Single it out or dules??
#76
mad scientist
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/10_year_icon.png)
Quietest depends more on mufflers than anything else. And I dont know if there would even be a measureable difference between a collected dual and a collected single using the same mufflers. At most, maybe a hp or two.
#79
Originally posted by BlackFC_NYC
i have the corksport single exhaust, its a good piece, stainless all the way through, and the piping is huge. its deffinally lighter then a dual setup, but its really loud, on my car. (sometimes good, sometimes bad) =)
i have the corksport single exhaust, its a good piece, stainless all the way through, and the piping is huge. its deffinally lighter then a dual setup, but its really loud, on my car. (sometimes good, sometimes bad) =)
#81
Full Member
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/05_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pomona, CA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After reading this thread i think ive changed my mind on this topic.
I used to think and belive that only collected duals belonged on a 2nd gen. I think most of this came from the fact that it made the car look complete. But now im starting to realize that if the exhaust is collected then it may make more sense to come out single.
However when it comes to drag racing cars where weight is crucial they still run duals with a crossover H or X pipe. Part of me wants to run a single for the weight savings and the "Form follows function" credo but I think im still gonna run collected duals. ITs a much cleaner look and the weight savings isnt really all that much. After all I do have an aluminum hood and no more AC.
I used to think and belive that only collected duals belonged on a 2nd gen. I think most of this came from the fact that it made the car look complete. But now im starting to realize that if the exhaust is collected then it may make more sense to come out single.
However when it comes to drag racing cars where weight is crucial they still run duals with a crossover H or X pipe. Part of me wants to run a single for the weight savings and the "Form follows function" credo but I think im still gonna run collected duals. ITs a much cleaner look and the weight savings isnt really all that much. After all I do have an aluminum hood and no more AC.
#83
No longer cares
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/05_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: just a bit north of your business
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not really all that different at all. H pipes are used to provide scavenging to the opposite cylinder bank the same as the collector is used to do the same thing with a rotary header. Type of racing has nothing to do with it.
I bet if you properly located an H pipe on those true duals you'd see another couple HP and probably a wider powerband.
I bet if you properly located an H pipe on those true duals you'd see another couple HP and probably a wider powerband.
#84
I am the Anti-Ch(rice)t
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/05_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you guys who fight about the single looking "unbalanced" or looking wrong on a car with cutouts for duals. i have a single exit that looks completely balanced from the rear. in fact, you cant even tell which side the exhaust comes out from the back and i think my exhaust is lighter and flows more than any exhaust with a muffler.
i personally absolutely hate the sound of duals, true or fake, i think they both sound like crap. collected just has a much smoother note to it no matter how you look at it, plus it requires less "muffling" in order to get a tolerable note.
Ive never seen that done. On a V-8, yes the X or H pipe is very important, as the flow of the exhaust is way different that that of a rotary.
actually they are exactly the same, minus a little volume diff. the X and H pipe work on the principle that there are alternating pulses of exhaust. the collector is placed at a measured point from its origin.
in boinger terms, when one valve opens at X rpm the pulse from another cylinder will pass the collector, creating a low pressure in the opposite tube, thus "pulling" the exhaust out of the opening chamber. this gets more of the burned fuel out of the chamber to allow for better combustion next fire. this is scavenging if i am not mistaken
depending on the distance from the "valve", the rpm at which the optimum scavenging is achieved will fluctuate. thus a tuned x-pipe for a V8will have most of its effect at a low rpm since that is where the power is for those motors.
tuned collector for a rotary will have optimum efect at a higher rpm. generally you want to tune it slightly lower than your peak power or torque.
all of this works the same for a rotary with different terminology. (i.e. valves = apex seal passing exhaust port)
y pipes and x pipes work on the same principle. x pipes work a bit better at this but this can cause problems. if the scavenging is too strong and badly tuned on a rotary, the result can be that during overlap fuel and fresh air can be pulled all the way through , straight into the exhaust. not such a big deal if you are just pulling air, but the injectors only fire once per face. gotta burn all the fuel in the chamber, no the exhaust tip.
so the renesis, with no overlap, would benefit greatly from a well tuned x pipe.
oh, this is also part of the reason that pacesetter headers suck donkey *****, the tubes are different lengths, i know of people who have dynoed lower numbers on the pacecrappers than a stock exhaust, probably due to the fact that they were collecting them and two pulses were reaching the collector at the same time. plus they have crappy welds.
i think i babbled on long enough, adam tell me if i missed anything
Justin
i personally absolutely hate the sound of duals, true or fake, i think they both sound like crap. collected just has a much smoother note to it no matter how you look at it, plus it requires less "muffling" in order to get a tolerable note.
