2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

My take on the electric fan debate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-07, 07:53 PM
  #1  
Strength and Honor

Thread Starter
 
stevej88na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA bay area
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My take on the electric fan debate

I spent some time today estimating the CFM output of the stock S4 mechanical fan, and came up with some interesting results. Here are my findings:

S4 Fan CFM Estimation

And here's the conclusion, for those that don't want to wade through the article:

Assuming that Mazda engineered the fan to run at its peak efficiency, this estimation suggests that at idle, the RX-7 only needs 500 CFM at 0.02 in H2O to maintain proper cooling capacity. Thus, most after market electric fans are overkill, and take about 1/2 HP more than the stock fan to run at idle. Luckily, idle is exactly when HP loss doesn't matter, and interestingly, the Black Magic 150 appears more efficient than the stock fan at producing its CFM levels, even with the 70% efficiency handicap. In fact, the stock fan reaches the Black Magic 150's HP requirement at 2,400 engine RPM, but reaches its CFM level at 2,500 RPM. Also of note is the 150 has a peak efficiency at 0.5 inH2O, well above the stock fan's pressure at idle. Because of these two factors, applications that require higher pressures, such as racing radiators, or higher CFMs, such as drifting radiators, might be better served by an after market fan.

Just keep in mind this is a rough comparison, because the values here are estimates, and because the exact fan speed (the "operating point") depends on knowing how pressure varies with CFM across the radiator and shroud.
So, it isn't necessarily true that after market fans won't reach the CFM level of the stock fan. It's quite the opposite: after market fans tend to be overkill at idle.
Old 02-10-07, 08:10 PM
  #2  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by stevej88na
I spent some time today estimating the CFM output of the stock S4 mechanical fan, and came up with some interesting results. Here are my findings:

S4 Fan CFM Estimation

And here's the conclusion, for those that don't want to wade through the article:



So, it isn't necessarily true that after market fans won't reach the CFM level of the stock fan. It's quite the opposite: after market fans tend to be overkill at idle.
Reading your article, it fails to take into consideration that the stock fan freewheels at highway speeds and cooler air temps, so a static test won't represent either the aftermarket fan (which if it does not freewheel will actually change the Cd on the car) and the disconnected freewheeling fan.

But your article is a good start.
Old 02-10-07, 08:35 PM
  #3  
Strength and Honor

Thread Starter
 
stevej88na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA bay area
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good point about the freewheeling at high speeds. I can see how the Black Magic might pose a fair amount more resistance to airflow than the stock fan since the 150's fan and shroud are right against the radiator.

With this article, I wanted to compare the two fans at high temperatures and low forward speed - a classically bad scenario for cooling - to see if the Black Magic was actually worse at cooling than the stock fan when both fans are at maximum output. It turns out it's not worse, but better, at a cost of 1/2HP.

Thanks for the heads-up, I suppose I need to specify that in the introduction!
Old 02-10-07, 10:15 PM
  #4  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
There are also PWM controllers that do not run at 100% all the time.
Spal makes the FAN-PWM which has a 50% PWM setting.
Also, I think Black Magic just came out with a variable PWM controller...
This gets around the ON / OFF binary operation for most electric fans.


-Ted
Old 02-10-07, 10:16 PM
  #5  
Clean.

iTrader: (1)
 
ericgrau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,521
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Strange, I got that same black magic electric fan before. It pulled noticeably less air than the stock fan. I popped the hood and felt it. Maybe I'm mistaken and I was feeling the stock fan during warmup, but I don't think so.
Old 02-10-07, 11:59 PM
  #6  
Strength and Honor

Thread Starter
 
stevej88na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA bay area
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
There are also PWM controllers that do not run at 100% all the time.
Spal makes the FAN-PWM which has a 50% PWM setting.
Also, I think Black Magic just came out with a variable PWM controller...
This gets around the ON / OFF binary operation for most electric fans.
Maybe that'll be my next project after I finish the MAF swap (patience my5ababy!), I already have all the components I'd need. That's one thing most current electric fans lack.

