2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

W00t?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-05, 10:54 PM
  #51  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
About damn time, would've been nice to have that **** when I was there. Like I said, i HATE ghetto rigging things.
Old 11-14-05, 10:55 PM
  #52  
Rockn' The Galant

Thread Starter
 
Tech_Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol thats how we do in Shreveport - jk...off to bed everyone enjoy the video more to come later.
Old 11-14-05, 11:28 PM
  #53  
Rockn' The Galant

Thread Starter
 
Tech_Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://media.putfile.com/RX7-SC-Uncompressed

Straight AVI Format, no compression, lack of sound is due to camera it self if it still doesnt sound good.
Old 11-15-05, 10:51 AM
  #54  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 110 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
There's nothing to fix short of getting rid of that kit, it specifically says right on their website to set it between 1500 and 1800 (once he fixes all the various vacuum leaks, such as the AFM coupler, intake bolts/studs, etc), it should go down lower, but I've never come accross one of these kits that will idle under 1200 (and even 1200 isn't stable)
Wow, I just looked at the site. I'm very disappointed that Atkins would produce something so....less then ideal.

From looking at their design, the high idle is easily explained.

1. Elimination of BAC
2. Number 1, coupled with the load generated by the supercharger
3. Elimination of the progressive throttle body design

You know this, but it's for the benefit of others reading this thread.
Old 11-15-05, 11:01 AM
  #55  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
Wow, I just looked at the site. I'm very disappointed that Atkins would produce something so....less then ideal.

From looking at their design, the high idle is easily explained.

1. Elimination of BAC
2. Number 1, coupled with the load generated by the supercharger
3. Elimination of the progressive throttle body design

You know this, but it's for the benefit of others reading this thread.
Oh there's so much more to it than that, if you ever look at the intake manifold design you'll die laughing, basically their manifold is a '3 port', it just has one large port that kind of covers the ports on the center iron (it doesn't cover them completely, IE the port is larger in height than the manifold), as well as that it's wider than the ports, which creates not only the divider between the ports, but also overhanging walls on each side for the air to crash into. The other ports are simply one larger tube formed into an oval that's sitting straight (not even slanted to account for the design of the irons ports), which creates the same effect, a LOT of the port isn't even used because it doesn't match, coupled with their placement running smack into the iron itself. (Sorry if the explination sounds like crap, if I could draw a picture you'd get the idea). It's really the most **** poor excuse for a supercharger setup I've seen since zzbrown's m90. And I won't even get started on the charger itself...

Kinda looks like this (ignore the craptastic MS paint job)
Where black is the actual engine ports, red being the camden manifold ports

Attached Thumbnails W00t?-wtfyo.jpg  

Last edited by SonicRaT; 11-15-05 at 11:09 AM.
Old 11-15-05, 11:12 AM
  #56  
Tear you apart

iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,882
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
Ewww!

.

At least Eric is happy.
Old 11-15-05, 11:43 AM
  #57  
Rockn' The Galant

Thread Starter
 
Tech_Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah...

The design's old, the manifold sucks but like I said it wasn't for the speed, it's not like I head out to the track all that oftne, mainly just to have a little fun on a cruise around town.

Yeah, I spent a good wad of cash on it, but it was for me, not anyone else..I can make an intake manifold at my stepdads shop down in Baton Rouge, it's just a matter of free time or get my stepdad to.

- Tech
Old 11-15-05, 12:37 PM
  #58  
What will I drive next?

 
Tessai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hrm, could this be why they only make 200 or so HP? I'd be curious as to how well they would perform with better manifolds.
Old 11-15-05, 12:42 PM
  #59  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It's a combination of a lot of things, terrible manifold design, VERY old charger technology, and etc.
Old 11-15-05, 12:46 PM
  #60  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Tech_Greek
Yeah...

The design's old, the manifold sucks but like I said it wasn't for the speed, it's not like I head out to the track all that oftne, mainly just to have a little fun on a cruise around town.