Ive never seen that done. On a V-8, yes the X or H pipe is very important, as the flow of the exhaust is way different that that of a rotary.
actually they are exactly the same, minus a little volume diff. the X and H pipe work on the principle that there are alternating pulses of exhaust. the collector is placed at a measured point from its origin.
in boinger terms, when one valve opens at X rpm the pulse from another cylinder will pass the collector, creating a low pressure in the opposite tube, thus "pulling" the exhaust out of the opening chamber. this gets more of the burned fuel out of the chamber to allow for better combustion next fire. this is scavenging if i am not mistaken
depending on the distance from the "valve", the rpm at which the optimum scavenging is achieved will fluctuate. thus a tuned x-pipe for a V8will have most of its effect at a low rpm since that is where the power is for those motors.
tuned collector for a rotary will have optimum efect at a higher rpm. generally you want to tune it slightly lower than your peak power or torque.
all of this works the same for a rotary with different terminology. (i.e. valves = apex seal passing exhaust port)
y pipes and x pipes work on the same principle. x pipes work a bit better at this but this can cause problems. if the scavenging is too strong and badly tuned on a rotary, the result can be that during overlap fuel and fresh air can be pulled all the way through , straight into the exhaust. not such a big deal if you are just pulling air, but the injectors only fire once per face. gotta burn all the fuel in the chamber, no the exhaust tip.
so the renesis, with no overlap, would benefit greatly from a well tuned x pipe.
oh, this is also part of the reason that pacesetter headers suck donkey *****, the tubes are different lengths, i know of people who have dynoed lower numbers on the pacecrappers than a stock exhaust, probably due to the fact that they were collecting them and two pulses were reaching the collector at the same time. plus they have crappy welds.
i think i babbled on long enough, adam tell me if i missed anything
Justin
#85
mad scientist
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/10_year_icon.png)
Youre a little off on the problems with x pipes on a rotary. Rob Golden had some experience with x pipes, and his problem was the powerband was too narrow. The pulses interfere at rpm's other than what its tuned for. This is problematic on the x pipe, b/c it makes very effective use of the pulses. It lost a lot of power out of th epowerband, and gained a lot within the powerband. But the powerband was too narrow to be worthwhile.
Y pipes dont scavenge as effectively, and therefore lose less power out of their powerband. Also, the nature of the transition from 2 pipes to one helps the flow of exhaust gasses. Again, less losses out of the powerband.
In defense of x pipes, I think Robs tests were far from definitive, and I would imagine he didnt spend a great deal of time testing and tuning it.
X pipes work great on V8's for 2 reasons. One, ots crossing over exhaust from 4 different cylinders on each side. There are considerably more pulses, and theyre not very strong, and run together soemwhat. Second, they have inherently narrow powerbands. The simple fact that rotaries can easily run 8K rpm with bolt ons requires a completely different tunign strategy than an engine that will never see past 6K rpm, an usually makes peak power closer to 5k.
Y pipes dont scavenge as effectively, and therefore lose less power out of their powerband. Also, the nature of the transition from 2 pipes to one helps the flow of exhaust gasses. Again, less losses out of the powerband.
In defense of x pipes, I think Robs tests were far from definitive, and I would imagine he didnt spend a great deal of time testing and tuning it.
X pipes work great on V8's for 2 reasons. One, ots crossing over exhaust from 4 different cylinders on each side. There are considerably more pulses, and theyre not very strong, and run together soemwhat. Second, they have inherently narrow powerbands. The simple fact that rotaries can easily run 8K rpm with bolt ons requires a completely different tunign strategy than an engine that will never see past 6K rpm, an usually makes peak power closer to 5k.
