RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) (https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/)
-   -   Rad exploded, now won't start. O-rings and compression fine. s5 NA (https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/rad-exploded-now-wont-start-o-rings-compression-fine-s5-na-883779/)

KhanArtisT 01-26-10 06:24 PM


Originally Posted by Amur_ (Post 9763593)
I was picturing + probe to the pin and - probe to ground, crank and watch for 12v on the display. I'm not sure what you mean by "ground repeatedly." Will a constant grounding from the probes be either disruptive or damaging?

You can use that method as well but I believe the voltage with the injectors firing should be 8v or so (?). I personally prefer grounding it because its a simpler test.

By ground repeatedly I mean ground the injector simulating a duty cycle. If you ground it for more than 3 seconds (?) it can overheat the coil inside the injector.

Amur_ 01-26-10 06:41 PM


Originally Posted by KhanArtisT (Post 9763724)
You can use that method as well but I believe the voltage with the injectors firing should be 8v or so (?). I personally prefer grounding it because its a simpler test.

3W - inj (front primary) - 11.4v key ON, ~8.8v during cranking

3Y - inj (rear primary) - 10.3v key ON, ~8.7v during cranking

My back-probing and probe grounding were less than perfect, so that may explain the difference between the two ON voltages.

So the ecu is sending during cranking. Does this eliminate the injectors entirely as a cause or is there something about them that's left to check? Something to think about while I'm trundling around doing the next test. :)

If injectors are out, that brings us back to fuel pressure, doesn't it?



By ground repeatedly I mean ground the injector simulating a duty cycle. If you ground it for more than 3 seconds (?) it can overheat the coil inside the injector.
Didn't see this until now. My cranking didn't last more than about 4 secs. I just wanted to crank long enough to see a reading and see that it was stable. Hopefully it didn't hurt anything.

I'm going to head back out now and do a quick crank with my fuel cut-off switch bypassed. It's performed just fine up until now (I used it to kill the pump during my key-On checks of the primary connector's voltages) but I'm going to do this anyway to completely rule it out. I do show 12v when I meter in series with the switch.

[edit] No change with the fuel-cut switch bypassed.

The battery's going back on the charger after this. :)

ifryrice 01-26-10 07:34 PM


Originally Posted by Amur_ (Post 9763619)
What I've found says to me that *zero* fuel is entering the chamber. I inserted barely 2 cubic centimeters of fuel into the chamber. An online converter tells us that this is: 0.067 628 045 403 ounce. And that's before the loss to the exhaust sweep. In other words, the car nearly started with sweet fuck-all for gas in the chamber. Sweet fuck-all > nothing.

Sweet fuck-all + almost none at all = boom? It's hard to say if it was just enough to ignite the already extremely lean mixture. Just saying ;)


Originally Posted by Amur_ (Post 9763619)
Ah, but if they're intact and part of them is immersed in a liquid like coolant, which goes back to Karack's previous assertions, then that might be a problem.

I'm closing in on this. Not much further to go, I hope. :)

If the injector itself is submerged, but the wiring isn't wet, then there's probably nothing to worry about and they'd be working fine. But since you said you pulled them out or whatever already, I'd imagine that puddles long gone.

Do you have a vacuum gauge to see what you're pulling during cranking? Have you tried the simple test of jamming a screwdriver into the AFM and cranking? I had both primary injector rubber seals leaking air on my '89 and it wouldn't so much as fart during cranking, no fuel/anything at all that I could find, would start and run on starting fluid then stall. Had someone crank the car and moved the AFM door by hand, got it to start sputtering then eventually hit the sweet spot and it started right up and I could get it to idle perfectly by holding the door open. I don't know if it works on S4's, the last time I tried on my '87 I didn't have any luck getting it to start (it did at least fart a few times, which it didn't before).

lastphaseofthis 01-26-10 07:34 PM

did you jump the intial set connector and check voltage at pump. or at least the wires by the strut tower on the driver side rear wheel.

Amur_ 01-26-10 07:41 PM


Originally Posted by ifryrice (Post 9763875)
If the injector itself is submerged, but the wiring isn't wet, then there's probably nothing to worry about and they'd be working fine. But since you said you pulled them out or whatever already, I'd imagine that puddles long gone.

Coolant might have entered the loom elsewhere...



Do you have a vacuum gauge to see what you're pulling during cranking?
Nope.



