2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

new turbo manifold pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-05, 10:29 PM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
wpgrexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: not in winterpeg anymore
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
new turbo manifold pics

heres what I spent my weekend building. It is made out of very thick wall steel. Flanges are 1/2 inch thick. Thanks to Marc from JHB Performance for getting the flanges for me. It is mounting to a s5 stage 3 hybrid to 3 inch exhaust. I plan on getting it ceramic thermal barrier coated.
Attached Thumbnails new turbo manifold pics-picture-014.jpg   new turbo manifold pics-picture-015.jpg   new turbo manifold pics-picture-016.jpg  
Old 04-24-05, 11:24 PM
  #2  
holley guy

 
mwatson184's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: K.C. MO
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That looks about like the placement I want for my t66. I've never seen a custom manifold for the "stock" turbo.

Marques
Old 04-24-05, 11:28 PM
  #3  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
What are you going to do about the oil drain on that, since it's no longer pointing down? And, chances are the weight of the turbo and the long piping, coupled with the heat, is going to crack it (i've tried a setup very similar to that)
Old 04-24-05, 11:43 PM
  #4  
Haven't we ALL heard this

 
Wankel7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,948
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why the work for a stock turbo? Just wondering on the motives to teh design

Looks good though How did you get the bends ?

James
Old 04-25-05, 07:57 AM
  #5  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
I really question why you went through all that trouble just for a stock turbine / turbo...


-Ted
Old 04-25-05, 08:37 AM
  #6  
What you lookin' at?

 
SpeedyRotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
?

?
Originally Posted by wpgrexx
It is mounting to a s5 stage 3 hybrid.
Old 04-25-05, 09:42 AM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
wpgrexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: not in winterpeg anymore
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow a guy cant get no love around here. That wont crack, if you guys would read, it is made of very thick wall steel. Very thick, welds are very strong. this thing wont crack. I have been considering adding a brace that attaches somewhere else near the turbo to assist in holding the weight so it is not all on the studs from the block.

If you think I wasted my time, sure, but it is to get the turbo away from the LIM. Does it not make sense to get it further than an inch away like the stock manifold. Cool air is more powerful air. isnt that like leaving the stock intercooler on the top of the motor, instead of moving it in front of the rad? Anyways, it is not a stock turbo, read first post, this allows so much more access to things as well. Oh and the oil drain will work just fine if you index the turbo, which I have already done. no love here, I guess I should just use the same old stock parts to please the forum,HAHA!!!
Old 04-25-05, 09:58 AM
  #8  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
60lbs on the end of a two foot level bouncing around with 800*C heat is going to crack eventually man, I tried everything to do it this way at first,

As for your further away from the manifold idea, no, it doesn't make sense for what you're saying. The hotside benefits from the heat and strong pulses the rotary engine gives it as it's close in it's path, allowing it to spool faster, spacing it further away reduces these benefits.

/constructive criticism?
Old 04-25-05, 10:09 AM
  #9  
Rotary Freak

 
Bukwild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: DC Area
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
just brace it to the shock tower of the weight of the turbo will be the manifolds demize. Good work on it so far I guess. Might want to have it jet coated inside to help reduce cracking failure.
Old 04-25-05, 10:14 AM
  #10  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
wpgrexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: not in winterpeg anymore
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
60lbs on the end of a two foot level bouncing around with 800*C heat is going to crack eventually man, I tried everything to do it this way at first,

As for your further away from the manifold idea, no, it doesn't make sense for what you're saying. The hotside benefits from the heat and strong pulses the rotary engine gives it as it's close in it's path, allowing it to spool faster, spacing it further away reduces these benefits.

/constructive criticism?
I understand what your saying, but the cooler air I meant was theintake air. Last year when the car was running before the last turbo blew, I could feel the TB and it was cold from the intercooler, but right where the air enters the engine at the LIM it was hot again from the turbo being an inch away on the stock manifold.

besides, is it not the same basic design as a stone mountain racing manifold, or a dragon motorsports manifold. Theirs seem to work just fine. Basically any aftermarket manifold is the same basic design.

I had the same concerns about weight too. It does seem like a lot to be sitting at the end of the pipes, I have been considering how to put in a brace to mount ont a framerail or something to add some support. I am not worried about the pipes cracking under heat, they are 2 inch ID, but the walls of the pipe are about 6 mm thick. Very thick stuff. Same stuff used in headers that have lasted for probably 10 years. I have a buddy that also used the same kind of pipe to make his turbo manifold and it lasted no prblems. Trust me, the pipes are strong enough, probably a little overkill if anything.
Old 04-25-05, 10:24 AM
  #11  
vac leak

 
torean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rutgers
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wpgrexx

