2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Which One To Get????????????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-03, 04:27 PM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: austin TX
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy Which One To Get????????????

hello peeps i am new to this forum and i was wundering is sum1 could help me out....i plan on getting a second generation rx 7 and i dont know if i should go all out and spend more $$ on a turbo or if i could get a na and make it a turbo.... and if i did would it be as or more efective than the factory turbo or would i have to buy extra parts such as piston????
Old 03-22-03, 04:29 PM
  #2  
TII 4 SALE!

 
Rx7Nub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 688
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rotary engines dont have pistons.
Old 03-22-03, 04:34 PM
  #3  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: austin TX
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry bout that i was in hurrylol now i feel like a dumbass.
Old 03-22-03, 04:37 PM
  #4  
Refined Valley Dude

 
Amur_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kitchener, Ontario (Hamilton's armpit)
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Converting an NA to turbo would best be done as a project (ie you're not in too much of a hurry to get it done.)

Timewise and $-wise, you'd probably be best off buying a TII outright.

There are several threads on NA/turbo conversions in the part of the Forum. Search.
Old 03-22-03, 08:31 PM
  #5  
SOLD THE RX-7!

 
Scott 89t2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
do not buy an N/A hoping to make it turbo... you will spend 2x more money then buying a turbo in the first place. plus way way to much work.
Old 03-22-03, 08:43 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
YakATK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Driver's Seat
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are both good in their own ways. If you buy an NA keep it NA and just do all you can to make it rip. If you go the Turbo route then it will be easier to get more power, but can end up being a hassle as well sometimes. NA's are awesome, but the Turbo models definatly have more potential if your looking for something to get lots of power out of and keep it daily driverable. I would say look around and buy the best deal you can find for what it is, whether it is NA or Turbo.
Old 03-22-03, 09:20 PM
  #7  
Full Member

 
rotard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: toronto
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also think about the extra $s you'll spend making a turbo really go, maintenance issues and the extra gas. I've got an N/A, and I'm really happy with it. But the extra power would be nice...
Old 03-22-03, 09:55 PM
  #8  
still love the FC

 
cbrinega's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.aaroncake.net/RX-7/naturbo.htm

Look at the above page for information on a custom conversion. Some people have swapped a complete Turbo II drivetrain, but neither conversion is "common" or "typical."

Like others will say, if you want a turbo, then it's generally easier and less costly to just buy one that came that way.

Normally aspirated cars are fun too, but don't expect one to outrun a good running V8 in a lightweight car. These cars can stick with good running V6 style cars such as the Eclipse.

Either way, you are likely to end up with a car that needs significant repairs because of its age. It is fun to repair these cars and watch them perform better with each thing you fix.

One thing people usually ignore is gearing. Any car can be made significantly quicker in the lower gears (say 0 to 80 mph range) by altering the gear ratio. You can buy a lower gear for the differential for these cars, and you always have the option of using tires that are not as tall to gain more torque at the wheels. The cost of this change will be gas mileage and a loss of accuracy in the speedometer.

I recommend getting a ride in or driving both an N/A and turbo RX-7 before you decide what you want.
Old 03-22-03, 10:00 PM
  #9  
Refined Valley Dude

 
Amur_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kitchener, Ontario (Hamilton's armpit)
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by cbrinega
Normally aspirated cars are fun too, but don't expect one to outrun a good running V8 in a lightweight car. These cars can stick with good running V6 style cars such as the Eclipse.

And you'll rape ALL of them in the corners.
Old 03-22-03, 11:34 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
Kanaida's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Amur_
And you'll rape ALL of them in the corners.

not a z06............


-Kanaida
Old 03-23-03, 05:55 PM
  #11  
Full Member

 
Swift_7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Abilene, TX
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For you, I would suggest buying a Turbo II. It takes experience with rotarys and rx-7's to do a turbo conversion. Just stick with a Turbo II, and do some modifications.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 AM.