2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

My rebuild "blog"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-05, 10:01 AM
  #26  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by johnnyg
Which??? This is exactly what I need to know!
The first pic with the close-up of the "chewed up" apex seal groove would be most likely no good.

The second pic with the "dent" in the rotor face is okay to use in my book.
Damage to the rotor face don't really affect anything.
This is an non-turbo, right?
For non-turbos, combustion temps and pressures are not as high as turbo motors, and even ugly dents like that are not a big deal.


I thought of that, but as luck would have it, one of the corner seal openings got pinched too. Milling wouldn't correct that.
Ouch!
Yep, you're totally right on that point.


Do you have a source you could recommend? I've posted messages here, but so far, have come up dry.
Wow, that's odd.
A few months ago, non-turbo rotors were being offered for sale almost every day!
I guess we're in a dry spell.
Check the For Sale section for 2nd gen parts, right?



Definitely got all the triangle assist pieces, but didn't actually count up the springs.
Okay, and the apex seals are all intact and no chipped ends, right?
Just looking at the dimensions of the dent, it can only be a piece from the apex seal or an apex seal spring.


-Ted
Old 07-19-05, 10:06 AM
  #27  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by johnnyg
The question is, how much is too much? To get them perfectly flat again, I'd need to shave off 4 thous from 4 sides, for a total of 16 thous. Do you need to go perfectly flat? Can I only take off 2 thous?
This will depend on what the alpha code on your front spacer???
Can you check this out?
The spacers from Mazda are like 0.02mm difference.
If I do the math right, that's a LOT less than 0.002".

Scroll down to "end spacer chart"...
http://www.mazdatrix.com/b5.htm


-Ted
Old 07-19-05, 10:22 AM
  #28  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
johnnyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
The first pic with the close-up of the "chewed up" apex seal groove would be most likely no good.

The second pic with the "dent" in the rotor face is okay to use in my book.
Actually, that's all on the same rotor face...the 2nd picture is just a bit lower then the first. Don't know why I bothered with 2 pics, really.
This is an non-turbo, right?
Correct.
Ouch!
Yep, you're totally right on that point.
A few months ago, non-turbo rotors were being offered for sale almost every day!
Lucky me!
Check the For Sale section for 2nd gen parts, right?
I have a post in the Canadian section - easier to try there first.

Okay, and the apex seals are all intact and no chipped ends, right?
I'll have to look 'em over again. Everything appeared intact when I removed the housing, but the first apex seal I tried to pull out snapped in half and shot across the room. I believe it was just because that was the first time I had ever touched one and I torque it the wrong way (plus it has 200,000KM on it!)

Just looking at the dimensions of the dent, it can only be a piece from the apex seal or an apex seal spring.
Certainly looks like that to me, too. I'm just not sure where the heck it came from. There aren't too many possibiilties though!
Old 07-19-05, 10:28 AM
  #29  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
johnnyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
The spacers from Mazda are like 0.02mm difference.
If I do the math right, that's a LOT less than 0.002".
But if I take .002" off each face, that's .008" total, equal to .02mm

Is it okay to do this and leave a nearly .002" groove? Or should I just use them as is, since they meet the minimum spec?? What would YOU do in my shoes?
Old 07-19-05, 08:58 PM
  #30  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
johnnyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's the best way to get the exhaust manifold studs out of the housings? Using back-to-back nuts, I had little problem removing the top studs on each housing, but the bottom ones will barely move and I don't want to put too much pressure on them. I tried heat, but that seemed to make it worse!
Old 07-20-05, 12:10 AM
  #31  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by johnnyg
But if I take .002" off each face, that's .008" total, equal to .02mm
Man, my math must be screwed. :P
I tried to punch it in, and I got 0.02mm x 25.4 = ~0.0007"?
It looks like I was off by one zero!


Is it okay to do this and leave a nearly .002" groove? Or should I just use them as is, since they meet the minimum spec?? What would YOU do in my shoes?
It depends on the iron...
If the groove isn't that bad (catch a fingernail?), I wouldn't bother lapping.
Lapping causes more headaches that it helps...


-Ted
Old 07-20-05, 12:19 AM
  #32  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by johnnyg
What's the best way to get the exhaust manifold studs out of the housings? Using back-to-back nuts, I had little problem removing the top studs on each housing, but the bottom ones will barely move and I don't want to put too much pressure on them. I tried heat, but that seemed to make it worse!
I dunno what is best, but the double nut method works.

Yeah, some of them get pretty tight in there.

I would try and use some penetrant - i.e. WD-40, Liquid Wrench, PB Blaster, etc. - that might help.

The studs are pretty damn strong, and I'd be surprised if you actually managed to kill one.


-Ted
Old 07-20-05, 02:48 AM
  #33  
Full Member

 
couturemarc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog/item....re&dir=catalog


best way to get a stud out, you can find cheaper ones but the Mac and Snap On ones are the best i've used yet, for the rotor housings i think you only need the #10 and #6 but im not sure.
Old 07-20-05, 03:44 AM
  #34  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
I've used the Snap-On, and it's probably the most effective out of everything out there, but it's not perfect.
The really fine teeth still damages the threads on the studs, albiet not as bad as some of the cheaper units, but it still does some damage.
The double nut method almost always works when done right, and it does little damage.