Have you tried the simple test of jamming a screwdriver into the AFM and cranking?
Nope. Interesting story. I'll try it.




did you jump the intial set connector and check voltage at pump. or at least the wires by the strut tower on the driver side rear wheel.
I haven't. I'll do this along with the AFM test.

KhanArtisT 01-26-10 07:55 PM

You should be checking for fuel pump operation, voltage and pressure. The AFM should not be suspected, if it is then disconnect it and try to start the car. With the AFM disconnected the car WILL start everytime but shut off immediately.

My bet is on fuel pump voltage. Its very common on these cars and you may have to re-wire it. Check voltage to the pump, jump it or do whatever but thats where your problem is.

Amur_ 01-26-10 07:59 PM


Originally Posted by KhanArtisT (Post 9763936)
You should be checking for fuel pump operation, voltage and pressure.

Agreed.



The AFM should not be suspected, if it is then disconnect it and try to start the car. With the AFM disconnected the car WILL start everytime but shut off immediately.
This has been a few times without success.

ifryrice 01-26-10 08:17 PM


Originally Posted by KhanArtisT (Post 9763936)
You should be checking for fuel pump operation, voltage and pressure. The AFM should not be suspected, if it is then disconnect it and try to start the car. With the AFM disconnected the car WILL start everytime but shut off immediately.

My bet is on fuel pump voltage. Its very common on these cars and you may have to re-wire it. Check voltage to the pump, jump it or do whatever but thats where your problem is.

You don't jam it open because it's faulty, you jam it open to simulate more air flow to increase fuel. It's a rather reliable way of identifying troublesome vacuum leaks or other ECU lean related issues.

KhanArtisT 01-26-10 08:25 PM

That makes sense, though I don't understand where that would take you in the troubleshooting procedure if it did start the car.

Rule vacuum leaks out of the possible culprits completely. A vacuum leak will not keep the car from starting, it will start and shut off immediately or won't want to idle even in the most extreme cases.

I've left a few vacuum ports open, and even left part of the LIM unbolted. Each time the car started but didn't want to idle. Give it a quick look, if nothing obvious/big is unplugged then thats not where the problem is.

ifryrice 01-26-10 08:32 PM


Originally Posted by KhanArtisT (Post 9764000)
That makes sense, though I don't understand where that would take you in the troubleshooting procedure if it did start the car.

Rule vacuum leaks out of the possible culprits completely. A vacuum leak will not keep the car from starting, it will start and shut off immediately or won't want to idle even in the most extreme cases.

I've left a few vacuum ports open, and even left part of the LIM unbolted. Each time the car started but didn't want to idle. Give it a quick look, if nothing obvious/big is unplugged then thats not where the problem is.

I've had quite a few cars that wouldn't start due to vacuum leaks. Compression plays a large part into how much leaks affect starting though.

It's possible the FP relay/etc got wet/flooded, it's near enough to the scene of the original problem. You're running out of things to check.

jjcobm 01-26-10 08:39 PM

1 Attachment(s)
This is interesting.... this is definetly the radiator explosion from hell.... Only thing left to check is fuel pump, how odd out of all things....

Section F1-57 in the S5 FSM shows some information pertaining to the fuel pump resistor relay & circuit opening relay. I can't tell you were those are located though as I've never looked for them. Might be a good idea to check those out....

Edit: I got beat to the post, ifryrice posted the same thing about the fuel pump relay. If it's one of those relays located right in front of the radiator, that is the suspect! Hopefully it's around that area, maybe someone other users can clarify where those two relays are located...

Amur_ 01-26-10 08:50 PM


Originally Posted by ifryrice (Post 9764019)
It's possible the FP relay/etc got wet/flooded, it's near enough to the scene of the original problem. You're running out of things to check.

This got me to look in the FSM, since I don't recall a relay being involved at all. While scrolling back and forth I was reminded of something that happened when I took the manifolds off but at the time it didn't occur to me to post it.

When I was ready to remove the soft fuel lines from the secondary rail, I pulled the return line first. I *think* I heard a little gurgling after this, I'm not sure (it's been a few days and I wasn't paying attention to that.) Then I moved over to the delivery hose, wrapping a rag around it to contain any spray.

Nothing. The rag didn't soak, no sensation through the rag of an expulsion and no sound of it. Gas did run out of the secondary rail until it was empty, that took a while.

