2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

TPS testing gone bad

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-08, 07:27 AM
  #26  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Craiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=JustJeff;7832989]
Originally Posted by Killert2

I'm not following you? It was temporarily removed so that I could get at the TPS. It sits under the TMIC. The diagnostics I've been doing have been with the engine not running.
I think he is wondering if you were trying to run the car without the IC on. if you want to start it up and still have access to the TPS then you would have to put some kind of pipe between the IC in and the IC out, and plug the 2 small vaccume lines that come off the IC. This way the MAF can still get a reading and you can have access to the TPS with the engine running.

I don't think you need to do this right now, if at all. Once you get the resistances right you should be able to adjust the idle with the IC on.

You are heating up the engine to normal operating temp before you are taking the resistance readings right??
Old 02-06-08, 12:57 PM
  #27  
Apex Seal Treachery!!!!!!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
JustJeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,406
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Craiger
I would be more concerned with the bad crimps right now rather than where the wires are being run. The stock mazda harness runs from the passanger side of the engine bay, over the right side of the engine, around the front and in underneith the UIM. With good crimps and proper insulation I imagine any noise from the alternator would be minimal or at least already accounted for. More than likely the TPS wires would have originally come out of the harness at a different spot than where they come out of your modified harness, and that's why the one on yours looks different. Also keep in mind, you have an S5 and the one in the picture is an S4, so yours is going to look different anyway.

Replace the crappy speaker wire and use good non-insulated crimps to connect the new wire, dab a bit of solder around each end of the crimp and then heat shrink each. After that, put the wire loom back around the wires and try adjusting it again. Keep in mind the stuff your following on FC3Spro.com is for an S4 (single TPS) and you have an S5 (dual TPS) your readings are going to be different since if i'm correct one TPS is for when the throttle is mostly closed and it changes to the other when you move toward WOT (don't quote me on this since i am not familiar with the S5 TPS). Either way, your readings may not be the same. Hope this helps.
What I've got so far is one of my spare N/A TPS which I took off the frame that bolts it to the throttle body. I cut and spliced in some wiring to mimic what the previous tech did. However I did all solder with no crimp at all. I didn't have any non-insulated crimps at the time (2 AM) so I painted each splice all around real well with solder and am about to heat shrink them. I'll then solder the open wires to the harness once I look a the previous work and get a better idea what length the patch should be. Heck I'll toss some more pics up so you can see work so far.

Thank you for the heads up on the S4 and S5 TPS difference. I'll do some reading and see what the differences in reistance is. I'll drive the car to do a few errands to get it warmed up. Then retest the TPS that is on the car and go from there.
Old 02-06-08, 01:01 PM
  #28  
Apex Seal Treachery!!!!!!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
JustJeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,406
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
[QUOTE=Craiger;7833369]
Originally Posted by JustJeff

I think he is wondering if you were trying to run the car without the IC on. if you want to start it up and still have access to the TPS then you would have to put some kind of pipe between the IC in and the IC out, and plug the 2 small vaccume lines that come off the IC. This way the MAF can still get a reading and you can have access to the TPS with the engine running.

I don't think you need to do this right now, if at all. Once you get the resistances right you should be able to adjust the idle with the IC on.

You are heating up the engine to normal operating temp before you are taking the resistance readings right??
Aaahh, correct I'm not creating any piping to compensate for the IC not being there. I'm simply getting the engine warm and turning it off. Removing the IC so I can get at the TPS better. With some nimble fingers I could probably adjust the TPS with the IC on, but it would be quite a ballet dance. I'd prefer to get the resistances within factory specs then put the IC back on and start it up.
Old 02-06-08, 01:22 PM
  #29  
Apex Seal Treachery!!!!!!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
JustJeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,406
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Camera battery is dead, I'll get pics later...
Old 02-06-08, 02:37 PM
  #30  
Completely Stock
 
1990TurboII-75K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Coast FL
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FL TPS Checks and Adjustment

One thing I forgot to mention before, when adjusting the TPS is to do it with the engine hot OR I have done it on a cold engine (I was tired of getting burned) if you temporarily defeat the Fast Cam operation as described below.

As I previously mentioned I prefer to adjust the TPS using Voltages VS Resistances VS light method. The following info should allow you to pick any method you like.



Old 02-06-08, 03:49 PM
  #31  
Apex Seal Treachery!!!!!!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
JustJeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,406
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Thanks for another excellent post, very helpful. I got errands done today, but Mom and shopping interfered with doing anything with the car. I've got a couple added pics

http://s191.photobucket.com/albums/z...stjeff_photos/


off to work I go......
Old 02-09-08, 09:42 PM
  #32  
Apex Seal Treachery!!!!!!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
JustJeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,406
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Final post, got everything soldered, shrink wrapped, plugged in. The TPS is within FSM resistance and the car is running MUCH better.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
03-15-22 12:04 PM
barkz
Power FC Forum
37
11-21-20 09:34 AM
SCinfidel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-08-15 05:36 PM
gabescanlon
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-05-15 12:04 AM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
09-04-15 06:17 PM



Quick Reply: TPS testing gone bad



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 PM.