2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Skeptic of Banjo bolt mod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-05 | 12:56 AM
  #1  
capn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mechanical Engineering
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 25
From: South Carolina
Skeptic of Banjo Bolt/PD Elimination Mod

Hey all

i have pretty much everything required to do that bonjo bolt swap. but im a bit skeptical of the procedure. like why am i removing a "shock" where there should be one? i mean when i think about it its like if my car had no suspension it would shake itself to death and eventually fall all to pieces. so can someone give me some rational or PROOF that it actually works and why the PD isnt needed if its put on ALL the fuel injected rotarys.

i just want to be sure im not going to get another fuel leak and loose my 10th AE
Old 01-30-05 | 01:14 AM
  #2  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
The banjo bolt mod requires an aftermarket FPR with a built-in pulsation dampener if you want to keep the pulsation dampening properties. Otherwise, yes, I would be worried about killing the fuel injectors and/or improper fuel metering without a pulsation dampener.
Old 01-30-05 | 01:26 AM
  #3  
capn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mechanical Engineering
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 25
From: South Carolina
ok thats one thing i never really found in the banjo bolt mods. but what is a good fpr to buy i wanna do it soon so something locally available (pepboys or autozone)
Old 01-30-05 | 02:02 AM
  #4  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 19
From: n
If you're scared, don't do it.


-Ted
Old 01-30-05 | 02:08 AM
  #5  
capn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mechanical Engineering
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 25
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by RETed
If you're scared, don't do it.


-Ted
im more scared of having my 10th ae catch on fire due to the pd
Old 01-30-05 | 03:09 AM
  #6  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,576
Likes: 26
From: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Ive done it for years with no issues. IF you're a whiner, or a purist type, make your way to the local dealership and place an order for a new $125 PD and be happy while waiting for *it* to fail in a few years' time.
Old 01-30-05 | 05:43 AM
  #7  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by capn
im more scared of having my 10th ae catch on fire due to the pd
This is not a personal attack, since you're certainly not the only one who thinks this way, but this ignorance about PD's is incredibly frustrating. PD's fail because the are very old, usually over 15 years old. If you buy a new one (instead of being a cheap bastard and fitting a banjo bolt), you can pretty much guarantee that it too will last for at least 15 years (not "a few years"). If you're really that paranoid about the stock PD, go buy an aftermarket one.
Old 01-30-05 | 06:48 AM
  #8  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 19
From: n
I've seen PD's on FD's under 5 years old fail.


-Ted
Old 01-30-05 | 11:23 AM
  #9  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,793
Likes: 119
From: London, Ontario, Canada
NZ pretty much covered what I was going to say. The PD is there for a reason, to absorb the "shockwaves" formed when the injectors snap open/closed. Nearly every EFI system on the planet is equipped with a PD, for good reason.

As for the part leaking, yes, like any part, they will eventually fail. But the vast majority of RX-7s out there are still driving on their original PD without issues. There will always be some initial failure, it can happen with any part.

Maybe I'm just weird, but I don't drive around in fear waiting for my PD to fail.
Old 01-30-05 | 11:51 AM
  #10  
capn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mechanical Engineering
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 25
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
Ive done it for years with no issues. IF you're a whiner, or a purist type, make your way to the local dealership and place an order for a new $125 PD and be happy while waiting for *it* to fail in a few years' time.
is it really $125??? if it is im just going to buy an aftermarket one. like the marren one and be done with it thats rediculous.
Old 01-30-05 | 12:52 PM
  #11  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by capn
but what is a good fpr to buy i wanna do it soon so something locally available (pepboys or autozone)
The SX FPR is good.
http://www.rx7store.net/index.asp?Pa...S&Category=262
http://www.essexind.com/sx_frame.htm
Old 01-30-05 | 01:06 PM
  #12  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary

