is n/a fast
06-24-02, 03:26 PM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is n/a fast
i got a question. is a 1987 rx7 non-turbo decently fast.
like, i mean, can it take most 4 bangers???
i know that it is nothing compared to the TII, but compared to other cars, is it pretty fasst.
like i mean 240sx's, civics, etc. ??
thanks, ne info would be aweseom
like, i mean, can it take most 4 bangers???
i know that it is nothing compared to the TII, but compared to other cars, is it pretty fasst.
like i mean 240sx's, civics, etc. ??
thanks, ne info would be aweseom
06-24-02, 03:29 PM
#2
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: /dev/mustang
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, it can run a low 16 second timeslip if its perfectly tuned and you launch good. Most civics run 16.9's. Get you a 50 shot of nitrous and take out them v6 mustangs!
06-24-02, 03:35 PM
#6
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: not in winterpeg anymore
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by AbecX . Get you a 50 shot of nitrous and take out them v6 mustangs! [/B]
06-24-02, 03:38 PM
#7
Originally posted by AbecX
Yeah, it can run a low 16 second timeslip if its perfectly tuned and you launch good. Most civics run 16.9's. Get you a 50 shot of nitrous and take out them v6 mustangs!
Yeah, it can run a low 16 second timeslip if its perfectly tuned and you launch good. Most civics run 16.9's. Get you a 50 shot of nitrous and take out them v6 mustangs!
Actually a modded NA can hang (maybe beat, once every blue moon
) a stock 5.0L, the V6 aaare a joke, seriously!!
Trending Topics
06-24-02, 03:41 PM
#9
Re: is n/a fast
Originally posted by Antonio_bigbob
i got a question. is a 1987 rx7 non-turbo decently fast.
like, i mean, can it take most 4 bangers???
i know that it is nothing compared to the TII, but compared to other cars, is it pretty fasst.
like i mean 240sx's, civics, etc. ??
thanks, ne info would be aweseom
i got a question. is a 1987 rx7 non-turbo decently fast.
like, i mean, can it take most 4 bangers???
i know that it is nothing compared to the TII, but compared to other cars, is it pretty fasst.
like i mean 240sx's, civics, etc. ??
thanks, ne info would be aweseom
It is not like they are going to rape you in a drag race, but it might be VERY close
06-24-02, 03:47 PM
#10
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Vancouver / Brandon
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nissan 240's are slow... at least the newer ones.. my buddy has like a 1992 or a 1994 im not sure... And i work him good, its not even funny by how much... I dont even have lsd, and i have the automatic gears (switched it to standard)..and still he has no chance.. althought my streetport probably helps... lol
06-24-02, 03:59 PM
#11
...
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL... i bet i coulda taken a V6 stang when I was running on one rotor. 
Now i'm taking down the big boys (V8's) in my N/A
You're '87 N/A has 146 ponies and should easily take down most V6's and I4's.... Dont listen to AbecX, the only stangs beating you will say "GT" or "5.0" on the side...
Now i'm taking down the big boys (V8's) in my N/A
You're '87 N/A has 146 ponies and should easily take down most V6's and I4's.... Dont listen to AbecX, the only stangs beating you will say "GT" or "5.0" on the side...
06-24-02, 04:22 PM
#12
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: not in winterpeg anymore
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE]Originally posted by dre_2ooo
[B]LOL... i bet i coulda taken a V6 stang when I was running on one rotor.
dude if you think that is funny, read the other post where some dude told me a v6 mustang will kill an na rx7. single vs.dual exhaust thread
[B]LOL... i bet i coulda taken a V6 stang when I was running on one rotor.
dude if you think that is funny, read the other post where some dude told me a v6 mustang will kill an na rx7. single vs.dual exhaust thread
06-24-02, 04:47 PM
#13
.....shhh hes coming.....
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have nothin done to my 86 and i can beat most stock v6 mustangs and rs camaros. except the newer mustangs are pretty quick. only things ive tried and lost againt are mustang gts and a '90 300zx. i kno how to pick my battles 
06-24-02, 05:34 PM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Fast" is relative. If all you aspire to beat are cars than run 14 or slower, than you will be happy with an N/A. Otherwise, no.
To me N/As are slow. To the stock Z06s that destroy my T2, I'm sure my car is considered slow to them.
To me N/As are slow. To the stock Z06s that destroy my T2, I'm sure my car is considered slow to them.
06-24-02, 06:29 PM
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by dre_2ooo
nice red "x"
nice red "x"
Originally posted by dre_2ooo
Now i'm taking down the big boys (V8's) in my N/A
Now i'm taking down the big boys (V8's) in my N/A
06-24-02, 07:17 PM
#20
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: /dev/mustang
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was talking about the 99+ Mustangs V6's, the older ones had like 140hp
I'm not trying to flame any of you guys, but some of ya'lls claims about beating cars with twice as much hp and torque is just insane.
I'm not trying to flame any of you guys, but some of ya'lls claims about beating cars with twice as much hp and torque is just insane.
06-24-02, 07:55 PM
#21
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chatt., TN
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by AbecX
I was talking about the 99+ Mustangs V6's, the older ones had like 140hp
I'm not trying to flame any of you guys, but some of ya'lls claims about beating cars with twice as much hp and torque is just insane.
I was talking about the 99+ Mustangs V6's, the older ones had like 140hp
I'm not trying to flame any of you guys, but some of ya'lls claims about beating cars with twice as much hp and torque is just insane.
I think twice as much would be 320hp.
I dont think the 30 extra horses is gonna make up for the weight differance anyways, remember over there in the dualvs.single post when you were saying 20 hp was nothing.
Wtf are you thinking?
06-24-02, 10:12 PM
#24
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: not in winterpeg anymore
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by AbecX
I was talking about the 99+ Mustangs V6's, the older ones had like 140hp
I'm not trying to flame any of you guys, but some of ya'lls claims about beating cars with twice as much hp and torque is just insane.
I was talking about the 99+ Mustangs V6's, the older ones had like 140hp
I'm not trying to flame any of you guys, but some of ya'lls claims about beating cars with twice as much hp and torque is just insane.
again, this kid is stupid, he obviously knows very little or nothing about rx7's. Is it just me or is there a new trend starting for people that don't even own or have a clue about rx7's coming on this forum just to talk ****.
06-24-02, 10:57 PM
#25
Originally posted by fuzzi
Nissan 240's are slow... at least the newer ones.. my buddy has like a 1992 or a 1994 im not sure... And i work him good, its not even funny by how much... I dont even have lsd, and i have the automatic gears (switched it to standard)..and still he has no chance.. althought my streetport probably helps... lol
Nissan 240's are slow... at least the newer ones.. my buddy has like a 1992 or a 1994 im not sure... And i work him good, its not even funny by how much... I dont even have lsd, and i have the automatic gears (switched it to standard)..and still he has no chance.. althought my streetport probably helps... lol
BTW they only had vert 240sx's in 94 in the US. I think 89-93 for 180sx/s13 style, and 95-98 for S14 style.