New Tach
#7
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Miami, FL, USA
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Damn no ones got anything nice to say! I hate it when people think they can just talk crap about one elses car like nothing. I think the tach is bad ***! Hey RX7Kid, good job installing! If u ever have any questions on installing stuff in a 2nd gen email me. At least im here to HELP people.
Trending Topics
#8
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by Project DereK
Damn no ones got anything nice to say! I hate it when people think they can just talk crap about one elses car like nothing. I think the tach is bad ***! Hey RX7Kid, good job installing! If u ever have any questions on installing stuff in a 2nd gen email me. At least im here to HELP people.
Damn no ones got anything nice to say! I hate it when people think they can just talk crap about one elses car like nothing. I think the tach is bad ***! Hey RX7Kid, good job installing! If u ever have any questions on installing stuff in a 2nd gen email me. At least im here to HELP people.
#10
I wish I was driving!
What is your problem? You try to come off sounding all high and mighty, and yet you are bashing everyone around you.
Who was rude about his car? No one bashed it.
"Need some real advice...""I'm here to HELP people" sure sounds like you consider your opinion to be rated higher than those of others.
I have posted more helpful posts than you have, and everyone here will agree, so keep comments like that to yourself, please.
I agree with the kit. Choice of mounting is not where I would have put it, but limited choices on the RX-7 for mounting is a problem. Looks like a good install overall, and a NICE ******* GUAGE.
I do not see any need to upgrade from the stock one, but if you've got the money, it looks sweet as hell, and you get a shift light and peak hold and great looks to boot.
If you need any advice, feel free to continue posting.
Sean Cathcart
Who was rude about his car? No one bashed it.
"Need some real advice...""I'm here to HELP people" sure sounds like you consider your opinion to be rated higher than those of others.
I have posted more helpful posts than you have, and everyone here will agree, so keep comments like that to yourself, please.
I agree with the kit. Choice of mounting is not where I would have put it, but limited choices on the RX-7 for mounting is a problem. Looks like a good install overall, and a NICE ******* GUAGE.
I do not see any need to upgrade from the stock one, but if you've got the money, it looks sweet as hell, and you get a shift light and peak hold and great looks to boot.
If you need any advice, feel free to continue posting.
Sean Cathcart
#13
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Beaverton,OR
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay it is real, i mounted it there so i would not have a huge clock sitting out in th open soon i will put it in the stock location but intell then that is were it stays , the reason i bought an aftermarket tach is i just instlled a periphrial port motor which i shift at aroud 12000 RPM
#14
Lives on the Forum
Originally posted by riffraff
not increadably accurate.. low red line..
not increadably accurate.. low red line..
Straight out of the 1988 Mazda service manual...tach spec at 7,000 RPM, deviation from 6,965RPM to 7,455RPM.
Low redline?  Do you still run a stock ECU?  I bet you still do...which means running a higher RPM tach is plain useless and a waste of money.
-Ted
#15
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by RX7Kid
the reason i bought an aftermarket tach is i just instlled a periphrial port motor which i shift at aroud 12000 RPM
the reason i bought an aftermarket tach is i just instlled a periphrial port motor which i shift at aroud 12000 RPM
BTW, how does a 4 year old afford a PP?! (Check your profile!)
#16
Super Newbie
Originally posted by RETed
Low redline? Do you still run a stock ECU? I bet you still do...which means running a higher RPM tach is plain useless and a waste of money.
Low redline? Do you still run a stock ECU? I bet you still do...which means running a higher RPM tach is plain useless and a waste of money.
#17
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure the pictures of my guage cluster are still floating around somewhere. Autometer 5" Tach & 5" Speedo in the cluster housing with two smaller guages.
#18
Originally posted by RETed
Hmmm...-0.5% to +6.5% error isn't bad at 7,000RPM-Ted
Hmmm...-0.5% to +6.5% error isn't bad at 7,000RPM-Ted
Is this dangerous!!??
#19
Lives on the Forum
Originally posted by dre_2ooo
So you're saying when I shift just before 8,000rpms I could be at 8520rpms!!!!
Is this dangerous!!??
So you're saying when I shift just before 8,000rpms I could be at 8520rpms!!!!
Is this dangerous!!??
-Ted
#20
yeah i know it makes max power at 7500rpm, but then the rpm's are just a little bit higher in the NEXT gear. But if i shift at max power (7500) then i could really be at 8000... HMMM... i think i'll just shift at 7000-7500 rpms from now on.
#21
Rotary Father
The difference in each successive gear at the same speed is just a little under 2K RPM. The reason you shift beyond the max power point is to keep the engine in the juicy part of the power band. If you shift at the MPP your engine will then have to climb just about 2K RPM to be making that much power again. However if you shift Oh, say 1K above your max point, you will only have to climb another 1K to make max power again. And as long as you have a decient powerband you are making more power just a little beyond the peak than you are a little before the peak. SO the important figure is actually the area under the curve while you drive. Shifting a little higher will give you a little more area under there than shifting right at the peak. And your ET will be lower. (unless your power curve DROPS very quickly after the peak)
#23
Rotary Father
Torque alone will not get you anywhere in a hurry. Power alone won't do it either. But you need a healthy mix of both to have perfect results. And results are usually expressed as times. If you shift at the torque peak you will be shifting much sooner and will therefore need to shift more times during the brief 1/4 mile drag. So, if you make a run shifting around the peak torque and then make another shifting around the peak power you will get better results on the "power" run, simply be virtue of having fewer shifts. Remember that you and SLOWING DOWN when you shift gears, thats why you want to do it as quickly as possible and as few times as possible.
#24
Originally posted by RETed
What you should be trying to do is hit the peak torque.  Peak torque is nowhere close to 7kRPM, so you're shifting ay too high.
-Ted
What you should be trying to do is hit the peak torque.  Peak torque is nowhere close to 7kRPM, so you're shifting ay too high.
-Ted
So you're saying I should shift around 4000 RPMs?
Any racing experts out there know where's best to shift?
#25
smog nazi destroyer
on my streetport , when racing, i usualy shift around 7500-8000rpm..
if you shift at 4k, then what is the point of having any power, because you are barely (if that) reaching your power band. when racing, you want to keep in your power band as much as possible. that generally means shifting after your peak power, so that you end up starting the next gear in the meaty part of your power band ( as junx said)
if you shift at 4k, then what is the point of having any power, because you are barely (if that) reaching your power band. when racing, you want to keep in your power band as much as possible. that generally means shifting after your peak power, so that you end up starting the next gear in the meaty part of your power band ( as junx said)