2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

For those who are wondering on the weight issue of the FC...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-02 | 12:27 PM
  #1  
KiyoKix's Avatar
Thread Starter
13B N/A POWA!
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere, WRLD
For those who are wondering on the weight issue of the FC...

Here are the EXACT weights of the '86 cars...(sorry I don't have the rest of them, but it's pretty much the same for '86-88, sorry S5 guys).

2 Seater MT=1190.5/2625
2+2 MT=1190.5/2625
2 Seater AT=1225/2695
2+2 AT=1232/2715

These were taken at the introduction of the car. They're from the RX7 book written in 1985 (just before the car became available, the testing of the production model). It's got a billion other stats in there too, but those seem to be what everyone really asks so much about.
Old 10-25-02 | 12:45 PM
  #2  
1FastT2's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Sinking Spring Pa.
87 - 88 year turbo cars weigh 2845. Im not sure if the later model turbos are the same though.
Old 10-25-02 | 12:49 PM
  #3  
Erik's Avatar
Best of both worlds
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Re: For those who are wondering on the weight issue of the FC...

Originally posted by KiyoKix
Here are the EXACT weights of the '86 cars...(sorry I don't have the rest of them, but it's pretty much the same for '86-88, sorry S5 guys).

2 Seater MT=1190.5/2625
2+2 MT=1190.5/2625
2 Seater AT=1225/2695
2+2 AT=1232/2715

so how come the "2+2 AT" has added weight for a back seat....but the "2+2 MT" doesn't have added weight for a back seat...
Old 10-25-02 | 12:51 PM
  #4  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Do a barrel roll!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 2
From: Lower Burrell, PA
Yea, those are about right, but remember that there will be slight weight differences between models. GXLs had 15" wheels, bigger brakes, LSD, steel hood (some of them), power windows.....all which add more weight. The difference isnt drastic, maybe as much as 100lbs though. Not exactly sure.
Old 10-25-02 | 12:55 PM
  #5  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,203
Likes: 2,826
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by 1FastT2
87 - 88 year turbo cars weigh 2845. Im not sure if the later model turbos are the same though.
have you wieghed yours?
my 20b fc (88 car) wieghs 2860lbs with a full tank of gas

mike
Old 10-25-02 | 03:19 PM
  #6  
KiyoKix's Avatar
Thread Starter
13B N/A POWA!
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere, WRLD
I don't remember where to get the article, but the 2 MT's weigh the same because something in the car was different to maintain the weight of the lighter car. Which is why they weigh the same no matter which way you get it. It's not in the book that I remember but I'll check tonight. It's a seperate article.
Old 10-25-02 | 03:29 PM
  #7  
Roundabout's Avatar
Village Idiot
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 1
From: Duluth, MN
do you have numbers for the base, SE, Sport, and GTU?
Old 10-25-02 | 03:43 PM
  #8  
KiyoKix's Avatar
Thread Starter
13B N/A POWA!
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere, WRLD
No it doesn't say anything about those. Sorry it's strictly '86. Every other imaginable stat though
Old 10-25-02 | 05:08 PM
  #9  
jsotelo's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove, Cali
I have an 87 base with 14 in phone rims, sunroof, 5 speed, storage bins, power mirrors, aluminum spare + jack and steel hood.

The shipping weight on the invoice is listed at 2640 lbs.

It's a feather
Old 11-02-02 | 03:03 PM
  #10  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Displacement > Boost
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Originally posted by RouNdaBouT
do you have numbers for the base, SE, Sport, and GTU?
Hi,

In the book, "Sports car color history Mazda RX-7" it has stats of all models in a table in the back. The GTU is considered a base model for weights, I guess:

86 base MT: 2625 lbs.
88 base MT (SE): 2625
87 Turbo: 2845
88 convertible: 3003
89 base MT: 2800
89 base AT: 2844
89 convertible MT: 3045
89 convertible AT: 3105
91 coupe MT: 2787
91 coupe AT: 2831
91 conv. MT: 3071
91 conv. AT: 3115

Makes me glad I chose a cheaper, older 87 base mdl. over the S5's that I was wanting . . .

Ricers
Old 11-06-02 | 08:07 AM
  #11  
KiyoKix's Avatar
Thread Starter
13B N/A POWA!
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere, WRLD
Nice find! By the way the book that I was reading stated that the GXL was the model they weighed (2625).
Old 11-06-02 | 08:45 AM
  #12  
GLHS's Avatar
Shelby Tuner & FC badass
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, Florida
Not saying any of this info is incorrect.

But the weight of my car, before anything was removed was exactly 2524lbs. My car is a SE 88 with LSD and with a lightweight package that included the hood and smaller wheels and brakes. No power anything.

Just something to consider.
Old 11-06-02 | 10:42 AM
  #13  
666power's Avatar
this field is to small
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro, NC
i have a completly stock 88 vert and its right at 3000 so thats right, i have a 88 SE with only a drivers seat and a guage cluster taped to teh stearing column in it, ill have to weigh it when i get a chance
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
09-03-15 08:10 PM
roondawg
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
08-24-15 05:43 PM
Marty RE
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
08-17-15 10:36 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.