#89
I am the Anti-Ch(rice)t
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/05_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 1987RX7guy
I think that the DUALS would be better for the N/a since you want to keep the two outlet design
I think that the DUALS would be better for the N/a since you want to keep the two outlet design
![Smilie](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
in response to the tuning of y and x pipes. the increases in the powerband are actually audible since when the pulses are perfectly timed you will get a steady beat. you could actually measure the note it creates by calculating the frequency of the pulses, but when the exhaust starts to "sing" that will be where you are getting the most gain. funny thing i noticed on my exhaust is i have 2 areas where it harmonizes. just based off of acoustic principles, approximately 1 octave apart
thinking about this, i assume when Rob did his test he shot for gains in the middle of the powerband, but theoretically there should be multiple points in the powerband where the scavenging effect is optimal, unusable for low rpm v8s, but a rotary with its two distinct, high volume pulses could possibly use the multiple "harmonizations" to a great effect. i have to do some math to figure it out, but, with a high rpm built motor (10,000rpm) it could be possible to cause the powerband to become very flat, this of course would lower the peak power, but the longer band would be much more useful, especially in AutoX
Netseven,
if you want to go with a dual exit, go from headers-ypipe(2-1), go however far back you want then split into whatever heavy assed mufflers you want to use. this is far from my recommendation but it would be the best for power if you have to look "balanced". waste of space and money if you ask me, for less overall gain. take a look at supertrapp mufflers though.
Adam what do you think of my theory?
Justin
#90
mad scientist
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/10_year_icon.png)
Sounds pretty good. I guess now might be a good time to tell you that your exhaust (and all other short primary exhausts) are tuned at the 2nd octave. An exhaust tuned on the first octave would require each of the pipes to be betwen 6 and 7 feet before the collector. That would put the collector right about where the differential is. Its possible with a single muffler, but duals is impractical. Thats one of the reasons you rarely see long primary exhaust on an FC. I did see pics of soemone who did that a little while ago, btu I dont remember who it was.
The short primary also can have 2 rpm points where its tuned at. The wide powerband of a rotary makes that possible. Thats what Justin noticed. And he is right abotu the exhaust "singing". It will sound different at the rpm its tuned for.
The short primary also can have 2 rpm points where its tuned at. The wide powerband of a rotary makes that possible. Thats what Justin noticed. And he is right abotu the exhaust "singing". It will sound different at the rpm its tuned for.
#92
NA Powah, Every Hour!
![](/images/misc/20_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA, U S of A
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yo,
Mazdaspeed, did you have the Mazdatrix True Dual system with the dual Racing Beat presilencers, or did you go custom?
Kevin
1989 GTUs "Now he tells me...."
Mazdaspeed, did you have the Mazdatrix True Dual system with the dual Racing Beat presilencers, or did you go custom?
Kevin
1989 GTUs "Now he tells me...."
#96
Rotary Enthusiast
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/10_year_icon.png)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mephis your so true no matter what you do if you own an import in other peoples eyes if you do any modifications expecially exhaust your considered a ricer. still what i think the definition of a ricer is any overy exjurated car that was once a family/economy car urned into a race car, rx-7's supras, 300zx's, 240-280z's all those are forgine sports cars built for speed and built so people could modify them so i do not consider any forign sports car rice unless of corse there car has been way over exhajurated with wings stickers ducts bodykits ect
just my 2 cents
just my 2 cents
#98
NA Powah, Every Hour!
![](/images/misc/20_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA, U S of A
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yo,
Jason, please post! I just bought a used Mazdatrix True Dual set up, and this damn post is giving me buyer's remorse!
Tell me I did the right thing!
*grin*
Kevin
1989 GTUs "Damn Mazdaspeed7!"
Jason, please post! I just bought a used Mazdatrix True Dual set up, and this damn post is giving me buyer's remorse!
Tell me I did the right thing!
*grin*
Kevin
1989 GTUs "Damn Mazdaspeed7!"
#100
Rotary Enthusiast
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/05_year_icon.png)
yeah but real race cars also strip every possible pound off the car. This is a street car, where form is important too, not just function.
Yes, I think any car that was designed as a sports car cannot be "rice". The only time I ever mutter "damn ricer" to myself is when seeing a protege with euro-lights, a civic with a fart cannon, etc.
Think about it. The F&F supra was a rice car in every respect, but almost everyone still thinks it's sweet.
Anyway, I say go collected header+presilencer+dual cat-back of your choice. You get the weight savings and peak power of collected, plus the much better look of duals.
I could understand putting on a single if there wasn't a section cut out on both sides of the bumper. If you fill in that little 1/3 circle, then it would look alright.
Yes, I think any car that was designed as a sports car cannot be "rice". The only time I ever mutter "damn ricer" to myself is when seeing a protege with euro-lights, a civic with a fart cannon, etc.
Think about it. The F&F supra was a rice car in every respect, but almost everyone still thinks it's sweet.
Anyway, I say go collected header+presilencer+dual cat-back of your choice. You get the weight savings and peak power of collected, plus the much better look of duals.
I could understand putting on a single if there wasn't a section cut out on both sides of the bumper. If you fill in that little 1/3 circle, then it would look alright.