2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Royal Purple Very impressed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-06, 09:47 PM
  #76  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by rx7 FC TII
on the point about oil i have noticed the temp is less than what it used to be. before it was a little under half and now it is even lower(under normal driving conditions) and it feels like it runs a whole lot better.
You're talking about the stock temp gauge?


-Ted
Old 08-17-06, 09:48 PM
  #77  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by jono20
yes ted, piston powered aircraft use the same oil a rotary powered auto does. a/c oil just costs 4x more, just like everyhing else
You're talking about recreational single-props?
Or we talking about commercial turbo props?


-Ted
Old 08-17-06, 10:00 PM
  #78  
Semper

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
rx7 FC TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ya its the stock one but im hope fully gona go ahead and buy a few different temp guages like trans water....etc
Old 08-17-06, 10:51 PM
  #79  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by jono20
yes ted, piston powered aircraft use the same oil a rotary powered auto does. a/c oil just costs 4x more, just like everyhing else
There is no problem with posting your opinion on various subjects, but please don't post pseudo-fact crap like this because some people may ruin their cars if they follow the bad advice.

See, there is one now V

Originally Posted by Street_Knight
And can I use airplane oil in my rex?
NO!!!!!!!

NEVER PUT AVIATION ENGINE OIL IN YOUR CAR ENGINE!!

Contrary to some bad info posted here, they are not the same:
http://www.swaviator.com/html/issueja02/Hangar7802.html

If you ever have any doubts about a product, just ask the manufacturer or an official product representative. Unsubstantiated internet posts can cause you a lot of grief if you take them for gospel.
Old 08-18-06, 01:44 AM
  #80  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
jono20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
You're talking about recreational single-props?
Or we talking about commercial turbo props?


-Ted
yes, piston powered aircraft, a turbine engine uses turbine engine oil.
Old 08-18-06, 01:50 AM
  #81  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
jono20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
There is no problem with posting your opinion on various subjects, but please don't post pseudo-fact crap like this because some people may ruin their cars if they follow the bad advice.
I wasnt saying to put av oil in to your car. Like I said the clearances in a/c engines are much larger, and theyre all air cooled, so no, the oils are not exactly the same. I was trying to contribute some of my knowledge of oils. Though a lot of my knowledge is from an aviation standpoint, very much of it still applies to automotive stuff (such as the advantages of synthetic oil over mineral)
Old 08-18-06, 01:53 AM
  #82  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
From Evil Aviator's link...

14. Synthetic oils do not show superior performance when used in piston-powered aircraft.
The decision to use synthetic oils should be based on the expected use of the oil. Since synthetics cost at least twice as much as mineral oil-based products, there is a tendency on the part of the operator to expect them to outperform in all circumstances. In a piston engine aircraft environment, however, the favorable properties of synthetic oils are marginal. Supporters of synthetic oils have basically two main claims: one, they increase time between oil changes and second, they improve startability at extreme low temperatures. Synthetic oils will become contaminated just as quickly as mineral oil in a piston aircraft engine and synthetics do not show any appreciable difference in wear levels. OEMs do not distinguish between synthetics and mineral-based products for oil change recommendations. Also, for piston-powered aircraft, any possible low temperature benefit to a synthetic oil is irrelevant because piston aircraft started in temperatures of 20F or below must be pre-heated. With regard to extremely high-temperature operation, very few, if any, piston-powered aircraft are operated at temperatures that highlight the benefits of synthetic oils.
If you're going to imply that regular automotive engine oils can be used in piston-engine aircraft, then that above quote pretty much blows your argument out of the water on the superiority (i.e. cost effectiveness) of synths over mineral.


-Ted

Last edited by RETed; 08-18-06 at 01:55 AM.
Old 08-18-06, 02:00 AM
  #83  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
jono20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damn. I suppose im sort of wasting my life away.
I'll drop out of school first thing tomorrow.

blast that website and its infinite knowledge...

Originally Posted by RETed
From Evil Aviator's link...



If you're going to imply that regular automotive engine oils can be used in piston-engine aircraft, then that above quote pretty much blows your argument out of the water on the superiority (i.e. cost effectiveness) of synths over mineral.