Yeah, I spent a good wad of cash on it, but it was for me, not anyone else..I can make an intake manifold at my stepdads shop down in Baton Rouge, it's just a matter of free time or get my stepdad to.

- Tech
Yeah, that's all that really matters, I just keep rambling on because a lot of people are misinformed or don't understand a lot of the things wrong with this setup, so the expect something completely different from what they get, at least you researched everything and decided.
Old 11-15-05, 01:41 PM
  #61  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 110 Likes on 93 Posts
Wow. Now that's just sloppy work...Looks almost like Atkins was not thinking in terms of fuel injection, but where just figuring "Do it like that because that's how we always used to do it with the carbs...".
Old 11-15-05, 01:56 PM
  #62  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The fuel injector location is pretty interesting as well, they're located on the side of the lower intake, facing directly at the ports, but the supercharger blows down right where they spray, so you can just imagine how well that mixes....
Old 11-15-05, 01:59 PM
  #63  
Tear you apart

iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,882
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
That makes me depressed. Since me and so many others waited forever for the kit to get this. And now its good to have a knowledgable person and their first-hand thoughts on this setup.

I want Paxton back.
Old 11-16-05, 11:18 PM
  #64  
Rockn' The Galant

Thread Starter
 
Tech_Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alright, so far everythings going good after our mishaps, Snub's got the feed line on the way to my house to stop the occasional drip of oil onto the exhaust manifold!

Took it up to red line today -

But as for installation problems, here's the ones I recommend.

1) Get all the parts you don't have a week BEFORE you begin...no last minute bs, DELAY if you think you have to, don't do like I did and think we can just push on like other installs.

2) The tap is impossible to find, get it online. Make sure it's NPT as well...

3) The drill, we used a right angle drill thank god we bought one for my tranny install.

4) Make sure you have a LOT of JB Weld, etc. You never know when it'll come in handy.

5) Make sure you adjust the idle and adjust the gas BEFORE trying to figure out why its not idiling right.

6) Get some spare vacuum line and a tee, something they forget to tell you they dont include.

7) Make sure and get the gasket for the intake manifold before hand, snubs dad sent me the exhaust manifold...err I guess we could manage to make that work somehow right? LoL just messing with you snub, my dad would have sent off my cellphone for all he knew.

If anyone has any questions about the install I'll be more than happy to answer, I was observing for 80% of the time while SonicRAT was pimping the install labor wise, I'm just lazy, the other time I was holding him back from beating up my car and then I did misc stuff like injector harnesses, etc.

Like I said...

If you're looking for a BOLT-ON (for the most part) KIT - Spend the money
If you're looking for a couple of extra hp/tq and have a lot of money - Spend the money
If you're looking for a 3.2 1/4 mile drag car - Keep looking
If you're looking for a lot of HP Bolt-On - Keep Looking
If you don't have access to basic tools, and some special ones - Keep Looking

I HIGHLY recommend an SAFCII at LEAST for the install as it helped me get the car in a running and working condition until I get the vacuum leaks fixed.

AN Fittings are fun, but don't put them on backwards (cough cough snub cough cough lol).
Old 11-17-05, 08:20 AM
  #65  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
lol, no ****, that damn backwards AN fitting probably cost you $3 in gas lol, I knew I should've checked if the swivel was still swiveling after it was tightened before testing the pressure.
Old 11-19-05, 02:41 PM
  #66  
Rockn' The Galant

Thread Starter
 
Tech_Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
lol, no ****, that damn backwards AN fitting probably cost you $3 in gas lol, I knew I should've checked if the swivel was still swiveling after it was tightened before testing the pressure.
SHOULDA keyword...lol damn you snub!