Damn, I wish I'd remembered this sooner. :blush: I award 100 forum bucks to ifryrice! :worship:

So... the pump is sending but pressure is less than spiffy. I think the next steps are that relay and then the PRC solenoid, page F1-58. After that, the pump itself. Luckily I have spares of everything. :)



maybe someone other users can clarify where those two relays are located...
I'll look in a sec, but I'd expect it's mounted along that rail that sits between the headlights. If it is, then the relay itself would have been protected from the blast by the plastic barrier. The relay's wiring may be another story, though...

jjcobm 01-26-10 08:54 PM


Originally Posted by Amur_ (Post 9764059)
Damn, I wish I'd remembered this sooner. :blush: I award 100 forum bucks to ifryrice! :worship:

You better award me too, I got you F1-57:bigthumb:

Amur_ 01-26-10 08:57 PM

I'm all out of forum bucks for tonight, but I did catch you this delicious bass.


http://www.lrn.usace.army.mil/op/cor...emouthBass.jpg

ifryrice 01-26-10 08:59 PM

Haha, the fuel pump relay, is located behind the passanger headlight, bolted on the inside infront of the filter location. Right next to the radiator....

Amur_ 01-26-10 09:03 PM


Originally Posted by ifryrice (Post 9764080)
Haha, the fuel pump relay, is located behind the passanger headlight, bolted on the inside infront of the filter location. Right next to the radiator....

I was referring to the circuit opening relay on the lower half of the scanned FSM page. The pump relay was sheltered by the custom airbox.

jjcobm 01-26-10 09:05 PM

I'm in suspense, waiting to see what happens. Hope you get it started now..... That pressure regulator control solenoid (on F1-58 like you said) seems possible too, regardless it seems you are on the right track now...

Amur_ 01-26-10 09:06 PM


Originally Posted by jjcobm (Post 9764096)
I'm in suspense, waiting to see what happens. Hope you get it started now.....

Me, too. I wanna get my ass out to see Avatar. lol

ifryrice 01-26-10 09:17 PM


Originally Posted by Amur_ (Post 9764089)
I was referring to the circuit opening relay on the lower half of the scanned FSM page. The pump relay was sheltered by the custom airbox.

The COR is located under the dash, so I don't follow? I think that you've got some wet connections somewhere that's causing large voltage drop.

That B/Y wire you tested, should have battery voltage and runs from the coils, all the way back to the injectors. That could be a troublesome sign if the injectors are only seeing +6v on the battery side (they should show +12V on both wires when not cranking/running). If the B/W wire is also being dragged down, it runs to all your solenoids/fuel pump/etc through the circuit-opening and fuel pump relay.

Edit: Oh, doing the COR tests will show you the results of the B/W to see if the voltage is dropped before it even heads to the FP, if that's what you meant.

Amur_ 01-26-10 09:42 PM


Originally Posted by ifryrice (Post 9764131)
The COR is located under the dash, so I don't follow?

I see it now. B3-01. That's the one the fuel-kill switch is tied into. B3-02 is the resistor pack, although the wiring diagrams don't call it that. Maybe they ran out of ink? ;)



I think that you've got some wet connections somewhere that's causing large voltage drop.
A few people are probably thinking that now, and some have been thinking it for a while. :)



That B/Y wire you tested, should have battery voltage and runs from the coils, all the way back to the injectors.
That's been done. Other than the leading coil dying, I've confirmed that the voltage throughout the MAIN RELAY->CAS->ECU->COIL/INJECTOR circuit is normal and behaving normally.



That could be a troublesome sign if the injectors are only seeing +6v on the battery side (they should show +12V on both wires when not cranking/running).
They were showing a little over 10 volts, not 6v, and that was a sign that the battery needed to be topped up again.



Edit: Oh, doing the COR tests will show you the results of the B/W to see if the voltage is dropped before it even heads to the FP, if that's what you meant.
Nope. 12v is going to the fuel-cut switch, which says to me the B/W coming from the ignition is fine. I'm going to test it because it's part of the only system left that is culpable, and I want to eliminate it quickly and get it out of the way.

The [F] harness between B3-01 and B3-02 sticks to the driver's side until it hooks in and past the rad. If the rad blew out on both the rear AND the front sides, the loom may have been hit.

ifryrice 01-26-10 10:01 PM

Running out of things left to check! Do you hear the 'running water' sound with the FP jumpered? That's usually a good indicator that the pumps not completely toast (it needs to make decent pressure to escape the FPR). I guess all you've got left is checking the voltage at the fuel pump, if that checks out fine I guess you could measure the injectors spray turning the CAS by hand, but that's a lot of work. It's hard to try to think of what could've happened. Unless water somehow got in the fuel pump relay/resistor housing and is screwing stuff up it's hard to think of what would cause it to act up.