Cool air is more powerful air. isnt that like leaving the stock intercooler on the top of the motor, instead of moving it in front of the rad? Anyways, it is not a stock turbo, read first post, this allows so much more access to things as well. Oh and the oil drain will work just fine if you index the turbo, which I have already done. no love here, I guess I should just use the same old stock parts to please the forum,HAHA!!!

huh?...cool air more powerful?....im not sure what u mean by this....u want cooler air at the intake side for obvious reasons...but when u move the IC to the front u creat a bigger volume to pressurize when u want to boost.....the TMIC was put there to make the intake cooling volume as small as possible to prevent the "delayed engine response"......

what i see wrong with this setup:

added exhaust pipes adds volume to the space between engine and turbo...like sonik says...the pulsing effects of the engine is reduced

added length to keep the turbo away from LIM....allows too much surface area for the exhaust gases to cool down....reducing its volume and velocity to spool the snail.then radiating all that heat energy onto the engine bay...but since ur gonna go ahead and do some coating im sure it'll be ok.....

like what the other guys said....its too much trouble to go through for the stock turbo..since the manifold already does what it was designed to do ....keep the intake/exhaust housings away from the engine block.not to mention with all the water/oil lines already there..im sure u'll have to fab up the cooling lines also....but hey..its ur money and ur time....props to ya.....

if it was me...i woulda just sent out the exhaust hotside, manifold and the DP to be coated...and call it a day.....if u want u can even coat the LIM to keep heat out....i dont plan to pull the LIM on a weekly basis anyway...
Old 04-25-05, 10:25 AM
  #12  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
-TAL-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Brampton
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If your gonna go to the trouble of doing that, why not go to a full t04, or something of the like?

The hybrids advantage is that you don't have to do that lol.
Old 04-25-05, 10:32 AM
  #13  
Rotary Powered Boobies

iTrader: (1)
 
luiml73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Miami Beach
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
now you can connect the turbo straight to the FMIC

Old 04-25-05, 12:01 PM
  #14  
Haven't we ALL heard this

 
Wankel7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,948
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wasn't pickn' on you man ... I was just curious on why you did it that way.

Good to see that somebody is DOING something different for a change. Most people post ideas like that and then get bashed on by teh forum. And never do it.

But you DID it and that is cool by me.

Post your results up!

The only thing I would be worried about is the cooling of the exhust before it hits the turbine. Maybe you could exhaust wrap the manifold?

James

Edit: I just re read and saw you wanted to coat the pipes. That should work And you now have plenty of room to put dual EGT probes in if you want.

Last edited by Wankel7; 04-25-05 at 12:08 PM.
Old 04-25-05, 01:43 PM
  #15  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by wpgrexx
I understand what your saying, but the cooler air I meant was theintake air. Last year when the car was running before the last turbo blew, I could feel the TB and it was cold from the intercooler, but right where the air enters the engine at the LIM it was hot again from the turbo being an inch away on the stock manifold.

besides, is it not the same basic design as a stone mountain racing manifold, or a dragon motorsports manifold. Theirs seem to work just fine. Basically any aftermarket manifold is the same basic design.

I had the same concerns about weight too. It does seem like a lot to be sitting at the end of the pipes, I have been considering how to put in a brace to mount ont a framerail or something to add some support. I am not worried about the pipes cracking under heat, they are 2 inch ID, but the walls of the pipe are about 6 mm thick. Very thick stuff. Same stuff used in headers that have lasted for probably 10 years. I have a buddy that also used the same kind of pipe to make his turbo manifold and it lasted no prblems. Trust me, the pipes are strong enough, probably a little overkill if anything.
And most aftermarket manifolds made of welded pipe usually come with a warning that says RACE ONLY: prone to cracking. It happens on almost all of them that are this way, how long it will last? Who knows, but I'm just saying, I'd try to support it somewhere else since it's so much leverage working on those pipes, not trying to bash or anything.
Old 04-25-05, 09:59 PM
  #16  
Senior Member

 
300zx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: manitoba
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is wpgrexx just logged in at my bud's place. Anyways, thanks for the advice. I am planning on adding a couple of braces between the 2 pipes, as well as a brace to the motor, maybe around the waterpump or something to support the weight. I totally agree with the weight issue.

As for the oil and water lines, they are all custom anyways, since this is a mix and match motor. not a true s4 TII block. I really dont think spool up will be affected all that much, I can totally see where your points are coming from with the exhaust pulses, I will live with a little longer spool up in exchange for a colder intake charge and to have more accessibility to things. plus, I think it will look hella cool, and I like to do things different. If it really sucks than I make a different one. My total costs to build it was about 50 bux not including welding rods or gas. So its not like it cost lots.