That's ok, I probbaly spent more than that on fittings that werent of the right size...
Old 12-28-05, 07:50 AM
  #67  
SUPERnaturally Aspirated

 
shiftnmadkwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 337
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by beefhole
Is that the camden kit? My friend bought that. What a piece of crap! Shortly after it was installed he blew the motor. It never idled right either.
i am the friend, i was happy with the kit, i dont think its a piece of crap. did i blow my motor? yes. but i had a feeling something was wrong before i even installed the kit, since when the seal let go i wasnt even under boost, i was just cruising down the highway, i am actually about to take the motor apart to do a post mortem on it.

the idle like everyone mentions is the only down fall of the kit.. i was able to get mine down to about 1200rpms with minor adjustents, the reason why i think it wont idle lower is the increased base fuel pressure. camden ups the pressure to get you more fuel with na injectors, the solution? get tII secs and a safc, turn down the fuel pressure to where its supposed to be. with that in mind youd be able to get a reasonable idle. imho 1200 wasnt bad. but less is always better

Like i said i was happy with the kit, everything was included and the car was very quick. everyone that says blah blah only xxx hp needs to get over it.

gl with the project.
Old 12-28-05, 10:29 PM
  #68  
Rockn' The Galant

Thread Starter
 
Tech_Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks shift, I'm still on the stock crappy injectors, it idles at 1800 RPM ok...but I've got to get my injectors cleaned.

I can get it to idle at 1200 RPM, if I add +50% gas all the way accross the range, which I don't even have the FPR hooked up at the moment to a vacuum source, it's wide open to allow gas to flow even, I need to hook it up but I'm waiting on the damn exhaust manifold I want to buy ($$$ wise) so I can't even read how much boost I'm pushing, I guarntee its only 5lbs because they upped the pulley size to a huge pulley to make sure I wasn't over spinning it.

My next mods are injectors, fuel pump, then exhaust!
Old 12-29-05, 12:02 AM
  #69  
W. TX chirpin Monkey

 
fastrotaries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Mesquite, TX
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I drove a 1st gen with a 13B camden set up and the TQ was awesome. It's not ***** to the wall. But it's great for the street. I was thinking about it, back when I briefly almost had a REPU.
Old 12-29-05, 12:05 AM
  #70  
Rockn' The Galant

Thread Starter
 
Tech_Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly, it's good enough were it's streetable, and to have a bit of fun on the way to work! I haven't lost any gas mileage, and I stay in boost constantly (vs a turbo where you have to stay in vacuum from what I've seen and heard).

I'm going around doing mantience items, such as fuel filter, etc - right now!
Old 12-29-05, 12:07 AM
  #71  
i am legendary

 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Boost is boost. If you are in boost you should be injecting more fuel otherwise you are or will be pinging soon. Same fuel meant for n/a with boost = ping = blown engine. So if you're in boost constantly and gas mileage is the same, that might be a bad thing.

And I still don't understand this 1800 rpm idle thing? Plus, you can ONLY get it to idle at 1200 by adding 50% fuel? Don't you see an issue with that?

Last edited by ddub; 12-29-05 at 12:10 AM.
Old 12-29-05, 12:08 AM
  #72  
Rockn' The Galant

Thread Starter
 
Tech_Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not enough to notice a huge difference in gas mileage daily driven wise, I went from 19 MPG to about 18.7 City Driving, and now there's no pinging what so ever!
Old 12-29-05, 12:11 AM
  #73  
i am legendary

 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No pinging that you know of

Some pings are very quiet and small, and you may not hear or notice them heh.
Old 12-29-05, 12:13 AM
  #74  
Rockn' The Galant

Thread Starter
 
Tech_Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, true, the reason I'm having to is the injectors are so small that Camden has to up the fuel pressure to make up for lost grounds, I'm planning on getting bigger injectors and then take all the fuel away at idle and adjust the fuel pressure and I should be good!
Old 12-29-05, 12:17 AM
  #75  
i am legendary

 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yah, something like 550 primaries and 550 or 680 secondaries, and a walbro or FD fuel pump should be good for your boost levels. Obviously some tuning will be needed with a wideband because you'll be dumping in way too much at some rpms.


Quick Reply: W00t?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.