If the FP voltage checks out fine (while not running and running). The injectors could be firing too little fuel or theECU is fubared.

RotaryEvolution 01-27-10 12:47 AM


Originally Posted by jjcobm (Post 9764037)
This is interesting.... this is definetly the radiator explosion from hell.... Only thing left to check is fuel pump, how odd out of all things....

Section F1-57 in the S5 FSM shows some information pertaining to the fuel pump resistor relay & circuit opening relay. I can't tell you were those are located though as I've never looked for them. Might be a good idea to check those out....

Edit: I got beat to the post, ifryrice posted the same thing about the fuel pump relay. If it's one of those relays located right in front of the radiator, that is the suspect! Hopefully it's around that area, maybe someone other users can clarify where those two relays are located...

the resistor is behind the RF headlight on the firewall in the engine bay. the relay is right above the gas pedal inside the cab.

MazdaMike02 01-27-10 09:40 AM

Use noid lights to check injector pulses way easier. They're like 10 bucks at Princess Auto.

BTW ATF destroys carbon (It has a high detergent value), it also makes rubber seals swell and possibly rupture eventually. Which means you'll probably start burning oil if you put ATF In.

Any petroleum based product (even aerosols with petroleum based propellants) will destroy rubber.. Unless the rubber is specifically to be submersed or in contact with any petroleum.

IE Cup seals in your master cylinder or clutch master, they are designed to be submersed in brake fluid.

But your trailing arm bushings or control arm bushings...if you spray WD40 on them its a definite safety hazard. They may stop squeaking, but they can rip or separate at any time.

BTW this is in regards to the use of ATF in our engines...I'm not just talking out my ass here lol.

lastphaseofthis 01-27-10 10:22 AM

so what was the voltage at the fuel pump harness into the tank after this test:

did you jump the intial set connector and check voltage at pump. or at least the wires by the strut tower on the driver side rear wheel.

Amur_ 01-27-10 01:29 PM

I got away early and am heading to the car shortly. :)

When looking at the scanned jpg from the FSM, one of the Conditions for the COR test is "Measuring plate: open." Can someone clarify just what this is referring to?

https://www.rx7club.com/attachment.p...2&d=1264560285




BTW ATF destroys carbon (It has a high detergent value)
Imho, once you're dealing with hardened carbon of the kind we're talking about within these engines, detergent is ineffectual. If it wasn't, rebuilders would be scrubbing used rotors and housings with Palmolive instead of using parts washers and solvents. I have also read posts on this board from different members attesting to having attempted to clean disassembled parts (like rotors) of carbon using ATF, or of having left parts sitting in ATF without any success at all. Perhaps they should have tried Palmolive... ;)



it also makes rubber seals swell and possibly rupture eventually.
Given enough time, sure. Aaron Cake, a vocal opponent of ATF, has said that it was several months before o-rings left to sit in ATF had been damaged (although he failed to specify if, or how frequently, he'd checked on them in the interim.) Given that someone using ATF *properly* will only be adding a few ccs of it to each chamber, and that the majority of it will be expelled shortly thereafter with the remainder being either burned off or diluted beyond concern, I fail to see the problem.

jjcobm 01-27-10 02:01 PM


Originally Posted by Amur_ (Post 9765470)
I got away early and am heading to the car shortly. :)

When looking at the scanned jpg from the FSM, one of the Conditions for the COR test is "Measuring plate: open." Can someone clarify just what this is referring to?

I'm not 100% sure, but I'm pretty positive they are referring to the AFM, air flow meter.....

RotaryRocket88 01-27-10 02:02 PM


Originally Posted by Amur_ (Post 9765470)
I got away early and am heading to the car shortly. :)

When looking at the scanned jpg from the FSM, one of the Conditions for the COR test is "Measuring plate: open." Can someone clarify just what this is referring to?

That would be the measuring plate / door in the AFM on an S4. On an S5 is what, a little cone? This would be to switch the fuel pump on.

Edit: jjcobm beat me to it :)

Amur_ 01-27-10 02:04 PM

Got it. Thanks. :) I'll physically open it, to do it properly.

Amur_ 01-27-10 04:52 PM

So close!