Originally Posted by ericgrau
Strange, I got that same black magic electric fan before. It pulled noticeably less air than the stock fan. I popped the hood and felt it. Maybe I'm mistaken and I was feeling the stock fan during warmup, but I don't think so.
Interesting, I unfortunately don't remember how my old fan felt (I swapped in an electric fan before I knew any better - seven years ago), but the stock fan can potentially pull more air at speeds above idle. If this is any reference, I can feel a good breeze when I'm near my rear license plate and the fan's on, and the fan itself is louder than my Toyota Corolla.
Old 02-11-07, 10:11 AM
  #7  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 110 Likes on 93 Posts
People keep examining the e-fan "debate" from the wrong angle. Seriously, who cares how much any fan flows as long as it is enough?

The real debate (if you can even call it that) is centered around claims regarding gains in performance. That's easy enough to disprove and really people will keep thinking what they want, even if it is wrong.

The real problem with e-fans is not the fan itself, but the crappy installation that 99% of people seem to end up with. Any advantage the e-fan may have is totally negated by the fact that it might burn the car down at any time...
Old 02-11-07, 10:35 AM
  #8  
Full Member

 
txfatboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wylie, Texas
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have run e-fans on every performance car I have built and each time was for different reasons. The main reason I swaped my T2 to an e-fan was to make working on the car easier. It seemed that when ever I needed to work on my car I was having to remove the fan shroud to gain access or just make the job easier. I had to swap out the front crank seal late last year and it took less than 10 min.
Yes I am a profesional tech and I do have the proper tools but not having to spend an hour removing that shroud made the job much easier.

I have had the e-fan for a while and even in our hotter-than-hell summers in Texas with the ac on (and stock replacement radiator) I never have any overheating problems.
Old 02-11-07, 10:38 AM
  #9  
MODERATOR


iTrader: (137)
 
Alex Rodriguez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 6,441
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
.

The real problem with e-fans is not the fan itself, but the crappy installation that 99% of people seem to end up with. Any advantage the e-fan may have is totally negated by the fact that it might burn the car down at any time...
+1
Old 02-11-07, 01:04 PM
  #10  
Strength and Honor

Thread Starter
 
stevej88na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA bay area
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wanted to research the widespread belief that "no electric fan will ever cool as well as the stock one" (you know you've heard that). That's the debate I was concerned with, and I think I've provided some solid estimates of the stock fan's CFM, which I've never seen before, which suggest that in fact an electric fan can cool as well, if not better, than the stock fan - at least at low speeds. Though many have known an electric fan can cool just fine, there are many who didn't, because some of the threads and other info spreading around tend to say electric fans are never a good idea.

As for hooking one up properly, RotaMan posted his method here: http://howto.globalvicinity.com/gv_w...=148&co=1&vi=1

As always, to provide the community with the best info possible, if you have improvements or suggestions, please update it.
Old 02-11-07, 01:17 PM
  #11  
Strength and Honor

Thread Starter
 
stevej88na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA bay area
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's something else interesting: if the shroud clearance goes from 0.75" to 0.76", the CFM drops by 6% at the same pressure. So, tip clearance is extremely sensitive, and shows yet again that having a shroud is very important.
Old 02-11-07, 11:42 PM
  #12  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by txfatboy
The main reason I swaped my T2 to an e-fan was to make working on the car easier. It seemed that when ever I needed to work on my car I was having to remove the fan shroud to gain access or just make the job easier...

Yes I am a profesional tech and I do have the proper tools but not having to spend an hour removing that shroud made the job much easier.
An amateur with basic hand tools should have the shroud off in less than 10 minutes. Either you're not a very good tech, or more likely this is just another case of the exaggeration and myth that always seems to be used to justify e-fan swaps.

Originally Posted by stevej88na
I wanted to research the widespread belief that "no electric fan will ever cool as well as the stock one" (you know you've heard that).
And this is completely true, because with a healthy thermoclutch the stock fan controls engine temp perfectly. How can any e-fan installation, no matter how powerful the fan is, do any better than that? That's not a rhetorical question either; I'd really like someone to answer it.

