Turbo II Dyno graph, please analyze.. also some issues if you can help..
#1
Turbo II Dyno graph, please analyze.. also some issues if you can help..
Some background on the vehicle.
1987 RX7 TurboII
Series 4 Japanese motor
We did not do the swap, it was done by a previous owner. We bought the car in running condition, but it wouldn't boost, wouldn't rev past 4k, wouldn't idle, etc. Now, it sorta idles (on 1 rotor usually until 2k rpm), boosts to 6-6.5 PSI and runs to 5.5-6.5k before doing a huge and violent backfire then will run to 7k.
The wiring harness was half gone when we got it so it's been rewired from some other T2 harnesses and everything is now connected although we need to test some sensors, replace lower intake manifold gasket (doesn't seem to be leaking but..). Timing was set to 5 degrees (L1) when the guy rewired the harness.
It takes a bit to start, sounds like a bad battery but it's not.. when we last checked compression it was ~9.4kg/cm2 for all three sides of the front rotor and ~9.2kg/cm2 for all three sides on the rear rotor.
There's some obvious (IMO) fuel and ignition issues (oh, swapped coils/wires with spares I had laying around and put in new plugs) but any ideas/help would be greatly appreciated.
FWIW: I don't know if it's using the US ECU, which crank angle sensor, etc. I know the intake manifolds are mixed (lower is the japanese one and upper is the USDM one).
I'd REALLY love to compare it to a local T2 but haven't found any yet.. IMO that comparison would be so nice to find misrouted vacuum lines, etc.. but I guess I'll just follow the vac diagrams instead..
Here's the graph, thanks for any help/suggestions/ideas.
1987 RX7 TurboII
Series 4 Japanese motor
We did not do the swap, it was done by a previous owner. We bought the car in running condition, but it wouldn't boost, wouldn't rev past 4k, wouldn't idle, etc. Now, it sorta idles (on 1 rotor usually until 2k rpm), boosts to 6-6.5 PSI and runs to 5.5-6.5k before doing a huge and violent backfire then will run to 7k.
The wiring harness was half gone when we got it so it's been rewired from some other T2 harnesses and everything is now connected although we need to test some sensors, replace lower intake manifold gasket (doesn't seem to be leaking but..). Timing was set to 5 degrees (L1) when the guy rewired the harness.
It takes a bit to start, sounds like a bad battery but it's not.. when we last checked compression it was ~9.4kg/cm2 for all three sides of the front rotor and ~9.2kg/cm2 for all three sides on the rear rotor.
There's some obvious (IMO) fuel and ignition issues (oh, swapped coils/wires with spares I had laying around and put in new plugs) but any ideas/help would be greatly appreciated.
FWIW: I don't know if it's using the US ECU, which crank angle sensor, etc. I know the intake manifolds are mixed (lower is the japanese one and upper is the USDM one).
I'd REALLY love to compare it to a local T2 but haven't found any yet.. IMO that comparison would be so nice to find misrouted vacuum lines, etc.. but I guess I'll just follow the vac diagrams instead..
Here's the graph, thanks for any help/suggestions/ideas.
#5
Stock fuel pressure, stock ECU, stock injectors, etc. not much to tune with. the A/F is far far too lean I agree, which is one thing I'm trying to figure out. Completely stock at LESS then stock boost levels, why is it so lean?
#6
What sort of O2 sensor or A/F reading was used? The best is a whide band screwed right into the manifold.
Wat boost pressure are you running?? Something is wierd.. You say you have less than stock boost pressure but 200 or so at the rear wheels. Was the dyno rigged?? What sort of bolt ons do you have?
Get a walbro in tank pump from www.autoperformanceengineering.com
Wat boost pressure are you running?? Something is wierd.. You say you have less than stock boost pressure but 200 or so at the rear wheels. Was the dyno rigged?? What sort of bolt ons do you have?
Get a walbro in tank pump from www.autoperformanceengineering.com
#7
The large dip at 4300 rpms is where your secondary injectors start firing. This is also known as the "3800" rpm hesitation. The dyno seems inaccurate. Reground the ECU and some sensors. Alsmost seems like your secondary injectors arnt firing properly. Try regounds everywhere.
Trending Topics
#9
What sort of O2 sensor or A/F reading was used? The best is a whide band screwed right into the manifold.
Wat boost pressure are you running?? Something is wierd.. You say you have less than stock boost pressure but 200 or so at the rear wheels. Was the dyno rigged?? What sort of bolt ons do you have?
Cameljoe: Again, sorry about the "under stock boost" I thought the stock boost level was 7.5 not 5.5psi, my bad.
#10
You wrote that the wiring harness has been rewired because it was missing connections. I would check those connections and then sensors that they connect to. I have to check the FSM to see if it gives you the different voltage readings that ECU/sensors are seeing.
#11
my stock t2 (88 model) with a mild exhaust boosts 6.5psi and makes approx 145 hp at the wheels... I find it very hard to believe you're making an extra 50hp with the same boost. Is the dyno readout attempting to correct the rwhp to flywheel? that would make sense I guess...
as for the air fuel ratio, mine makes a steady progression down from about 14.8 to 13, as the revs rise. This was apparently perfect (for my stock vehicle) but I'm fairly unsure on that...