Fuel Pump Resistor Relay

a-b should be 0, reading bounced around then settled on 3.0

c-d should be 60-92, got 70.7

e-f should be 0.70-0.94, got 2.7

So that's not too healthy.


PRC - passed both tests


Circuit Opening Relay (here's where the action started)

When backprobing and then cranking Fp, Fe and E1 the car started and then stalled (those are the ones I marked down as having started, it may have also started on the others.) It ran like crap and would stall out within 5 seconds. I tried revving to keep it going but it would stall out every time. I didn't persist in trying to keep her running - the goal was to complete the testing, and I didn't want to sit there revving her too much while she was running so poorly.

**bold indicates out of spec reading

-----------Fp------Fc------B------STA------E1
ON-------0--------0------12------0--------12
AFM------0--------0------12------0--------12
START---12-------0------12-----12-------0.3

E1 is supposed to be 0 in all tests. The other two 0s should be 12s.


Fuel Pump

fuel pump connector, a-b continuity - OK

L/G with key On - 0v
L/G with key Start - 12v and engine started.

And it was a normal sounding and feeling start, not the ugliness of the FPR starts. She started smoothly, ran smoothly, revved smoothly and I was able to get out and walk up to and watch the engine bay. I didn't notice any oddities. She didn't do the 3k start-up and the idle was up around 2.5k. As time passed that slowly dropped, until at about 3 minutes she stalled out. No sputtering, just died. I got back in and cranked it (without disturbing the multimeter) but she just spun.

After all of this, I then jumpered the pump and listened around the manifolds. No sound of fuel moving. What I am hearing is the sound of a small motor running somewhere close to the firewall between the wiper motor and the middle of the car. I wasn't able to localize it more than that. I really need to hit the local army surplus and pick up a stethoscope when all this is done. :)

Time for a break to thaw my toes and make some food. :yum:

ifryrice 01-27-10 06:13 PM

EDIT: Whoops, i made a mistake, the FP relay is closed by default, not open. Corrected.

Well, I'll start with the COR.

Fc is the ECU's signal to trigger the pump, it also has the test connector attatched to it. If i was showing 0v (or ground), it could mean either the connector was jumpered, the ECU wasn't sending any signal at all (apparently it sends +12V when it's not supposed to be on), or the ECU was trying to turn it on.

Fp is the power output to the FP relay/resistor. The S5 FP signal is triggered by the ECU depending upon the AFM's position, and I think that it doesn't open that if the cars not running, but I could be wrong. It should see +12V from the ECU whenever the ECU triggers it... That one's kind of unusual and worries me.

E1 is supposed to be straght to ground. This circuit is what's used to turn the pump on during cranking. The test results show that this works, though why there is +12V on the other side is beyond me and is somewhat suspect, but I don't think it's your problem just yet.


Now, onto the FP resistor/relay.

A-B is interesting, but could just be from corrosion/etc. Clean the connectors.
C-D is the relay's coil, which looks good meaning it should pull the relay closed.
E-F is the resistor to drop the FP voltage under certain conditions... with a reading like that I'm thinking it could be dropping your cranking voltage too much, as during cranking the power comes throgh that resistor directly to the FP.

I'm starting to think your FP relay/resistor is wet/connector have coolant/etc. The fact that it started at all after playing around with those connectors just goes to further provide evidence for that. I'd take them apart, clean them out, spray them out, wire brush em(I'm thorough!), and reassemble and see what happens. It's also possible your AFM has some water or something in it that's causing the Fp AFM test not to work. Clean that one out too.


Edit: Oh, for the AFM Fp test, you can jumper the fuel pump test connector and it should be effectively the same as if the ECU were doing it, which would allow you to verify that it's sending out +12V to the FP relay/resistor from the COR if the ECU triggers it, which would then lead you back to the FP relay/resistor (where you should probably do some voltage checking).

So, to test voltage at the FP/R do the following (make sure to backprobe these, and not disconnect the harness, with the car ON and the FP connector jumpered). This should cause the COR to turn the FP on, but on the low voltage setting.

Check voltage of A, C, and E pins (All are L/R color, same pin layout as on the resistance checking you already did), all should be +12V with FP connector jumpered/key to start/during running.

D (G/R color) could be 0v or 12v, depending upon what the ECU is doing.... If it's turning the FP onto full power, this will be ground, otherwise it'll probably be +12V, you can tell if this is being used by the outputs below.