Though many have known an electric fan can cool just fine, there are many who didn't, because some of the threads and other info spreading around tend to say electric fans are never a good idea.
In all the e-fan debates I don't think I've ever heard anyone knowledgeable make the blanket statement that "electric fans are never a good idea". I'm sure it's been said many times that crappy electric fans are never a good idea, poorly installed/wired electric fans are never a good idea, electric fans installed by people who don't know what they're doing are never a good idea, etc, etc.
Old 02-12-07, 01:27 AM
  #13  
Goofyrotor

 
jonesfromindia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by stevej88na
Here's something else interesting: if the shroud clearance goes from 0.75" to 0.76", the CFM drops by 6% at the same pressure. So, tip clearance is extremely sensitive, and shows yet again that having a shroud is very important.

ive been driving without a shroud on for about a month, got a new koyo alum rad, they didnt send me the shroud mounting kit for another 2 weeks, and i didnt have time to put it back on till today....

i live in LA, so yes...i sit in traffic, and i drove down to san diego and back up twice.

honestly, according to my stock temp gauge, the temp dropped(on the gauge) was not really worth putting it back on. but there was a difference.

but thats my personal experience.

oh and i want to do the e-fan conversion, i hate hearing the fan over the motor at slower speeds and lower rpms. and i think e fans look better to me. those yellow propellor blades on the fan dont look fantastic either.

another thing.

i totally agree with aaroncake. if it gets the job done, why not? the fact my car could catch on fire at any given momment makes me feel like james bond!
Old 02-12-07, 01:34 AM
  #14  
Back in the game

iTrader: (-1)
 
TehMonkay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I would like to have an efan and electrix water pump setup and an electric oil pump to use on the turbo. No need for a turbo timer, just get these three things to run for a few minutes after shutting off the car. Plus if you overheat or want to cool off at auto-x without wasting fuel you wouldnt have to, just an idea though
Old 02-12-07, 03:38 AM
  #15  
Strength and Honor

Thread Starter
 
stevej88na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA bay area
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
And this is completely true, because with a healthy thermoclutch the stock fan controls engine temp perfectly.
True, but I didn't mean it to be taken that way; if I can revise my statement, I'm sure you'll see it's in the spirit of my article:

Originally Posted by revised stevej88na quote
I wanted to research the widespread belief that "no electric fan will ever have the cooling capacity of the stock one" (you know you've heard that).
I should make it clear here, as in the article, that the stock fan can pull more air than reasonable electric fans. The difference is, the stock fan can only pull more air at high engine speeds, and not at idle. One situation this might come into play is driving up a steep hill on a hot day (low driving speed, high engine speed). In that situation, an electric fan might not provide enough cooling capacity. The stock fan can reach 2,600 CFM at 4,000 engine RPM, while the Black Magic 150 is limited to 1,700 CFM.

Originally Posted by NZConvertible
In all the e-fan debates I don't think I've ever heard anyone knowledgeable make the blanket statement that "electric fans are never a good idea". I'm sure it's been said many times that crappy electric fans are never a good idea, poorly installed/wired electric fans are never a good idea, electric fans installed by people who don't know what they're doing are never a good idea, etc, etc.
The trouble is, readers tend to take different things away from those debates, and I've noticed a trend towards thinking electric fans cannot provide the airflow that the stock fan can. Annoyed that no one actually knows how many CFMs our stock fans pull, and in my continued quest for data mongering, I wanted to provide us with some estimates. I found the results somewhat surprising, because when I started out, I expected the data to tell me it was time to put my clutch fan back on.

Another interesting and unexpected finding was the stock fan's shroud. Since it has such a large clearance, its efficiency is quite low. That large clearance alone makes up for the efficiency handicap forced on electric fans. For instance, if the shroud gap were reduced to 0.2" (the gap on my electric fan), it would pull 50% more CFM at idle. So, reasonable electric fans can potentially be more efficient than the stock fan.

With this information, it seems to me that an electric fan fitted with a PWM controller that can follow the stock fan's CFM vs. temperature profile might be a good alternative to the stock setup. You might say, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" - but I happen to already have an electric fan, so a PWM controller is in my future.

As an aside, HAILERS suggested designing a low-cost digital rotary compression tester a while back (as I've done with some other projects listed here), so I'll be doing that or a PWM controller as my next project.

Originally Posted by jonesfromindia
i hate hearing the fan over the motor at slower speeds and lower rpms
My electric fan is still pretty loud...

Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
Seriously, who cares how much any fan flows as long as it is enough?
Though we can install an electric fan and see that it doesn't overheat, I wanted to find out what Mazda thought "enough" was. Now we have some estimates to base things off of, can rest assured that the electric fan can handle most situations, but are aware that sometimes electric fans may not be enough. I guess I have to watch the ol' temperature gauge next time I drive up the grape vine!
Old 02-12-07, 03:39 AM
  #16  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by jonesfromindia
ive been driving without a shroud on for about a month...

i hate hearing the fan over the motor at slower speeds and lower rpms.
Removing the shroud dramatically lowers the fan's efficiency, meaning it has to run far more often than with in the shroud place, which will obviously make more noise (as well as probably using more gas). So you're creating your own problem.

And in you think an e-fan conversion will eliminate fan noise, you can't have heard many e-fans running.

those yellow propellor blades on the fan dont look fantastic either.
Your fan is yellow? It should be white.

Originally Posted by TehMonkay
I would like to have an efan and electrix water pump setup and an electric oil pump to use on the turbo. No need for a turbo timer, just get these three things to run for a few minutes after shutting off the car.
The turbo is water-cooled; you don't need a turbo timer unless you're dumb enough to abuse the car right before shutting it off. Besides, a turbo timer would cost about a tenth of what those three items combined would cost.
Old 02-12-07, 10:40 AM
  #17  
1/1 scale Hot Wheels

iTrader: (1)
 
ourxseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I've strongly considered the efan mod recently , but responses from those with over 10,000 posts (and none in the lounge ) gets my attention

i'm sticking with the stock fan and shroud ( it is a nice tool holder)
Old 02-12-07, 10:55 AM
  #18  
Full Member
 
matthewromeril's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: jersey uk channel islands
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I bought an electric fan kit fitted it to the rad it worked great.
After a few small events it was time for the main rally.
What i didn't know was that under heavy breaking and with the fan not bing verticle it slowly broke down the mounting pads.
After 4 stages the fan started chewing into the rad. First i new about it was the coolent warning and the buzzer comming on by the end of the stage it was too late i needed a rebuild.
A very expensive mistake and to be out after 4 stages gutting.
be very carefull i'm a good amature my car is very well put together and i f!!cked it up.
Old 02-12-07, 11:00 AM
  #19  
Rotaries confuse me

iTrader: (7)
 
My5ABaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
Your fan is yellow? It should be white.
Mine's a dirty white (kinda yellowish from dirt). But if I clean it the blades should be white.
Old 02-12-07, 11:03 AM
  #20  
1/1 scale Hot Wheels

iTrader: (1)
 
ourxseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by My5ABaby
Mine's a dirty white (kinda yellowish from dirt). But if I clean it the blades should be white.

i'm going to paint an " E " on my blades just to win both sides of the debate
Old 02-12-07, 12:53 PM
  #21  
Goofyrotor

 
jonesfromindia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Your fan is yellow? It should be white.




its like maybe a neon greenish yellow. positively not white. its not even dirty.

the rx7 gods must have cursed me white ugly blades.

and my civic e fan, i had two, were no were even close to hearing in the car.
Old 02-12-07, 01:33 PM
  #22  
Strength and Honor

Thread Starter
 
stevej88na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA bay area
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ourxseven
i'm going to paint an " E " on my blades just to win both sides of the debate
Ha! You can tell people that your "e-fan" cools just as well, if not better, than the stock fan in every way. People will PM you incessantly to find out which fan you have. (humor)

^ bonus points to whoever knows where I got that unique parenthetical technique
Old 02-12-07, 04:16 PM
  #23  
Rotaries confuse me

iTrader: (7)
 
My5ABaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by stevej88na
Ha! You can tell people that your "e-fan" cools just as well, if not better, than the stock fan in every way. People will PM you incessantly to find out which fan you have. (humor)

^ bonus points to whoever knows where I got that unique parenthetical technique
Hailers. Do I win?
Old 02-12-07, 06:03 PM
  #24  
Strength and Honor

Thread Starter
 
stevej88na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA bay area
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup, you win. I usually find the fact that he's pointing out when something's funny funnier than the joke he's pointing out. But I digress!

Unless my friend from New Zealand has more to say, all I have left to add is this:



I added another data point to the HP graph, and added another that's CFM vs. engine RPM. That's CFM when the stock fan is fully engaged (80%, above 85C).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eplusz
General Rotary Tech Support
15
10-07-15 04:04 PM



Quick Reply: My take on the electric fan debate



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 AM.