s4 t2 vs 7m-gte supra
#3
thanks.... I was thinking about getting a supra, but it would be more expensive, plus I like the rx body style better. Wankels are cool too. Something different for a change.
#4
It annoys me when people say the S5 is faster then the S4. The S5 is more HP, but the S4 is lighter.. Stock they are the exact same 1/4 mile numbers.
Page with stock RX numbers
Page with stock RX numbers
Trending Topics
#10
Originally posted by Rpeck
The S5 is more HP, but the S4 is lighter.. Stock they are the exact same 1/4 mile numbers.
The S5 is more HP, but the S4 is lighter.. Stock they are the exact same 1/4 mile numbers.
#11
i have an 87 t2 and my friend has an 88 mkiii turbo. i can beat him off the line because i'm a better driver, but we did some highway runs and he pulled on me every time. he had a fresh j-spec and i had a tired 170k engine, but i also had a dp/mp. and his was bone stock
#12
1JZ powered
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 0
From: Where there's only two seasons, hot and wet! I love Okinawa
Re: s4 t2 vs 7m-gte supra
Originally posted by nonameo
Which do ya think would win it, stock for stock?
Which do ya think would win it, stock for stock?
stock for stock...I think the supra should win.
#15
really, i have never raced one, but have heard from other people that have driven them, all said that they were way too heavy. did some of them come without turbos. how much do they weigh, 225 hp isn't it.
#16
Originally posted by Rpeck
It annoys me when people say the S5 is faster then the S4. The S5 is more HP, but the S4 is lighter.. Stock they are the exact same 1/4 mile numbers.
Page with stock RX numbers
It annoys me when people say the S5 is faster then the S4. The S5 is more HP, but the S4 is lighter.. Stock they are the exact same 1/4 mile numbers.
Page with stock RX numbers
You need to look over those #s.. the GSL-SE was faster then most of the second gen RX-7s
it had almost the same power and weighed a few hundred pounds less
-Zach
#17
Hey, I didnt make the chart .. I just found the chart. But all the charts i have read about stock RX #'s had the S4 & S5 being the same by the end of the quarter mile.
But hell what do I care .. my car is nowhere near stock.
But hell what do I care .. my car is nowhere near stock.
#18
really, i have never raced one, but have heard from other people that have driven them, all said that they were way too heavy. did some of them come without turbos. how much do they weigh, 225 hp isn't it.
N/A : 200 hp 188 lb-ft 3459 lbs
Turbo : 230 hp 246 lb-ft. 3530 lbs
Those numbers went up a tiny bit in the latter years of the Mark III...
#19
Originally posted by zyounker
You need to look over those #s.. the GSL-SE was faster then most of the second gen RX-7s
it had almost the same power and weighed a few hundred pounds less
-Zach
You need to look over those #s.. the GSL-SE was faster then most of the second gen RX-7s
it had almost the same power and weighed a few hundred pounds less
-Zach
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tedd930
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
36
09-16-15 11:29 PM