F (L/G color) should be +12v, UNLESS the ECU is turning on low power mode, then it should read a value less than you read on the A,C,E pins, this is the power output from the resistor to the fuel pump itself.

B (L/G color, sucks they're the same?) should be +12V unless the ECU is trying to turn on the low power output, in which case it should read 0v.

Amur_ 01-27-10 08:54 PM


Originally Posted by ifryrice (Post 9766149)
Fc is the ECU's signal to trigger the pump, it also has the test connector attatched to it. If i was showing 0v (or ground), it could mean either the connector was jumpered, the ECU wasn't sending any signal at all (apparently it sends +12V when it's not supposed to be on), or the ECU was trying to turn it on.

The jumper was not used during this these tests.



A-B is interesting, but could just be from corrosion/etc. Clean the connectors.
What I could see of the connectors was spotless. And the entirety of both connectors was dry.



I'm starting to think your FP relay/resistor is wet/connector have coolant/etc.
Except I expected them to be shielded by the airbox, and this has proven to be correct. There is no visible trace of coolant on the FPR, its connectors nor its general vicinity.



I'd take them apart, clean them out, spray them out, wire brush em(I'm thorough!), and reassemble and see what happens. It's also possible your AFM has some water or something in it that's causing the Fp AFM test not to work. Clean that one out too.
Okie.


Battery at 10.5 (recharge time again)

Without anything being cleaned or otherwise altered from earlier:

a - 9.7
c - 9.9
e - 9.88

d - 6.65
f - 9.7
b - 9.79

ifryrice 01-27-10 09:01 PM

It's interesting that D's down at 6.6, that's about the drop I'd expect when the ECU is dropping voltage, but since it backfeeds (the wires are connected later on after the relay prior to the FP), I figure it would've gone up.

I realize I didn't account for this on the B pin either, it'd read the lower voltage as well.

In any case, it doesn't make much sense since everything checks out as far as relays/etc go (except possibly the voltage drop being too much, or the COR not doing it's purpose all of the time). I think you're down to the FP itself and watching the voltage at the pump itself. This is definitely a pain in the ass. It would seem that it had something to do with wiring as it went from not firing at all to starting just from backprobing/etc.

At this point.... I would do the absolute simplest thing and run a battery fed +12V straight to the pump. Bypassing the COR/FPR completely and seeing if the car will start/idle without stalling afterwards. It'll get the fuel pump/sock/pressure regulator/fuel filter/lines all off the board. If it refuses to start even still, then I'd suspect something from the group I just mentioned.

Amur_ 01-27-10 09:37 PM

Ran a line from batt + to L/G and cranked. She fired up and idled. Stalled after 10 seconds. But I think I know why that's happening.

The gas is low. Just a bit above E. Not a big deal except... the car is parked perpendicular on a slope and the pump/intake are on the high side. I think I should put some more gas in there before I try again.

ifryrice 01-27-10 09:53 PM

Well, I guess it's a good sign that it at least fired in that condition. I'd still try again with more fuel/etc eventually. After that I'd start from the beginning again. (If, it turns out the pump is fine).

Go back to the COR, jumper pin B to pin Fp, test that the car starts/runs just fine. If not, the issues either in the wiring, or the FP/R and you can skip everything below.

If that checks out, ground Fc and repeat the above steps. If that fails the relay likely is having issues and should be replaced.

If that works then I would try grounding the EV1 pin and checking to verify that the car starts. If it stalls shortly afterwards it would indicate some issue between the ECU wiring and the COR. If it starts/stays running, then the issue could be a faulty ground (EV1 should always be grounded).

If that doesn't work, jumper B to STA and try again. This would indicate a power failure from the IGN switch starting position and the COR.

That should help identify/eliminate the wiring to or the COR itself completely. If the COR stuff doesn't work at all, then it's got to be at the FP/R, and that looked good from the voltage tests. All you would need to do there is jumper any of the L/R to either of the L/G's and see what happens. Either one of them should get power back to the FP.

Amur_ 01-27-10 10:05 PM

Sounds good. Thanks for staying abreast and offering the guidance. Electrical is not my strong suit. :)

misterstyx69 01-27-10 10:07 PM

just an Observation..but the AFM connector is about where the Upper rad hose is..
my Thinking is that when the Rad exploded,it Could have got the connections wet,or even screwed up the AFM.have you tried another AFM?

