SAFC2 TPS problem.
#1
SAFC2 TPS problem.
I just installed my SAFC2 last night. Every sensor seems to be reading properly except my TPS. I have the SAFC set to 4 cylinder arrow pointing up. When I have the gas pedal down about 40%, it will read 100% throttle. If I am in the sensor check mode, at 40% throttle, my voltage will max out. Any help will be appreciated, thanks!
#2
That's correct behavior on a S4 (which is what your sig would imply you have).
The TPS is a short range TPS. It pegs out around 1/4 throttle, and is just used for idle and low throttle operation.
The best solution is to tie it into your boost sensor instead of the TPS. Then the SAFC is reading actual engine load, and can be tuned to respond to boost/manifold pressure, which is what you'll most likely want to use it for.
-=Russ=-
The TPS is a short range TPS. It pegs out around 1/4 throttle, and is just used for idle and low throttle operation.
The best solution is to tie it into your boost sensor instead of the TPS. Then the SAFC is reading actual engine load, and can be tuned to respond to boost/manifold pressure, which is what you'll most likely want to use it for.
-=Russ=-
#5
I see what you are saying. However, if you splice it into the boost sensor, you have your key on(engine off) and you are in the sensor check mode, it will read 0% correct?
I followed this (http://www.1300cc.com/howto/how2/safc.htm) article. I woulda been nice if he had addressed that. Well, I suppose writing the article was nice in the first place.
I followed this (http://www.1300cc.com/howto/how2/safc.htm) article. I woulda been nice if he had addressed that. Well, I suppose writing the article was nice in the first place.
#6
Originally Posted by SwiftTone
I see what you are saying. However, if you splice it into the boost sensor, you have your key on(engine off) and you are in the sensor check mode, it will read 0% correct?
The boost/pressure sensor gives a 0-5v reading. The NA unit is close to 5v at atmospheric pressure, and the TII unit should be somewhere around 2.5-3v at atmospheric pressure (with 5v occurring under boost, not sure exactly what PSI).
On my NA, it reads 100% throttle with the engine off, 20% throttle or so at idle, and only goes down to 0% throttle when at high RPM closed throttle (max vacuum). I expect a TII would read somewhere around 50-70% with the engine off, 10-15% at idle, 100% under full boost, and 0% again at high RPm closed throttle.
-=Russ=-
#7
Based on the info in Paul Stokes' DIY FCD article, the TII's 0-5V MAP sensor reads from about -14psi up to +16psi. If you connect the S-AFC's TPS input to the MAP sensor those pressures would give a 0% and 100% "throttle" readings respectively. At atmospheric pressure (engine off) you should see about 45% (2.3V); idling at 16inHg vac you should see 20% (1.0V); and at 8psi boost you should see 75% (3.7V). You'll never see higher than that because you need an FCD to get over 8.6psi, and the FCD should hold the MAP sensor output at ~3.7V to avoid fuel cut.
So you need to set your low-throttle and high-throttle set-points to suit the narrower range of readings you'll get from the MAP sensor compared to the TPS. You'd need to compress 0-100% into 20-75%. If you decided to use throttle position settings of 30% and 70%, with the MAP sensor you'd need to set them to 37% and 59% instead to get the same effect.*
Personally I'd use 30% (~10inHg, cruising vac) and 50% (~1psi boost).
So you need to set your low-throttle and high-throttle set-points to suit the narrower range of readings you'll get from the MAP sensor compared to the TPS. You'd need to compress 0-100% into 20-75%. If you decided to use throttle position settings of 30% and 70%, with the MAP sensor you'd need to set them to 37% and 59% instead to get the same effect.*
Personally I'd use 30% (~10inHg, cruising vac) and 50% (~1psi boost).
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
You'll never see higher than that because you need an FCD to get over 8.6psi, and the FCD should hold the MAP sensor output at ~3.7V to avoid fuel cut.
-=Russ=-
#9
True, but most people with FCD's have an aftermarket one that plugs into the MAP sensor. If you build an FCD yourself and wire it in at the ECU (like I did) then you won't have this issue.
Last edited by NZConvertible; 10-06-05 at 01:35 AM.
#10
I've one home made FCD on one car and one RB on the other car. Both located in the engine bay where they belong and both wired to SAFC from the plug on the boost/pressure sensor. Gotta run a wire from the boost sensor to the SAFC to make it work. Big deal.
#12
Originally Posted by HAILERS
I've one home made FCD on one car and one RB on the other car. Both located in the engine bay where they belong...
IMO the FCD is much better off in the cabin by the ECU where it can't be affected by underbonnet temps. Paul Stokes even mentions this in his article. There's no reason not to wire it in at the ECU. The stock boost gauge will work normally (for what it's worth) and if you do wire an S-AFC to the MAP sensor you don't need to run extra wires...
#13
I wrote that to annoy someone from NZ (and I succeded). But ..........I've had no adverse effects from having it in the engine bay. If I do have problems with it I'll be sure to let you know. The ones from RB are meant for the engine bay and plug and play to the boost sensor and I've yet to read even one thread about how there is/was a problem with the FCD.
#14
I think the point here is that while there is no *problem* with putting it in the engine bay, there are *advantages* to putting it near the ECU in terms of getting an un-clamped signal to assorted other things that can make use of the actual signal.
-=Russ=-
-=Russ=-
#16
Originally Posted by HAILERS
The ones from RB are meant for the engine bay and plug and play to the boost sensor and I've yet to read even one thread about how there is/was a problem with the FCD.
Stoaks says, "Set the output voltage a little conservatively as variations in temperature can change the behavior of the boost sensor and your FCD. You need room for a little error." I'd rather reduce that room for error by removing the large temp variations you see in the enigne bay. Plus I'm trying to tidy up my engine bay a bit. I'd rather not add yet another little blank box.
#18
The RB ones are *potted*, so monkey see monkey do....I potted my homemade one with clear RTV as the potting compound. Packed it with clear RTV. Rattle free, moisture free outfit. The pot screw is accessable though if I want to play.
#19
Originally Posted by SwiftTone
I have a RTek7 1.5 which includes a FCD, what should i do then...?
Thanks for all the great replies
Thanks for all the great replies
This answer might be called suspect since I've little knowledge about what the RTEK does or how. I got your post back on top though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
10-07-15 09:12 PM