-Ted
Old 08-18-06, 02:03 AM
  #84  
No money. No love.

iTrader: (12)
 
SmogSUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SACRAMENTO
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm loving thise thread. I used Royal Purple a few times...$42 bucks per oil change! Then I have to buy the filter...screw that. I premix and removed the omp, so I think fuel somehow makes its way into my oil...Karack or someone else would have ot explain that....ANYWAYS switched to GTX, good **** WAYYYY cheaper too. I change my oil every 1,500-2,000 miles and it's still cheaper than the usual 3,000 mile Royal Purple oil change.
Old 08-18-06, 02:07 AM
  #85  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
jono20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like websites too


Advantages

The industry recognizes the following benefits for synthetic motor oils:

* Improved viscosity at low temperatures. Mineral oils tend to include wax impurities which coagulate at lower temperatures. A typical 10W-30 oil remains liquid at -50 °C (-58 °F)
* Better high temperature performance. Synthetic oils have few low molecular weight hydrocarbons which evaporate at high temperatures.
* Higher purity
* Decreased oil consumption
* Reduced friction and engine wear
* Improved fuel consumption through better engine lubrication
* Resistance to oil sludge problems
* Crude oil doesn't have to be used for the production of the lubricants
* Some synthetic motor oil producers offer extended intervals between oil changes (extended drain intervals)
* Reduction of environmental impact (due to lower oil consumption)



Disadvantages

The primary disadvantage of synthetic oils is that they cost significantly more than mineral oils. Some manufacturers of synthetic oils, such as Amsoil and Mobil1, however offer extended drain intervals which allows for running the oil by over 7 times the length of conventional petroleum oils. This extended drain interval actually causes synthetics to be more cost effective over the course of 2 to 3 oil changes. However, with the recent rise in the price of petroleum the gap between the cost of a typical quart of petroleum motor oil and the typical quart of synthetic is almost negligible.

Synthetic oils can cause problems with older seals which are prone to leakage. As long as the vehicle or equipment in question is in sound mechanical condition then using synthetic oils should not be an issue.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_oil#Advantages
Old 08-18-06, 02:52 AM
  #86  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by jono20
* Improved viscosity at low temperatures. Mineral oils tend to include wax impurities which coagulate at lower temperatures. A typical 10W-30 oil remains liquid at -50 °C (-58 °F)
This would only be advantageous to a minority of people.
I live in Hawaii, where the climate is relatively mild.
This offers no advantage to me.

* Better high temperature performance. Synthetic oils have few low molecular weight hydrocarbons which evaporate at high temperatures.
Okay, so it's an advantage.
My question is...is this a SIGNIFICANT advantage?

* Higher purity
See above...

* Decreased oil consumption
Bullshit.
It is widely known that synths consists of smaller molecules.
Motors running originally on mineral oil and then switched over to synths will see increased consumption and increased tendency for oil leaks.

* Reduced friction and engine wear
Not disputing that...I'm questioning if this is SIGNIFICANT that you're able to take advantage of this?

* Improved fuel consumption through better engine lubrication
I'd generally agree, but pumping up your tire pressures a few PSI does the same thing...

* Resistance to oil sludge problems
See above about being SIGNIFICANT...

* Crude oil doesn't have to be used for the production of the lubricants
Why don't we all stop driving vehicles that burn fossil fuels then???

* Some synthetic motor oil producers offer extended intervals between oil changes (extended drain intervals)
I would never extend service intervals, so this point is moot to me.

* Reduction of environmental impact (due to lower oil consumption)
The initial assumption is wrong, so this is also false.

The problem with Wikipedia is that it's a collection of "knowledge" by individuals.
It's supposed to be self-policing, but I would never label them as being the end-all authority on ANY subject.
The point about reduced consumption is WRONG.


-Ted
Old 08-18-06, 02:59 AM
  #87  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
****** lab rats....

you know the people were paid so they have to make some results. lab tests are the most bogus BS tests when it comes to real world conditions ever.

like i said, there may be some minor benefits but feeling a difference in power, smoother idle and noticing these things is all in your heads! it's like putting a K+N filter in your car, that 2HP is hardly noticable but everyone feels the difference - of course we want to feel the difference.. we just spent $60 on a damn air filter!
Old 08-18-06, 06:45 AM
  #88  
Rotaries confuse me

iTrader: (7)
 
My5ABaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by jono20
I like websites too


Advantages

The industry recognizes the following benefits for synthetic motor oils:

* Improved viscosity at low temperatures. Mineral oils tend to include wax impurities which coagulate at lower temperatures. A typical 10W-30 oil remains liquid at -50 °C (-58 °F)
* Better high temperature performance. Synthetic oils have few low molecular weight hydrocarbons which evaporate at high temperatures.
* Higher purity
* Decreased oil consumption
* Reduced friction and engine wear
* Improved fuel consumption through better engine lubrication
* Resistance to oil sludge problems
* Crude oil doesn't have to be used for the production of the lubricants
* Some synthetic motor oil producers offer extended intervals between oil changes (extended drain intervals)
* Reduction of environmental impact (due to lower oil consumption
Ok, supposing those are correct, can I get an AMOUNT on how much these things are. Such as better high temperature performance, improved fuel consumptions... etc...