Amur_ 01-27-10 10:13 PM


Originally Posted by misterstyx69 (Post 9766664)
just an Observation..but the AFM connector is about where the Upper rad hose is..
my Thinking is that when the Rad exploded,it Could have got the connections wet,or even screwed up the AFM.have you tried another AFM?

The AFM plug was and still is 180 degrees away from the rad. It was sheltered by the entire snorkel. I have also repeatedly disconnected the plug without noticing any liquid nor dampness.

ifryrice 01-27-10 10:15 PM


Originally Posted by misterstyx69 (Post 9766664)
just an Observation..but the AFM connector is about where the Upper rad hose is..
my Thinking is that when the Rad exploded,it Could have got the connections wet,or even screwed up the AFM.have you tried another AFM?

Even if the AFM wasn't sending a valid signal back to the ECU, the COR would power the fuel pump during cranking, so it would start then stall almost immediately. It's something to check into though later because his Fc value wasn't showing up right, but for now I don't think it's the primary issue.


Originally Posted by Amur_
Sounds good. Thanks for staying abreast and offering the guidance. Electrical is not my strong suit. :)

When I can't work on my own car, pretending I can work on others serves to cure that craving. :lol:

misterstyx69 01-27-10 10:21 PM

My car is under snow,so i can't work on it..or help with hands ON..sort of thing.
I am just Throwin a suggestion or two out there..I hope it isnt Too "far out"..
..I am gonna Love to see WTF it was or is though..
Good Luck Amur..STYX!~

Amur_ 01-28-10 06:07 PM

Dumped in 2 gallons and cranked. Nothing, she just spun for about 4 seconds. This was without reconnecting +batt to the fuel pump. I paused for a moment, then pushed the accelerator to the floor and cranked again (which I had been doing during the Start part of the COR tests, when the car first began starting again.)

She fired up. And stayed running. Again, no 3k start-up but she did sit comfortably a bit below 2.5k. I sat and looked at the gauges and waited. Everything seemed normal. I popped the hood and got out. Like yesterday, all seemed normal.

But there was one thing yesterday that I didn't report, that occurred again. There is some kind of smoke or steam coming from somewhere around the BAC/secondaries/under the snorkel. There's no colour to it and no smell that I can identify. Definitely not gas nor coolant. It's becoming a genuine concern because it hasn't lessened at all. I was looking around as much as I could but there's a mess of wiring and piping in there and I couldn't see anything that looked like a source.

I think it may be smoke rather than steam. I stuck my face right into a cloud of it (it's coming out of there in a steady stream) and it stung my eyes, something steam doesn't do. Or maybe it's contaminated steam. :shrug: I don't want to move the car 5 feet until I figure it out or it goes away.

So at least she's running again. :) I think I'm going to run a switched 12v from the +batt to the pump.

I'm going to do ifryrice's COR tests tomorrow. It's too cold and dark out there now - I was out there for maybe 15 minutes with light cotton gloves on and all of my fingers were numb when I came back in.

ifryrice 01-28-10 06:22 PM

Did you check those coolant lines that run from under the manifolds? They like to burst/fail quite a bit, especially when overheated. I can't think of any way exhaust would be getting up to that area, or what else could be burning off. There's only coolant/fuel around that area. Either is worth checking into though.

So it stayed running just after you pumped the throttle and didn't stall out/etc again? It'll suck if it doesn't come back again soon because you won't really be able to identify exactly what it was, and if it comes back later (while driving) it'd suck even more.

Running a switched 12V has it's negatives, such as if the car flips/crashes/etc, it'll never turn off. You could remove the use of the resistor/FP relay, and install a replacement for the CoR, but that gets tricky because the signal from the 'Start' position to turn on the pump is +12V and the ecu signal is GND. You'd either need two relays, or another relay like the COR that has two coils. (Or just replace the COR with another good one, and bypass the FPR/run your own wires from the COR back).

Good luck!

Amur_ 01-28-10 06:28 PM

I think the long-term solution is replacement of both the FPR and COR with known-working units ASAP. The +batt would be an interim 'insurance' move.

This looks rather like the fuel system/pressure problem was just a coincidence. We haven't found a cause yet, have we? This car has a helluva sense of timing. ;)

ifryrice 01-28-10 06:39 PM

Nothing in particular, unless something got wet and caused some kind of voltage drop to any of the power/gnd's the relays would require. It's stupid things like this that drive me nuts though, I hate when problems aren't consistent. Makes them so much more difficult to resolve properly. At least the good news is the motor/etc's fine after the overheat, that's rare in and of itself!

