2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Thoughs on single exhaust..?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-03, 10:06 PM
  #26  
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.

iTrader: (3)
 
1987RX7guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Laredo, Tx
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Cory Simpson
A chain is only as strong as it weekest link.

Meaning if you are running the stock Y pipe, with rice cannon mufflers, it's going to be pretty much the same.





Duals are louder, there isn't the exhaust sound waves from both ports to cancel each other out.

If a collected exhaust with two mufflers is loud enough to hurt my ears while my friend is cruising next to me and I can't hear my own exhaust I don't think the True Duals are louder. I don't give a **** what you all say about canceling pulses and **** I am talking about what my ears are listening to. My duals don't even register compared to a collected one and a Single muffler will be twice as loud as a collected with dual mufflers.
Old 07-23-03, 11:08 PM
  #27  
Ahhhhhhhh hhh....

 
Jaared's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: www.wRongPeople.com
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so the stock mufflers have 2" inlets?

and if i wanted to order ebay rice mufflers i need 2" and make sure its not glass packed right?

anyone feel like point a set out for me... not cuz im lazy, more like i cant stand all the rice crap that show up when you type something like "muffler" in ebay's search thing.

jaared
Old 07-24-03, 01:40 AM
  #28  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by Rx-7Blazin
its simple mazda put dual to make it quiet, just like they put a restrictive intake on to be quiet and restrictive exhaust manifolds for quiet.
You're right and wrong. Duals are quieter, but not because they're more restrictive. There're quieter because parallel muffers only deal with half the noise energy each, as I've already said. This means they don't have to be as restictive to achieve the same noise reduction.
yes ive seen under a 3rd gen there isnt much room but if it was nessicary to put it they would have probly designed the gas tank differently.
You say that like it would be easy...

Last edited by NZConvertible; 07-24-03 at 01:43 AM.
Old 07-24-03, 01:54 AM
  #29  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Atlanta.Georgia
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
single= lighter,look better (IMO)and cheaper
Old 07-24-03, 02:25 AM
  #30  
777** The Anti-rice

Thread Starter
 
DEZERTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok... but why do u say that single 3" is better for a turbo, u said the stock Y pipe is 2", wouldnt two 2" be better than one 3"? and holy **** my car is loud it sets off alarms, and its not a true dual, i dont imagine that it woudl be louder if i only had one pipe (shrug) but i dont see how a Single 3" flows better than split 2"s... somebody explain this?
Old 07-24-03, 04:39 AM
  #31  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
I'm not sure if that was for me, but I'll answer anyway...
Originally posted by DEZERTE
ok... but why do u say that single 3" is better for a turbo, u said the stock Y pipe is 2", wouldnt two 2" be better than one 3"?
That whole "single for turbo, dual for NA" thing is BS. It's about pipe size, not just the number of pipes. A pair of 2" pipes can't flow as much as as a single 3" pipe, but a pair of 2.5" pipes can flow a lot more than a single 3" pipe.
...my car is loud it sets off alarms, and its not a true dual, i dont imagine that it woudl be louder if i only had one pipe (shrug)
For the third time, two mufflers in parallel only have to deal with half the noise energy each, so the exhaust is quieter. This shouldn't be hard to understand...
i dont see how a Single 3" flows better than split 2"s... somebody explain this?
Because it's much bigger. See above.
Old 07-24-03, 08:34 AM
  #32  
Former Rx7 *****

 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pi*r^2

for 3 inch diameter we get x-section area of aprox 7.07 inch^2

for 2 inch diameter we get... aprox 3.14

therefore two 2inch pipes have total cross sectional area os 6.283

6.283 < 7.07


however for 2.5 inch pipes you get Xsection area of 4.91 inch^2

two 2.5 inch pipes give u total x section area of 9.82 inch^2

9.82 > 7.07

understand?

also energy is conserved. (good assumption here)

energy can be in the form of sound, heat, kinetic there are others too... lets focus on above.

since energy is conserved, the part where the exhaust pulse which is basically sound, heat, kinetic is split into two.

Therefore total energy /2

each muffler now has 1/2 the amount of energy it needs to absorb.

Last edited by Cheers!; 07-24-03 at 08:37 AM.
Old 07-24-03, 11:44 AM
  #33  
777** The Anti-rice

Thread Starter
 
DEZERTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe I will go with a Tri-exhaust to make it even quieter.
Old 07-24-03, 09:37 PM
  #34  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Rx-7Blazin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didnt mean it to sound like i sayd the fake duals on the rx-7s where more restrictive thats why there quiet i meant to just show a statement that most stock cars lean twards quiet more than how restrictive something is.
Old 07-25-03, 03:24 AM
  #35  
777** The Anti-rice

Thread Starter
 
DEZERTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My new idea

ok from the information i gathered on this thread, i ahve decided to put a third muffler in the center, to increase flow, while reducing noise at the same time, here is a picture of what i wanted kinda.
Old 07-25-03, 04:18 AM
  #36  
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.

iTrader: (3)
 
1987RX7guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Laredo, Tx
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
how are you gonna get it under the gas tank?
Old 07-25-03, 04:24 AM
  #37  
777** The Anti-rice

Thread Starter
 
DEZERTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 1987RX7guy
how are you gonna get it under the gas tank?
ill either run it through the gas tank, or around, maybe under though... i still woudl ratrher just run it through.
Old 07-25-03, 04:27 AM
  #38  
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.

iTrader: (3)
 
1987RX7guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Laredo, Tx
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
lol this **** is rich.
Old 07-25-03, 04:33 AM
  #39  
Old School Rotors

 
RoninAutoBoX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I want duals for my car at this point. better performance and quiter sound? Can't be beat!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigtuna
Single Turbo RX-7's
9
10-08-15 10:01 PM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
09-19-15 07:13 PM



Quick Reply: Thoughs on single exhaust..?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 PM.