2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

n/a vs. turbo II

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-03, 03:46 PM
  #26  
Full Member

 
skim003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Louisville,KY
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not really sure that NA is actually more reliable then the TII. I think only reason for less reliablity of TII is mainly due to fact that people will tend to drive TII more harder than a NA, and not keep up with normal maintance. I think a well maintained TII is just a reliable as NA. As far a modding a NA and TII it's all preference, if you are mainly concerned about speed go with TII, if you are mainly concerned about handling NA is just as good, if you want both then get a TII. It also depends if you want to mess with a turbo, any turbo car will be more complicated to work then a NA. TII have virtually no room to work with compared to NA(especially if your TII has ABS). It's much easier to work on my NA then my TII. But I like working on my TII because it offers much more challenge. Why not keep your NA as a daily driver and get a TII as a project car. My NA has few mods and I'm extremely happy with it but I not going to spend anymore money on it since potential for TII greatly out numbers that of NA.
Old 11-23-04, 10:01 PM
  #27  
Senior Member

 
86gxl_fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: dallas, TX 75228
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i thought a stock na produced around 146hp??
Old 11-24-04, 03:38 AM
  #28  
King of the Loop

 
BklynRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: brooklyn, New York
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Arrow

Originally Posted by Dan H
Then that T2 driver does not know how to drive. Besides, racing on a highway is not always an accurate test of power. Of course, I assume you already knew that.
This may not be absolutely true but from what ive personally seen n/a cars are usually better in manuevering, dipping, whatever you call it conditions while turbocharged cars are superior in the straight run. I have no idea why this si because i have never driven a turbo, but thats what ive seen.
Old 11-24-04, 05:11 AM
  #29  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by I EAT CIVICS
whatever you call it conditions while turbocharged cars are superior in the straight run. I have no idea why this si because i have never driven a turbo, but thats what ive seen.
You really need to drive one.
If you still think the turbo is just for "straight" driving, you really should learn how to drive.

Bottom line, NA's are easier to maintain and easier to drive.
IF YOU WANT MORE THAN 300HP AT THE WHEELS, the Turbo II is the only option.



-Ted
Old 11-24-04, 05:38 AM
  #30  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
DerangedHermit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN 37916
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
Bottom line, NA's are easier to maintain and easier to drive.
IF YOU WANT MORE THAN 300HP AT THE WHEELS, the Turbo II is the only option.
-Ted
Edit - If you want more than 300hp at the wheels in an engine that'll last more than 2,000 miles...
Old 11-24-04, 06:32 AM
  #31  
Full Member

 
White Rice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 86gxl_fc
i thought a stock na produced around 146hp??
i think he meant to the wheels and 146 is to the flywheel
Old 11-24-04, 01:25 PM
  #32  
rx3 wita panic button

 
73 mazda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: compton
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by afro thunder
I have an 87 GXL and I was wondering if it would be worth it to save up and get a turbo II with enough left to add on stuff, or if I could just mod. my N/A. I am still in school, so I would get a job over the summer and save up enough money for the turbo. Would it make sense to keep the N/A stock, and save up for the turbo, or just mod. the N/A? Oh, I want it ot be pretty fast, and still handle good.

Just because you want to go turbo does not mean you actually need a TII. I have a complete turbo engine without the turbo,intake,wiring,and exhaust. The motor is ready to go I can sell it to you and you can add all the extras. This is the best way to build it at your own pace or (whenever your paycheck comes). so this way you can have a turbo without paying for the whole car.
Old 11-24-04, 01:34 PM
  #33  
Lets rock.

 
flamin-roids's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok. How about mix and match existing RX7 parts so you can get them for cheap. TII transmission and a GTUs rear end with intake and exhaust would keep good pace with a S4 TII. Also you can thank that nice 3rd gear boost to the transmissions gearing. I have a TII trans in my N/A and the pull is very nice. But not boosted nice. Just nice.
Old 11-24-04, 09:28 PM
  #34  
Senior Member

 
86gxl_fc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: dallas, TX 75228
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is that 3rd gear boost, because of the turbo?? or because of the way the transmission transfers the power? i never did figure that out. because 4 banger, once i hit 3rd gear, i might as well pull over because it doesnt even feel like your movin. even tho my civic hits 130, it takes awhile.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hotshot2014
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
07-18-17 02:30 PM
immanuel__7
Canadian Forum
5
09-02-15 08:26 AM
rxmiles
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
08-24-15 02:07 PM
Professorpeanutrx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
08-15-15 01:38 PM



Quick Reply: n/a vs. turbo II



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18 AM.