Charlie
as for the air fuel ratio, mine makes a steady progression down from about 14.8 to 13, as the revs rise. This was apparently perfect (for my stock vehicle) but I'm fairly unsure on that...
Charlie
#13
Im no dyno expert by any means at all, but you see the dip at around 5500 RPMs you have a sudden dramatic drop in HP/TQ, and then at about 5800 you have a sudden leaning of the mixture, can this be realated? The only thing i can think of, and its a long shot, is that there was some lag on the wide band, say it was stuffed in the muffler or something, and was having a delay, and sensed the mixture being lean at a later RPMs. What im wondering is if you ran into any detonation during the run and droped the HP/TQ. I dont understand why their would be a drop off like that for no aparent reason. Someone help me understand maybe?
#14
Re: Turbo II Dyno graph, please analyze.. also some issues if you can help..
Originally posted by Dave-ROR
I'd REALLY love to compare it to a local T2 but haven't found any yet.. IMO that comparison would be so nice to find misrouted vacuum lines, etc.. but I guess I'll just follow the vac diagrams instead..
I'd REALLY love to compare it to a local T2 but haven't found any yet.. IMO that comparison would be so nice to find misrouted vacuum lines, etc.. but I guess I'll just follow the vac diagrams instead..
#15
Originally posted by Cameljoe
You wrote that the wiring harness has been rewired because it was missing connections. I would check those connections and then sensors that they connect to. I have to check the FSM to see if it gives you the different voltage readings that ECU/sensors are seeing.
You wrote that the wiring harness has been rewired because it was missing connections. I would check those connections and then sensors that they connect to. I have to check the FSM to see if it gives you the different voltage readings that ECU/sensors are seeing.
What would be the symptoms of a bad pressure sensor?
#16
Originally posted by Blowtus
my stock t2 (88 model) with a mild exhaust boosts 6.5psi and makes approx 145 hp at the wheels... I find it very hard to believe you're making an extra 50hp with the same boost. Is the dyno readout attempting to correct the rwhp to flywheel? that would make sense I guess...
my stock t2 (88 model) with a mild exhaust boosts 6.5psi and makes approx 145 hp at the wheels... I find it very hard to believe you're making an extra 50hp with the same boost. Is the dyno readout attempting to correct the rwhp to flywheel? that would make sense I guess...
Oh, my compression #'s above were wrong, that was for one of our 12a spare race motors, the T2 has 8.6kg/cm2 front and 8.4kg/cm2 rear compression.. about equal on all three sides (8.6, 8.5, 8.5; etc) measured by a comp-07 digital rotary compression tester.
NRA T2: 5 degrees "BTDC" if you can say that in the case of a rotary..
Roy: You're guess is as good as mine. This is our first T2. No detonation was HEARD but open downpipe is loud as hell. Evil Avaitor, JerryLH3 and one other rx7club.com guy where there for the pull and didn't mention any detonation so I'm assuming they didn't hear any either.
Ryde: I'd love to compare our cars when your's is done. It'd make some stuff a lot easier I think.
edit: Thanks for the info/comments/etc so far everyone. We are going to check ECU codes (well the first one :P ) tomm and see if it's throwing a code. And hopefully will be able to invest the time this weekend to check all the sensors. Also want to spray carb cleaner everywhere and see if I can find a leak.. didn't before but it's worth a try again.
#19
Originally posted by NRA T2
btdc? you probably want atdc (5)
btdc? you probably want atdc (5)
#20
I'm pretty sure the dyno was reading accurate numbers. None of the ITRs thought anything was wrong and they all pulled about the same numbers with the same mods. My S5 N/A pulled a 139.7 RWHP on it's best run, and an S4 N/A pulled 130 RWHP on it's best run. That S4 last time dynoed at 120, and now has a stand alone. These numbers (at least power) make a good amount of sense to me (well, I hope, otherwise I got all excited about 139.7 hp for nothing ).
Hope that might clear that up.
Hope that might clear that up.
#21
Originally posted by JerryLH3
I'm pretty sure the dyno was reading accurate numbers. None of the ITRs thought anything was wrong and they all pulled about the same numbers with the same mods. My S5 N/A pulled a 139.7 RWHP on it's best run, and an S4 N/A pulled 130 RWHP on it's best run. That S4 last time dynoed at 120, and now has a stand alone. These numbers (at least power) make a good amount of sense to me (well, I hope, otherwise I got all excited about 139.7 hp for nothing ).
Hope that might clear that up.
I'm pretty sure the dyno was reading accurate numbers. None of the ITRs thought anything was wrong and they all pulled about the same numbers with the same mods. My S5 N/A pulled a 139.7 RWHP on it's best run, and an S4 N/A pulled 130 RWHP on it's best run. That S4 last time dynoed at 120, and now has a stand alone. These numbers (at least power) make a good amount of sense to me (well, I hope, otherwise I got all excited about 139.7 hp for nothing ).
Hope that might clear that up.
#23
Originally posted by Ryde _Or_Die
So Dave how much will they charge me when I need to tune my car?
So Dave how much will they charge me when I need to tune my car?
the shop's number is 727-571-1450, ask for John.
#24
Originally posted by Dave-ROR
I think normal rates are $120/hour with wideband a/f
the shop's number is 727-571-1450, ask for John.
I think normal rates are $120/hour with wideband a/f
the shop's number is 727-571-1450, ask for John.