2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

straight pipe = fuel efficiency

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-05, 10:57 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
d_rotary_rocket_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
straight pipe = fuel efficiency

hey just wondering if anyone can tell me how much fuel mileage i should expect to lose by getting rid of the 3 cats and putting on a straight down pipe to a muffler.
Old 03-01-05, 11:07 AM
  #2  
Emerald Triangle for life

iTrader: (5)
 
ScrapFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My GXL's freeway cruise went from 22-24mpg to 24-27mpg when I replaced my exhaust. I don't think you'll lose mileage unless the newfound power and noise have you leaving the throttle on the floor all the time.
Old 03-01-05, 11:22 AM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
bigturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: co
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You should not loose any gas mileage you shoudl actually get better gas mileage. At least thats what I have noticed on every car I have owned. especially if you drive ont he highway a lot.
Old 03-01-05, 12:01 PM
  #4  
Resident Know-it-All

iTrader: (3)
 
patman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Richland, WA
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
getting rid of stock exhaust is worth 2-4 mpg depending on driving style

pat
Old 03-01-05, 12:25 PM
  #5  
Respecognize!

 
Whizbang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Anchor Bay, CA
Posts: 4,106
Received 71 Likes on 42 Posts
thanks me having a TII i should loss some for the compensation needed for the boost increase....damn turbo
Old 03-01-05, 03:07 PM
  #6  
7th Heaven

iTrader: (9)
 
slpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by patman
getting rid of stock exhaust is worth 2-4 mpg depending on driving style

pat
hit the nail square in the head... exactly what i gained
Old 03-01-05, 04:03 PM
  #7  
PIMP

 
therotaryrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by Low Impedance
thanks me having a TII i should loss some for the compensation needed for the boost increase....damn turbo
what? this measurements of gas milage seems to be at cruise and out of the boost. hold on, what?

Last edited by therotaryrocket; 03-01-05 at 04:05 PM.
Old 03-01-05, 05:04 PM
  #8  
Is that thing Turbo?

 
totallimmortal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think he might be saying that percent wise the increase in gas mileage on a turbo car might not be as much since adding a free flowing exhuast increases boost and uses more fuel, and boost should be considered cause most people with a turbo car put it in boost at least a little each time they drive it, i mean how couldn't you?
Old 03-01-05, 05:23 PM
  #9  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (7)
 
Sideways7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Temple, Texas (Central)
Posts: 6,596
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
A straight pipe on a turbo also means you'll prob need to put in more fuel to avoid detonation, therefore reducing milage.
Old 03-01-05, 05:34 PM
  #10  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
RylAssassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I get 19mpg city with a straight pipe and mods. Its supposed to help gas milage due to the fact your getting rid of a restriction.
Old 03-01-05, 05:34 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
ra ra rotory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: "You take my car, I take your knee caps"
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mine stayed about the same when I put on my exhuast.. But only becuase I reved out the car more often.. Revvv Revvv Pow!
Old 03-01-05, 07:51 PM
  #12  
Is that thing Turbo?

 
totallimmortal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes your getting rid of a restriction which means more boost and more boost equals more fuel and more power. If you just lost the restriction and didn't use more fuel you'd be in trouble running that lean. With that said i'm still think it would offer better fuel economy with unrestriced exhuast that without but just not quite the increase one may see on a non turbo car
Old 03-01-05, 08:27 PM
  #13  
Lives on the Forum

 
WAYNE88N/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Coldspring TX
Posts: 5,721
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
My mileage has always been between 25-27 mpg with 3 different exhaust setups, the latest being an open system, so I'm in the "not much change" group...

Outside air temps affect my mileage more than anything else, believe it or not...

The car is only driven back & forth to work, 100 miles round trip, so I can get pretty exacting sampling numbers for mileage...Case in point- the last fillup, 11.584 gallons, at 300.8 miles, netted 25.9 mpg...
Old 03-01-05, 08:33 PM
  #14  
Is that thing Turbo?

 
totallimmortal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ thats good mileage i hope to get that much once my safc is tuned and i'm not running so rich
Old 03-01-05, 09:03 PM
  #15  
Resident Know-it-All

iTrader: (3)
 
patman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Richland, WA
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
i wish i got 20 mpg...or hell...even a steady 16 or 17 would be ok...****** big turbo..
Old 03-01-05, 09:07 PM
  #16  
Full Member

 
DannyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southern California, High Desert
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you never get good gas milage in boost, you get good gas milage staying out of boost, like during cruising and closed loop.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 AM.