2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Renesis powered FC saying hi from the UK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-10 | 11:04 AM
  #76  
rx7racerca's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 8
From: Lake Country, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by Nick_d_TII
Ohhhh... Nice one. You know more about rotaries, good for you, and you can count numbers. Your comment has Nothing to do with actual real world performance. YOU FAIL.

http://www.edmunds.com/mazda/rx8/history.html

RX8
"Track testing yielded a best 0-to-60-mph time of 6.6 seconds and a quarter-mile run of 15.1 seconds. Without much off-the-line torque, the RX isn't much of a stoplight king, but once underway it makes up ground quickly. Its quarter-mile speed of just over 92 mph puts the Mazda about 5 miles per hour behind the Nissan. The numbers don't lie, if you're looking to dust off local high schoolers, the RX-8 isn't the car to do it with."

86 Rx7
Car and Driver measured the first RX-7 Turbo scooting to 60 mph in just 6.5 seconds and completing the quarter-mile in 14.9 seconds with a 94-mph trap speed. This was a seriously quick car and the magazine appreciated that. "Sports car fans should be grateful to the good guys at Mazda as much for what they haven't done as for what they have," writer Tony Assenza concluded. "They could have turned the RX-7 into a precious, overweight gigolo. Instead, like good guys everywhere, they have kept the faith. The result is a fast and furious street fighter with the legs and lungs to stick it in the face of much of the expensive iron trolling the avenues."

It's close, but TII faster.

You may think you know more about rotaries, but it doesn't make you Right. Furthermore, everything works in theory, it's the real world testing that proves bitch *** theories WRONG.

The link provided above shows an average of 160-180 Rear Wheel hp of rx8s. Dyno numbers can be manipulated/corrected to make people(customers) feel happy.
If you're going to pull magazine numbers to compare the heavier, Renesis powered RX-8 to a TII, why not use the same magazine - Car and Driver tested their '04 RX-8 at 5.9s to 60, 14.6@96mph in the 1/4 - which lays a bitch slapping on a stock TII. Maybe Edmonds had a green engine, or gentler/less skilled test driver, or both. But a stock RX-8 to a stock TII, the 8 is noticeably faster - in real life, its been my observation, and on paper. Which suggests that a Rene in a FC chassis should be significantly faster than even S5 TII's, given a NA FC should come in about 250-300lbs under the 8's weight. The Rene is only a 98lb weakling compared to the current 'Stang, 350/370Z, and so on, not to 20 year old 7s. Sure, a TII can make loads more power with mods - so can a Renesis, so that's neither here nor there, although modding the Rene probably is harder/more expensive.


http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ormance_page_2

The real question here still is whether the OP has got the various port actuators and so on working, since it's likely the Rene won't breath well at high rpms without. I don't think that's been answered yet, unless I missed it going back through the thread.
Old 04-30-10 | 01:58 PM
  #77  
rotary_bünta's Avatar
Rotary Retard

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
From: 3rd rock from the sun
sweet ride mate.. didnt know you could drop a Renesis in an FC
isnt that the rx8 engine?
Old 04-30-10 | 02:53 PM
  #78  
lastphaseofthis's Avatar
My job is to blow **** up
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,900
Likes: 3
From: palmyra Indiana
Nick_d_TII, have you driven a bone stock all cats and full stock intake turbo2? i drove a modded one first.. and later on drove a bone stock one, it's pathetic, my 88 N/a was faster with just intake and exhaust!( drag times backing this claim) the stock turboII is not a fast car.

James_H, can you settle this by getting your car dyno'd? or at least take it to the drag strip?
Old 04-30-10 | 04:28 PM
  #79  
Nick_d_TII's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 6
From: Beaverton, OR
Originally Posted by rotarygod
With a Renesis that thing would run circles around a stock TII all day without even trying.
I'm not the one who wrote a renesis powered FC would 'run circles around a Stock TII all day', and clearly, I disagree.

I'm saying it's close. Rx8 maybe a little faster and a Rene in a FC might be a little faster yet, but to say it would 'Run Circles' is BS.

I REALLY just wanted to know what the OP thought of the engine and his take on how the Rene effected his FC's performance, but some others here feel the need to 'chime' in and act like they know everything and make claims w/o any credible links or information to back it up (rx7racerca, thanks for link and comment)

Have fun!
Old 05-01-10 | 04:41 PM
  #80  
13bpower's Avatar
s4 for life
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 1
From: Oahu
As much as this can all be argued about performance, I would put a Rene in an FC if I thought it was at all possible. That would be a awsome daily driver. I am very curious about if all the ports in this car are working.

Video of it driving please!!!!
Old 05-01-10 | 06:02 PM
  #81  
Otaku's Avatar
Herp Derpin
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma, WA
I wonder how it turned into a debate on what's faster... a Turbo II or RX8.