 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by capn
is it really $125??? if it is im just going to buy an aftermarket one. like the marren one and be done with it thats rediculous.
Yes it is, I bought one.
Old 01-30-05 | 01:14 PM
  #13  
capn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mechanical Engineering
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 25
From: South Carolina
the marren PD is $114 and its rebuildable. i think i will spend more retrofitting that then buying an OEM one
Old 01-30-05 | 01:18 PM
  #14  
SnowmanSteiner's Avatar
Ga-nome liberator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
From: Hell
The PD is a neccessary part of the fuel system. If you are worried about it failing and don't want to spend the 125 on a new one from mazda, get a marren. They are $115 and they don't have the problem of the nut working itself loose. Sounds like a win win situation to me, but then again I'm one of those freak guys who chooses to buy things that work rather than eliminating an essential part of the fuel system.

http://www.injector.com/fueldampers.php

- Steiner
Old 01-30-05 | 01:21 PM
  #15  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary

 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
I actually have a question that kind of goes along with all this. RETed's parallel fuel mod on his site has interested me, and I know it doesn't use a PD. Because of the FPR and the fact it's parallel does that mean it no longer needs it at all? Or is it another one of those "not that big of a deal" things like many people call the banjo bolt mod?
Old 01-30-05 | 02:01 PM
  #16  
MakoRacing[FC]'s Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by SnowmanSteiner
The PD is a neccessary part of the fuel system. If you are worried about it failing and don't want to spend the 125 on a new one from mazda, get a marren. They are $115 and they don't have the problem of the nut working itself loose. Sounds like a win win situation to me, but then again I'm one of those freak guys who chooses to buy things that work rather than eliminating an essential part of the fuel system.

http://www.injector.com/fueldampers.php

- Steiner
That Marren FPD isn't supposed to fit on the side of the fuel rail is it? I think it would be cool to stick that thing in an easy to reach spot, away from hot stuff.
Old 01-30-05 | 02:14 PM
  #17  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious

 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
archive has a marren FPD retrofit for N/As
Old 01-30-05 | 02:51 PM
  #18  
capn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mechanical Engineering
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 25
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by gingenhagen
archive has a marren FPD retrofit for N/As
yeah i checked that out

but i have a turbo so i could do a write up with pics for turbo models
Old 01-30-05 | 03:41 PM
  #19  
MakoRacing[FC]'s Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by gingenhagen
archive has a marren FPD retrofit for N/As
Thanks, im reading it now.
Old 01-30-05 | 03:57 PM
  #20  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
Originally Posted by capn
Hey all

i have pretty much everything required to do that bonjo bolt swap. but im a bit skeptical of the procedure. like why am i removing a "shock" where there should be one? i mean when i think about it its like if my car had no suspension it would shake itself to death and eventually fall all to pieces. so can someone give me some rational or PROOF that it actually works and why the PD isnt needed if its put on ALL the fuel injected rotarys.

i just want to be sure im not going to get another fuel leak and loose my 10th AE
i had no problems, issues, or failures brought on by the banjo bolt replacing the PD, even without an aftermarket FPR. I ran the car for around 25k miles like that. Nothing failed or blew up. Injectors were fine and are on someone's car now working like a charm.
Old 01-30-05 | 04:10 PM
  #21  
gingenhagen's Avatar
I am 2Furious

 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: NJ / Philly
Originally Posted by capn
yeah i checked that out

but i have a turbo so i could do a write up with pics for turbo models
Yeah, just needs more -6AN line and somewhere to stick that massive FPD.
Old 01-30-05 | 04:44 PM
  #22  
capn's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mechanical Engineering
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 25
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by gingenhagen
Yeah, just needs more -6AN line and somewhere to stick that massive FPD.
yeah on the front near the omp is where i think im going to put it
Old 01-30-05 | 05:04 PM
  #23  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by dDuB
RETed's parallel fuel mod on his site has interested me, and I know it doesn't use a PD. Because of the FPR and the fact it's parallel does that mean it no longer needs it at all?
Some aftermarket FPR's have a buit-in PD. That fact that the rails are in parallel doesn't mean a PD is no longer required.
Old 01-30-05 | 05:14 PM
  #24  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary

 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
Some aftermarket FPR's have a buit-in PD. That fact that the rails are in parallel doesn't mean a PD is no longer required.
That was my question basically. I realized there was no PD in the diagram specifically listed and just wanted to know why and what you were supposed to do. So you're pretty much saying that an aftermarket FPR with a built-in PD is the best option, correct?
Old 01-30-05 | 05:22 PM
  #25  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Yup.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 PM.