucky to be able to borrow this stuff! I'm also a long way from being 'done' so that's why I've not said anything. My goal is to reverse engineer the factory ECU enough to program a stand-alone fuel/igntion system to mimick it (for smog purposes) and also to improve upon it (for smiles-per-hour).
Old 01-23-03, 09:46 AM
  #23  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
White_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So if this is true then, and the preas. sensor is the main load sensor, why the hell would they have the AFM. Also why did my car run fine with the preas. sensor disconnected? my car is N/A, but i'm sure the ecu acts the same way as a TII though.
Old 01-23-03, 12:06 PM
  #24  
Brother of the Rotary

iTrader: (2)
 
eViLRotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arkham Asylum
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by inboost
Scott 89T2,

I basically spliced into all the factory sensors at the ECU and I'm borrowing some equipment to monitor what the factory ECU does. It was a lot of work to get running and is what I'd consider way past the budget and skill level of the average person. I'm just lucky to be able to borrow this stuff! I'm also a long way from being 'done' so that's why I've not said anything. My goal is to reverse engineer the factory ECU enough to program a stand-alone fuel/igntion system to mimick it (for smog purposes) and also to improve upon it (for smiles-per-hour).
Cool ****, man!
Keep it up!
Old 01-23-03, 06:34 PM
  #25  
SUPRAMAN

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is there anyway i can turn my boost up by adjusting the wastegate?


Quick Reply: wastegate?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 PM.