I know for sure a Renesis FC would blow the doors off of a Turbo II FC (S5 even). I'm sure the RX-8 would've been more tuner-friendly if they ditched the longer frame/weight/useless features/ rear seats.
Old 05-02-10 | 12:45 AM
  #82  
13bpower's Avatar
s4 for life
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 1
From: Oahu
Originally Posted by Otaku
I wonder how it turned into a debate on what's faster... a Turbo II or RX8.

I know for sure a Renesis FC would blow the doors off of a Turbo II FC (S5 even). I'm sure the RX-8 would've been more tuner-friendly if they ditched the longer frame/weight/useless features/ rear seats.
Seriously! Put the Rene in the Miata chassis, improve the styling, add a low boost turbo and you have the RX7 of tomorrow.
Old 05-02-10 | 08:53 AM
  #83  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,929
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
Originally Posted by 13bpower
Seriously! Put the Rene in the Miata chassis, improve the styling, add a low boost turbo and you have the RX7 of tomorrow.
its been done already.


a stock renesis engine will produce more usable power all day than a t2 will.
Old 05-02-10 | 09:02 AM
  #84  
Furb's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
From: E-L Netherlands
Originally Posted by SirCygnus
its been done already.

a stock renesis engine will produce more usable power all day than a t2 will.
then a stock T2 will you mean
Old 05-02-10 | 09:54 AM
  #85  
CS13B's Avatar
From the Roots Up!

iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 2
From: GTA, Ontario
I thought this was someone's build thread but I guess it turned into a more important debate of what everyone thinks about a couple different engines Can a mod remove all the crap so we can continue with the build that I wanted to see?
Old 05-02-10 | 12:42 PM
  #86  
James H's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: UK, Portsmouth
^^^^^
agreed
Old 05-02-10 | 01:00 PM
  #87  
KusImmak7's Avatar
Dixie Normous
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh
yeah everyone shut the **** up already and let the guy enjoy some props for doing something that nobody here has really done and well documented yet.

Kit looks fine, for what the wing is it looks alright, if one had to choose such a wing. Just really need to do something with those signals. I also understand your suspension issue as you need to daily drive it. I guarantee your car looks leaps and bounds better than most peeps cars on this board and you have a very unique swap.

Yes that car will run circles around a stock t2, if the ports actuate fine. Per the amount of effort and ease of modifying a t2, a simply modded t2 would probably spank that car, but that Rene car will weigh less and more to the core of what an rx7 should be about. Lightweight, rotary, quick.

Great swap, good build.

AND please for the love of God post some technical info such as how you are doing your ports and everything else.
The following users liked this post:
fidelity101 (07-05-18)
Old 05-02-10 | 01:17 PM
  #88  
bdarepat's Avatar
Junior Member

 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Waterlooville UK
Nice conversion James. I must admit I haven't seen your car around up to now. I am just up the A3 near Waterlooville.
Old 05-02-10 | 11:49 PM
  #89  
FC_fan's Avatar
Sideways is the only way

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
From: Vermont
well I say wait for the guy to post specs/numbers/info/etc so everyone has something to base their theories on. we don't know how the engines aux systems work yet (i.e. the ports being wired open,not working properly,how they have it wired,etc). everyone is just firing randomly into the dark thinking it works EXACTLY the same way in the FC as it does in the rx8. Easy solution is to have the OP bring it to a dyno or, more likely, a drag track and calculate his best trap times.

EDIT: missed the last page! James, contact the mod for this section and ask them to clean the thread up for you. this is getting really ridiculous.

PEOPLE, imo if you want to have an engine discussion like this then start a thread or do it through pms.
Old 05-03-10 | 01:48 AM
  #90  
Wankel7's Avatar
Haven't we ALL heard this
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,948
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Wow, this debate over what is faster an RX-8 engine or a TII engine in a FC...is about as retarded as James's wing on that car!

Jack the car up and take a picture of the sub frame.
Old 05-03-10 | 08:51 AM
  #91  
Dltreezan's Avatar
My Bick is Digger
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,509
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
^lol@sig. On demand smoke system.

Yes please more engine pics and some more of that "how did you do that?"
Old 05-03-10 | 08:58 AM
  #92  
clokker's Avatar
Cake or Death?

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,249
Likes: 63
From: Mile High
James, it is cruel and unusual to play coy with the technical details.
So far we know much more about the body- the least interesting and most subjective aspect of the project- than the real meat and potatoes.