Once the car is up and running and I take it to a dyno to tune the Haltech I will post results. Hopefully I can prove the naysayers wrong.
Old 04-25-05, 10:14 PM
  #17  
BOOSTED Vert

 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 300zx
This is wpgrexx just logged in at my bud's place. Anyways, thanks for the advice. I am planning on adding a couple of braces between the 2 pipes, as well as a brace to the motor, maybe around the waterpump or something to support the weight. I totally agree with the weight issue.

As for the oil and water lines, they are all custom anyways, since this is a mix and match motor. not a true s4 TII block. I really dont think spool up will be affected all that much, I can totally see where your points are coming from with the exhaust pulses, I will live with a little longer spool up in exchange for a colder intake charge and to have more accessibility to things. plus, I think it will look hella cool, and I like to do things different. If it really sucks than I make a different one. My total costs to build it was about 50 bux not including welding rods or gas. So its not like it cost lots.

Once the car is up and running and I take it to a dyno to tune the Haltech I will post results. Hopefully I can prove the naysayers wrong.
You are not gunna prove anybody wrong with a dyno sheet. Most people are saying that its not practical. The whole point of a hybrid turbo or upgrade is that you can still use the stock DP and manifold and not have to dish out the extra cash for exhaust, WG, manifold, and IC piping. For the cost of the hybrid you coulda just bought another turbo and used your manifold..
Old 04-25-05, 10:48 PM
  #18  
Full Member

 
couturemarc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The exhaust pulses are still separated and with the thermal coatings he will be using it greatly reduce and heat loss in that 18" span.

Not completely sure but i belive he is planning on upgrading the turbo next year.

As i see it the only drawback here is the length of the runners. But really, this is not a completely bad thing.... best i can compare it to is a shotgun; one with a long barrel and the other with a short one. Both will make a mess of whatever is at the end of it. Having the exhaust pulses 12-18" away wont make a huge difference, i think it will be superior to the stock manifold, not to mention all the benefits like less heat transfer to the LIM.

Keep me posted on the results!
Old 04-26-05, 01:05 AM
  #19  
Rotors still spinning

iTrader: (1)
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
His runners aren't so long that there will be any noticable difference in response time or the boost curve. Not heating up the lower intake manifold near as much could make a potential difference though. Nothing wrong with this setup at all.
Old 04-26-05, 01:12 AM
  #20  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Well, he's going to notice some lag since it's so far away from the pulse, as well as the additional bends he has in the manifold, but it is a rather creative way to combat the problem. I tried doing this myself, but with how hot under the hood got, and cracking welds (didn't have a support), I decided against it. Looks very damn good tho!
Old 04-26-05, 01:25 AM
  #21  
BOOSTED Vert

 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe that the stock turbo with the stock manifold, is the most effective combination. The spool is instantanious, and the heat isnt bad all. Now if you have sufficient cooling of the charge air, then manifold heat is not a problem. The low temps of the air plus the added cooling that the fuel gives off should be enough to keep temps down..
Old 04-26-05, 01:28 AM
  #22  
New Project on the Way...

iTrader: (2)
 
jreynish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Yellowknife, NT
Posts: 3,763
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
the lag will be "maybe" 100 RPM, I think the gains (if the manifold doesn't crack) will outweight the loss's of this setup. There is alot of misinformation running arround about turbos... and the like... for instance you are all talking about the exhaust pulses.. if the steel really is thick walled and he does ceramic (or similar) coat it.. and they are indeed mandrel bends, then he will notice AT MOST 100 rpm lag most likely on 50rpm.. do you guy's have any idea how fast the pulses and gasses are moving inside a 2 inch pipe? Same with intercoolers if the desing is good the so called turbo lag due to a front mount is negligable because of the added benefit to spool due to the denser air charge... it is all about ballance folks.

Good work I look forward to seeing the car in manitoba this summer we can compare tubular turbo manifold setups
Old 04-26-05, 03:31 AM
  #23  
The mystery of the prize.

 
pengarufoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay area
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
how much does that header weigh?
Old 04-26-05, 06:44 AM
  #24  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Hmmm...lesse...you move the turbo, but heat will still travel from the exhaust port / exhaust flange / beginning of the turbo manifold upward to the LIM.
Well...I guess you just dropped a few hundred degrees on the ambient.

Would you be willing to do air temp readings in the LIM to show the difference?
Yeah, I thought not.

Longer runners...hmmmm, I'd be surprised if you see a difference.
So you gonna do back-to-back dyno testing?
Yeah, I thought not also...

Never going to crack or fail?
Willing to put some money on that?

Oh, and before you go ragging on us naysayers, go brush up on your English comprehension...
I didn't say it wasn't going to work.
I said it was a waste of time.
Now class...can you tell us what the difference is?


-Ted
Old 04-26-05, 07:24 AM
  #25  
wtf's a piston

 
gerbraldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Englewood, FL
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ouch, so much work for the stock turbo :/ when the stock manifold is so much better


Quick Reply: new turbo manifold pics



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 AM.