MazdaMike02 01-28-10 06:50 PM

The fuel pump relay makes the difference of sending either 9 or 12 volts to the fuel pump. If it failed in one position it could probably be only sending that 9 volts which would probably not be enough fuel to start. Since your running a constant hot 12v to the pump thats bypassing the problem. Sounds like the fuel pump relay has an internal short or maybe the contacts are just worn right out from use.

ifryrice 01-28-10 06:56 PM

He's already verified that it was putting out the proper power, and the car should start with the pump running on the 9v too. (probably not the 6v he got when he tested it with a near dead battery). The problem seems to either be the COR, or the wiring between the COR->FPR->FP.

Amur_ 01-28-10 06:58 PM


Originally Posted by ifryrice (Post 9768681)
At least the good news is the motor/etc's fine after the overheat, that's rare in and of itself!

Mmmmm... something we'll have to disagree on. I think people are a little too fast to jump on the Zomg It Overheated Rebuild Time Oh Noes bandwagon.

https://www.rx7club.com/showpost.php...3&postcount=32

(rather than re-type it)



Sounds like the fuel pump relay has an internal short or maybe the contacts are just worn right out from use.
Could be. The sooner I get a replacement in there, the sooner I can stop worrying about it. :)

Anyone know offhand if the s4 and s5 CORs are identical? I'll compare the FSM tests for them when I get a chance.

MazdaMike02 01-28-10 07:05 PM

Well depending on his compression numbers and fuel injector condition 9v may not be enough to run the engine.

I know on my 7 I had proper fuel pressure and It still wouldn't run properly, I swapped the pump out for the exact same type from another s5 and it solved my problem..That and I discovered when you don't have the bolts in to hold the pump the pressure escapes through those holes and it wont hold pressure.

Amur_ 01-28-10 07:07 PM

Missed two.


Originally Posted by ifryrice (Post 9768639)
Did you check those coolant lines that run from under the manifolds?

I didn't inspect them closely (I was focused on other things and didn't think of it,) but there was no coolant present in that area at all to suggest that they might have failed.



I can't think of any way exhaust would be getting up to that area
I premix and use a high-flow cat. If the smoke was at all exhaust related I'd know immediately. And then when I regained consciousness I'd probably post about it. ;)

ifryrice 01-28-10 07:28 PM


Originally Posted by Amur_ (Post 9768768)
Missed two.



I didn't inspect them closely (I was focused on other things and didn't think of it,) but there was no coolant present in that area at all to suggest that they might have failed.




I premix and use a high-flow cat. If the smoke was at all exhaust related I'd know immediately. And then when I regained consciousness I'd probably post about it. ;)

I know what you mean, so it's either fuel/water/coolant, or plastic/something else? Most of the time if it's a small dribble/etc, you won't notice any coolant, but you can often find the white powdery residue it leaves behind from the area it burns off of. Just something to check for later (if it doesn't go away on it's own at least).


Originally Posted by MazdaMike02 (Post 9768756)
Well depending on his compression numbers and fuel injector condition 9v may not be enough to run the engine.

I know on my 7 I had proper fuel pressure and It still wouldn't run properly, I swapped the pump out for the exact same type from another s5 and it solved my problem..That and I discovered when you don't have the bolts in to hold the pump the pressure escapes through those holes and it wont hold pressure.

We've already verified the FP/R seems to be working properly. I don't understand the second part you said though, if you had proper fuel pressure, swapping to another pump wouldn't make any difference at all unless it was exceeding the volume capacity of the original FPR, in which case it'd rise the fuel pressure above what you had considered proper already. Unless you tested the pressure at key 'ON', and the pressure dropped significantly when the injectors opened or something.

Amur_ 01-28-10 07:35 PM

I'm familiar with the white powdery trail bit from water pump failures. I'm confident I would have noticed one had it been visible up there.

Right now the only explanation is water, b/c of the odourless aspect. Everything else has a distinct smell to it. After the engine snuffed and I had her off the road and stopped, I did try to pour water into the system by disconnecting the upper rad hose from the elbow above the pump and then pouring water into the hose. I doubt I would have made a great mess of it, but it's likely that was at least a little spillage. If some of that spillage found places to pool and freeze, I may be witnessing vaporization and sublimation... But it sure is taking its time.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands