!!! New Godzilla Port !!!!
#26
dunno about the supercharger being better than turbo.. but sure... I think the altimate setup would be ... sequential port setup as well as a super charger for the low end power and a turbo for the high end power sure you would spenk like 30k on the whole thing but wow what a fast car that would make
#27
Lives on the Forum
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/10_year_icon.png)
Originally posted by geargrabber
i thought of doing up some titainium rotors. Im taking classes at a jc to learn how to operate/programm cnc mills and lathes.
i think the weight reduction of the rotors by using a lighter material would let the engine rev higher without the e-shaft flexing and the rotor tips hitting the side housings.
i thought of doing up some titainium rotors. Im taking classes at a jc to learn how to operate/programm cnc mills and lathes.
i think the weight reduction of the rotors by using a lighter material would let the engine rev higher without the e-shaft flexing and the rotor tips hitting the side housings.
You need to take some metalurgy classes and find out the characteristics of Ti.  Ti by itself is a very "abrasive" metal and galls other metals.  It has also different heat expansion characteristics, so I wanna know how you would solve the clearances problem.  You would think, if it was a good idea, someone else would've done it by now - there's a reason there is no Ti rotors being made.
Also, someone found out that going extremely light on the rotors does not offer better perfomance.  Ultra lightweight rotors are already being milled down to the 7 lbs. range.
I would think trying to program a 5-axis CNC to produce a Ti rotor is going to be mega expensive, even though you work at the place.  Raw Ti material is not cheap.  Having the bits break going through that much Ti is not cheap.
im also thinking a crank-driven centrifugal blower w/intercooler would be the best forced induction setup - the of best of both worlds (turbo vs supercharger).. no lag, real intercooling, boost control(im working on this one...), no exhaust restrictions
-Ted
#28
I rolled down a mountian
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/10_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: garden grove, california
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i thought of the different expansion of ti.. i could experiment with some plugs of both materials to make the rotors to dimension/side housing clearance when heated...
also titainium is not real hard to machine.. the trick is to keep a chip on it (not let the endmill cut air... always staying in the stock)
i think it would be a cool little project.. but i think your right-- the stock alone is going to be mega-expensive.
but im thinking if it lets me do 20000 rpm, why not?
also, why again doesn't super ultra lightwieght rotors offer better performance?? i thought it would.. maybe its like the lighter/heavier flywheel thingie...
a light flywheel makes for awesome road racing but sucks for getting out of the hole in drag racing... i dunno.
all i can imagine is the sound of a 20000 rpm rotary engine scaring the hell out of everyone. =)
also titainium is not real hard to machine.. the trick is to keep a chip on it (not let the endmill cut air... always staying in the stock)
i think it would be a cool little project.. but i think your right-- the stock alone is going to be mega-expensive.
but im thinking if it lets me do 20000 rpm, why not?
also, why again doesn't super ultra lightwieght rotors offer better performance?? i thought it would.. maybe its like the lighter/heavier flywheel thingie...
a light flywheel makes for awesome road racing but sucks for getting out of the hole in drag racing... i dunno.
all i can imagine is the sound of a 20000 rpm rotary engine scaring the hell out of everyone. =)
#29
Full Member
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/05_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Think your oilpump chain, the ring gear on the flywheel, input shaft to the gearbox etc is going to like big revs??? Nup! ![Smilie](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Originally posted by geargrabber
i thought of the different expansion of ti.. i could experiment with some plugs of both materials to make the rotors to dimension/side housing clearance when heated...
also titainium is not real hard to machine.. the trick is to keep a chip on it (not let the endmill cut air... always staying in the stock)
i think it would be a cool little project.. but i think your right-- the stock alone is going to be mega-expensive.
but im thinking if it lets me do 20000 rpm, why not?
also, why again doesn't super ultra lightwieght rotors offer better performance?? i thought it would.. maybe its like the lighter/heavier flywheel thingie...
a light flywheel makes for awesome road racing but sucks for getting out of the hole in drag racing... i dunno.
all i can imagine is the sound of a 20000 rpm rotary engine scaring the hell out of everyone. =)
i thought of the different expansion of ti.. i could experiment with some plugs of both materials to make the rotors to dimension/side housing clearance when heated...
also titainium is not real hard to machine.. the trick is to keep a chip on it (not let the endmill cut air... always staying in the stock)
i think it would be a cool little project.. but i think your right-- the stock alone is going to be mega-expensive.
but im thinking if it lets me do 20000 rpm, why not?
also, why again doesn't super ultra lightwieght rotors offer better performance?? i thought it would.. maybe its like the lighter/heavier flywheel thingie...
a light flywheel makes for awesome road racing but sucks for getting out of the hole in drag racing... i dunno.
all i can imagine is the sound of a 20000 rpm rotary engine scaring the hell out of everyone. =)
#30
Ga-nome liberator
![](/images/misc/20_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The reason lighter rotors don't offer better performance is because there is less rotational mass, so it is much harder to get it moving at lower rpms. And our cars already have limited torque and hp in the low end, so depleting that even more doesn't help it at all.
- Steiner
- Steiner
#31
Lives on the Forum
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/10_year_icon.png)
Originally posted by geargrabber
also, why again doesn't super ultra lightwieght rotors offer better performance?? i thought it would.. maybe its like the lighter/heavier flywheel thingie...
also, why again doesn't super ultra lightwieght rotors offer better performance?? i thought it would.. maybe its like the lighter/heavier flywheel thingie...
-Ted
#32
I rolled down a mountian
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/10_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: garden grove, california
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i guess i figure if combustion in the chambers would go to work turning the wheels instead of pushing around 9 lb rotors would offer better performance.
maybe we could have a special flywheel setup... a heavy mass around the flywheel for getting off the line, then once the car is rolling pretty good through 1st, it would dis-engage. Or maybe the mass would engage only at lower rpms/gear changes.
i cant visualize the rotor being its own counter-weight,
as far as balancing the rotors i have a design for a machine to do that... i think i could get the rotor to be very balanced using it.
the rotors need to be balanced front/rear (exactly weigh the same) and...
the rotor needs to be balanced as it spins on the e-shaft.
Balancing these two doesn't seem to be all that difficult.
So Ted, if i can do all i said, would it work?
maybe we could have a special flywheel setup... a heavy mass around the flywheel for getting off the line, then once the car is rolling pretty good through 1st, it would dis-engage. Or maybe the mass would engage only at lower rpms/gear changes.
i cant visualize the rotor being its own counter-weight,
as far as balancing the rotors i have a design for a machine to do that... i think i could get the rotor to be very balanced using it.
the rotors need to be balanced front/rear (exactly weigh the same) and...
the rotor needs to be balanced as it spins on the e-shaft.
Balancing these two doesn't seem to be all that difficult.
So Ted, if i can do all i said, would it work?
#33
Full Member
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/05_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Redondo Beach
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: !!! New Godzilla Port !!!!
Originally posted by von
Me and Jeff at Autoteck Motorsports just invented a new Port Size!!!
Me and Jeff at Autoteck Motorsports just invented a new Port Size!!!
Originally posted by von
I know somepeople have done it ...
I know somepeople have done it ...
![Confused](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![Confused](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![Confused](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![Confused](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![Confused](https://www.rx7club.com/images/smilies/confused.gif)
how exactley can you INVENT something thats ALREADY been done?
#35
Displacement > Boost
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/10_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know if it is mentioned in this thread, but this godzilla port experiment failed, in a big way. The engine ate a seal (probably a side seal got hung up on the large port that looked very rough to my eyes) and totally failed at making useful power. The old "port too big for the intake manifold" sickness. There were a few threads about this engine about a year ago.
#36
Senior Member
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/05_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: in your mother
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This started out as a good discussion topic...
I would have listened to the rest if it sounded credible.
Someone keeps throwing in some letter sequence. Maybe to establish himself as different, or to establish his own identity. Maybe it's like the 1!!1 thing.
I don't know, but not having stupid number/letter sequences in your posts would make whatever you said more believable.
I would have listened to the rest if it sounded credible.
Someone keeps throwing in some letter sequence. Maybe to establish himself as different, or to establish his own identity. Maybe it's like the 1!!1 thing.
I don't know, but not having stupid number/letter sequences in your posts would make whatever you said more believable.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post