-Ted
Old 07-20-05, 08:45 AM
  #35  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
johnnyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
Man, my math must be screwed. :P
I tried to punch it in, and I got 0.02mm x 25.4 = ~0.0007"?
It looks like I was off by one zero!
Umm...so was I! .008" = .2mm

If the groove isn't that bad (catch a fingernail?), I wouldn't bother lapping.
Lapping causes more headaches that it helps...
I can certainly feel it with a fingernail, but I wouldn't say it catches.

As for the exhaust studs, I was more worried about stripping the threads in the housing then breaking the stud. Since I haven't read any cautions in this regard, I assume that shouldn't be much a concern.
Old 07-20-05, 09:42 AM
  #36  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by johnnyg
I can certainly feel it with a fingernail, but I wouldn't say it catches.
If the "chrome" surfaces are intact (can you take a pic of this area?), I wouldn't bother lapping them.
What are you building the motor for?
To last another 200k miles?


As for the exhaust studs, I was more worried about stripping the threads in the housing then breaking the stud. Since I haven't read any cautions in this regard, I assume that shouldn't be much a concern.
Um, any reason why you're trying to remove them?
Are you trying to save the housing or the studs?
I'm a bit confused.


-Ted
Old 07-20-05, 09:53 AM
  #37  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
johnnyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will post a pic tonight. The housings are very clean and I'm probably just over-reacting. These are the first I've ever seen in person, afterall. Definitely not expecting another 200K, but wouldn't that be a kick?!

I'm sending the housings to JHB and they said it would be nice if I removed the studs, but they're happy to do it too, so all's well. I could probably re-use the housings too, but they are definitely on the other side of the 'spec' line and I'm just more comfortable re-surfacing them. The chrome flaking isn't very deep into the housing, but althogether, nearly 1/2 way around the perimeter is flaking.
Old 07-20-05, 10:41 PM
  #38  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
johnnyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, talk about a change of plans! I was all ready to spend $800 on JHB resufacing, nearly $1500 on parts from Mazda, at least $100 for a new rotor, and hundred more on other odds and end.

Then, just before 5pm today, an ad shows up in the Canadian Buy/Sell section here...an S5 Mazda reman longblock with 90,000KM on it and in perfect working condition for...$500! How could I resist?!

I still might rebuild that, but if it's making good compression, what's the point? I guess I'll make that determination once I get the engine (next week sometime).
Old 07-21-05, 06:50 AM
  #39  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Geezuschrist...a $3,000 NA motor???
You ARE crazy!


-Ted
Old 07-21-05, 08:31 AM
  #40  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
johnnyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But don't forget....that's Canadian $$
Old 07-21-05, 09:20 AM
  #41  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Even at CDN$ it's still a lot!


-Ted
Old 07-21-05, 09:32 AM
  #42  
Senior Member

 
buttsjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Well. I like this thread, so I think you should go ahead and rebuild your motor, and continue the discussion (maybe I'm being selfish).
Old 07-21-05, 10:02 AM
  #43  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
johnnyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No problem...just let me start a PayPal account for donations

I will still post pics of my existing internals. I was cleaning parts last night and never got around to that. I have a feeling most people would consider them all reusable.

Also, I'm still thinking about tearing apart the new motor, too. If everything's in spec, I'll only be out $250 for a gasket set. But I'm still fighting that "why mess with what works?" thing!
Old 07-21-05, 10:55 AM
  #44  
Yar-Har-Har

 
Fitness Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Nashville, 37217
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by johnnyg
But I'm still fighting that "why mess with what works?" thing!

cause you might start it up and 4 weeks later .. pop ...

but you may install it and never have another problem ... ... its a gamble unless you know for sure how the shape of the internals are
Old 07-21-05, 12:21 PM
  #45  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
johnnyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True, but the smallest assembly error and I might cause a "pop" where one would not have happened otherwise. Oh what to do...what to do!! It's nice to have options, at least.
Old 07-21-05, 09:45 PM
  #46  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
johnnyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here are a few pics of my parts. I'd love to hear opinions on how usable they look.



Old 07-21-05, 09:50 PM
  #47  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
johnnyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regarding the new engine I'm buying, the current owner tells me that he dyno'd at 137HP at the wheels just a month ago, and the engine runs extremely well. The only reason he's selling it is because he's swapping for a TII drivetrain. So, there's really no reason to tear it down, which is just fine with me. Now I can spend money on some other upgrades and maybe a new carpet.
Old 07-24-05, 09:51 PM
  #48  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
johnnyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No opinions on these pics?? Do the parts look re-usable?
Old 07-24-05, 09:57 PM
  #49  
Never give up!

iTrader: (8)
 
The Spyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,727
Received 66 Likes on 41 Posts
I would not use either of those peices. The iron can be laped, but that housing looks like trash.
Old 07-24-05, 10:13 PM
  #50  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Berthier, Quebec
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rotor housings dont seem to be really good, but try to take pictures with a better lighting, cause if they are reallu rippled like that, that looks to be junk...

those irons seems ok... the water jackets seem to be really strong, no corrosion or ****

but I do admit that even if I dissasembled couple of engines, I never actually rebuilt one, so I'm not any kind of trustable guru....


Quick Reply: My rebuild "blog"



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 AM.