I'm particularly intrigued by the stock radiator.
It's rare to see one even in a mostly stock houptie, much less a built/swapped project car.
No judgement implied either way, it just indicates a potentially interesting approach to the rest of the execution.
Old 05-11-10 | 06:07 PM
  #93  
CS13B's Avatar
From the Roots Up!

iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 2
From: GTA, Ontario
so... any updates or what?
Old 07-15-10 | 03:23 AM
  #94  
Fsmotorsport's Avatar
Junior Member

 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Sussex, UK
He prob doesent know any tech details! REWorx did the conversion
Old 07-15-10 | 12:25 PM
  #95  
rotary_bünta's Avatar
Rotary Retard

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
From: 3rd rock from the sun
a debate on what engine would be better isnt entirely a bad thing. it would be more effective if we had some hard facts to compare. or a test run (take his car and a modded t2, take them out for a stig spin and see what happens) or at least have some one put up some dyno charts. he can say it does 300whp all day but is it true.. lol

im just saying. im new to all this but its soooo much fun watching you vets spit out opinions
Old 07-15-10 | 07:07 PM
  #96  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by beefhole
"Torque does no work. It never has. It can't. Horesepower does."
Spoken like a true salesman... Horsepower SELLS cars. Torque wins races.
I'm going to keep an eye on this thread for more goodies like this.


I was suprised by RG'S states myself?????? The engine with the most power under the curve will always have the power advantage. Gearing is the next thing (and most forgotten). I haven't seen a stock S5 Turbo II dyno but, I wouldn't be suprised that the S5 turbo II engine made more power under the curve till the upper rpm's (when the renesis takes over). We also can't forget the rx8 has a better geared transmission to take advantage of it's power curve.
Old 08-04-10 | 07:31 AM
  #97  
Jdrift's Avatar
Sir Jason the Awesome
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
This is only coming from my prefrence and my expereince in dealing with both the NA fc motor and the Renesis motor. I deal with both at my job ( Mazda Tech at a local dealership) and to be dead honest with you. The renesis is a much more simple engine to work with then with the million issues that the old 13b's carry. Personally i'd swap powerplants on that basic fact alone.

The renesis is bound to be lighter due to the changes in intake design dropping at least 30 pounds from the engine.

The updated ignition system makes for a much easier car to diagnose. I normally see small failures lead to bigger failures such as a dead coil or fouled out sparkplugs. Also the cost of those ignition coils from the dealer are about 100 dollars. ( Get a discount of course. lol)

Vacuum lines. I won't go there. I believe the renesis has about 4 vacuum lines and three solenoids that work the intake runners.

The signifigantly improved oil lubrication systems of the later rx-8's (2009- 2010) seem to nearly zero out any flooding issues. I have not seen one 09 or 2010 in for anything more than oil changes.

The higher redline and increased power. Enough said. Yes, a TII may have more potential at the beginning, but I just don't want to deal with a turbo rotary.

Keep in mind, i'm not hating on the rx-7's by anymeans. I miss the old stylings of cars like the SA,FB, FC and FD and kind of annoyed how car companies are appealing less to overall style and more towards aerodynamics and fuel economy.

Once again this was all my opinion based on several facts that I have experince in. I haven't dealt much with Turbo 2's but I know enough to know I wouldn't want the headache. I'm sure the cost of swapping a renesis into my Fc would probably be pretty high, though I still think i'd be very happy with it once it was all said and done.
Old 08-04-10 | 12:38 PM
  #98  
rotarygod's Avatar
Rotors still spinning
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 20
From: Houston
Originally Posted by t-von
I was suprised by RG'S states myself?????? The engine with the most power under the curve will always have the power advantage. Gearing is the next thing (and most forgotten). I haven't seen a stock S5 Turbo II dyno but, I wouldn't be suprised that the S5 turbo II engine made more power under the curve till the upper rpm's (when the renesis takes over). We also can't forget the rx8 has a better geared transmission to take advantage of it's power curve.
I don't see how even a single one of you can act surprised at that statement at all unless you believe the TII to somehow be superior to what it was or the RX-8 to be less than what it is. Both are most likely true. Neither are absolute rockets.

Your quote nails the powerband question perfectly. A stock TII engine will definitely make more power than a Renesis up to a certain point. However if that point is below the usable rpm range that you'll be in for maximum acceleration, what good is it? Clearly the Renesis would be at a higher power level within the usable powerband. Yes the RX-8 does have an extra gear. However it is so close ratio that having an extra one is practically worthless. If a Renesis were in an RX-7 using the same gearing, the Renesis engine still makes more power higher up where you'll be shifting. That means it will be faster. Power under the curve is what matters but within the usable powerband. Just because engine A makes more power than engine B below 3000 rpm doesn't mean anything if the rpm range you are going to be in starts at 5000.
Old 08-04-10 | 01:19 PM
  #99  
Nick_d_TII's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 6
From: Beaverton, OR
LOLtarygod.

Just because an engine doesn't make more power, it can be faster, because the power is above 5000rpm or is it because an engine makes less power it can be faster because the power is below 3000rpm. OR is it faster because, it has an engine that has more power is faster because it's faster?

Figure that **** out...

Where 'o' Where is the OP of this thread? This BS shall be declared dead; until the OP posts specs, in regards to the performance of his rx.
Old 08-04-10 | 05:17 PM
  #100  
Jdrift's Avatar
Sir Jason the Awesome
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Personally i'd to see how they made a speedo work in that car along with Power steering if he is intending to run it.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.