If it is true that they give better fuel consumption, maybe it's only by .0001%. BUT, that allows it to go on the bottle to sell.

Numbers > statements.
Old 08-18-06, 07:09 PM
  #89  
Passing life by

 
iceblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Scotland, USA
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by SmogSUX
I'm loving thise thread. I used Royal Purple a few times...$42 bucks per oil change! Then I have to buy the filter...screw that. I premix and removed the omp, so I think fuel somehow makes its way into my oil...Karack or someone else would have ot explain that....ANYWAYS switched to GTX, good **** WAYYYY cheaper too. I change my oil every 1,500-2,000 miles and it's still cheaper than the usual 3,000 mile Royal Purple oil change.
umm yes its called blow by buddy.
Old 08-18-06, 07:10 PM
  #90  
Passing life by

 
iceblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Scotland, USA
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by jono20
I didnt read all the posts so i dont know if anyone has mentoned this yet... butt...


the whole idea behind synthetic oil is that it doesnt break down as fast as conventional oils. it takes the best parts of mineral, vegetable, and animal oils and combines them.

normal oil needs to be changed because the molecular structure of the oil gets pounded from cycling through the motor, and the oils vicosity is lost, aswell as its ability to lubricate and seal.

normal oil needs to be changed every 3000 miles. syntheic oil only needs to be chnged every 10 or 15000 miles.

the catch is, just becuase your new oils molecular structure doesnt break down doesnt mean the engines combustion cycle isnt going to contaminate the engine with carbon. the filter must stiill be changed every 3000 miles, but you can leave the oil in.

synthetic oil also cleans the engine much, much, much more better than mineral oil

it should save you money in the long run...

15000 miles = 5 conventional oil changes. lets say 25 bucks per oil change (20 for oil, 5 for filter) thats 125 bucks.

lets say the synthetic is 3 times more at 15 bucks a litre, so that 60 bucks lasts you 15000 miles, plus the 5 filters = 25 bucks....

85 bucks versus 125.hurah for synthetic.

if it makes you feel any better, jet turbine oil is 50 dollars for one quart, and theyll hold 10 or 20 quarts, and burn a quart ever 10 hours

for some reason I still run castrol gtx....

im done blabbering now.
Well this is sertainly not the most inteligant thing I have ever read.

Oh yea you do not change oil because of brake down crap oil does not lose viscosity, sorry, but you change it do to contamination found from blow by.

woop there it is.
Old 08-18-06, 07:49 PM
  #91  
Let's eat babies

 
Street_Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And I wonder why no one mentions the oil you can get from mazdatrix...
I tried it and it seems like it's totally worth the investment.
Old 08-19-06, 03:47 AM
  #92  
Senior Member

 
Fatty_FC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by My5ABaby
2 things.

1. What you have with your mpg gains is correlation, not causation. You can't truly say the increase was due to the oil.

2. You say you use synthetics for better wear and tear resistance. Now, do you think there will be less/more/same wear and tear from going another 2000 miles between oil changes?
So you are saying that even though i have 2 separate experiences, both showing an increase in MPG with NO OTHER CHANGES, that the oil cant make any difference. Im a skeptic of thing myself, but after testing and dividing the mileage, i cant argue with the results. I average 350 miles per tank versus the old 325-330.

I probably woudnt go 5000 miles per oil change on my rx7, i would stay at 3k. My acura isnt turbo and isnt hard on oil like the rx7, 5k is fine. New cars reccomend 10k+ intervals, now that is excessive...
Old 08-19-06, 09:04 AM
  #93  
Rotaries confuse me

iTrader: (7)
 
My5ABaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Fatty_FC3S
So you are saying that even though i have 2 separate experiences, both showing an increase in MPG with NO OTHER CHANGES, that the oil cant make any difference. Im a skeptic of thing myself, but after testing and dividing the mileage, i cant argue with the results. I average 350 miles per tank versus the old 325-330.
No, what I'm saying is that you CAN'T rule out other changes. No way, no how.

Driving style, conditions, temperature, elevation... etc... etc... There's ALOT of things that could contribute to that difference of 25-20 miles more per tank.

Now, if you were to put it on a dyno (or something), run it under the same conditions with both synthetic and non-synthetic oil and show me a difference, I'll believe you.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zyph3r
Canadian Forum
10
09-16-18 07:14 PM
Rbkouki
V-8 Powered RX-7's
0
09-29-15 08:54 PM



Quick Reply: Royal Purple Very impressed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 AM.