RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) (https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/)
-   -   my n/a supercharging project complete (https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/my-n-supercharging-project-complete-289791/)

MPM 04-08-04 07:24 AM


Originally posted by RETed
Okay, and this is my beef with this thread...

Just because the original poster made everything for $300 doesn't mean you can too.

REPEAT.

You are talking about an eBay purchase.  I won't even go into a possible bad transaction that involves faulty or bad merchandise - if you haven't been through one, it's one of the most frustratings things in life.  This means prices will vary; unless someone can show me a site where you can buy these used SC's for a set guaranteed price, the initial purchase of the SC is variable.

The SC and pulley bracket system has to be made out of very strong or very thick materials.  Precision has to be done down to under 1/8" (for the pulley), or else it's going to eat belts like a mofo.  I would estimate a typical machine shop would charge anywhere from $100 to $300 for this work.  Unless you got the resources and can weld like the original poster (which I think most of you cannot do), you not going to get a "free" bracketing system.

Although the poster did not run into any problems with the stock fuel system, upgrading is is highly recommended.  The stock fuel injectors can barely support 200hp at the wheels; I think you will be getting very close to this power level.  The stock NA fuel pump can support slightly more (maybe up to 250hp), but it's always safer to upgrade to a Walbro which will give you way-more-than-enough capacity from the fuel pump...at about $100, it's no excuse.  This means upgrade fuel injectors and the upgrade fuel pump costs need to be factored in.  FC turbo fuel injectors are pretty cheap and easily available, and I've seen prices anywhere from $50 to $150 for a set of 4.

A boost-dependent FPR would be a good thing, and the easy path would be to to swap for a stock FC turbo FPR (or entire fuel rail).  Retrofit BDFPR's are still over $100+ for a brand new one.

Now, as for the SC sizing...  Running something off a 3.0 liter 6-cylinder piston motor is just about perfect.  When we size turbos, we use the equivalent 2.5 liter to 3.0 liter piston engine displacement figures for application to the 13B.  Good job!

NZConvertible is right about the exhaust.  Running a stock NA exhaust will choke performance.  Although not required, it is highly recommended to run a freer-flowing exhaust system.  You might be able to get away with the stock exhaust manifold, but a mid-pipe, high-flow cat / test pipe, and aftermarket cat-back should be installed.  This is even more money to throw at this project.

A fuel computer is highly recommended to fine tune the fuel delivery.  Even used units are over $100, but many are already running them on their NA's.  If you don't have one, you should budget for one.  Ignition timing you can fudge with moving the CAS; if you need to retard it a little, just dial te CAS back a few degrees.  A retard box, brand new, is serious money.

Do you think your stock NA clutch can handle the increased torque?  I highly doubt it.  A new or upgrade clutch may be able to hold, but if you're running a stock OEM clutch that has a lot of miles on it, you're going to be buying a new clutch, guaranteed.  That's another couple hundred for the clutch!

I can go into a whole bunch of other things that can give you trouble, but this is going to end up being an epic, so I'll stop here. :)

In the end, I tally the final cost to be MINIMUM about $1,000 for a "typical" install.

If you have a highly modified NA with upgrade clutch + AFC, it's still about $700 minimum.

If you're starting with a car that's bone stock and high mileage, we're talking prices approaching closer to $2,000!

Bottom line, there's a LOT of auxuliary things you need to budget for and getting a "$300" SC off of eBay is just the start of your upgrades.  Don't look foolish and thing you can get your car running reliably with just a $300 SC...


-Ted

Wow Ted. Thanks for adding such negative vibes to such a positive thread. Always got to bring the little man down? I don't think so. Its seems if we don't do it your way we're doing it wrong.

banzaitoyota 04-08-04 07:35 AM

I think TED (Who I dont always agree with) is interjecting a BADLY NEEDED dose of reality to this thread.

patman 04-08-04 08:28 AM

I think all you people arguing on here should quit. This is a good thread about a great idea. leave it at that. I posted a long time ago, saying that this is really only good if you are a do-it-yourself kinda person who can figure it all out and make everything work without buying a bunch of shit. And basically, thats what it comes down to. If youre zbrown, or someone else with the skills to do this, then its a great mod, with a very good bang-for-the-buck value. however, if youre not so good, and youre going out on a limb to do it, then its not a real great idea. which is basically what Ted is saying. If you really know what youre doing, then what do you care what he (or anyone else) says...you just do it. But if youre kinda fuzzy, maybe you should listen to him, cause if you hafta ask, then he's right, this will cost you more than its worth.

pat

DCRotor 04-08-04 08:50 AM

the other persome did not post it so im trying to post.

fong 04-08-04 09:06 AM

I will take Ted's comments as a wake up call: think more before start the project. it is good to see things in different angles.

at first, I was so excited about the idea, and it is so attempting to be the second one to do it. well, what I learn from Ted is that we should face the reality. $300 is just a start. if we want our toys run better, we need more funding. and it could end up the same cost for a turbo swap.....

it is really up to us to think about what to do.

but my comment about this work: GREAT idea, way to go.

DEZERTE 04-08-04 09:29 AM


Originally posted by MPM
Wow Ted. Thanks for adding such negative vibes to such a positive thread. Always got to bring the little man down? I don't think so. Its seems if we don't do it your way we're doing it wrong.
Although it was somewhat more "negative" than positive, i dont think he was trying to bring anybody down. He's pretty smart and was just giving his 2c's

greenchili 04-08-04 10:51 AM

that BOV sounds GREAT!

the clip was really neat!

zbrown, you're doing an AWESOME job....KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK MY MAN!

:rock: :rock: :rock:

Chimeron 04-08-04 11:06 AM

Ted is right that people who don't know what's going on shouldn't do this. I'd like to do this but I DEFINITELY need to understand more to do it. That's pretty much the whole point of this thread. So that people can learn. That's also WHY I'm asking questions. Once I understand it all (hah, right) I'll do it.

banzaitoyota 04-08-04 11:50 AM

Here it is in another light: I have a well equipped shop w/paint equipment. I can put a nice paintjob on my car for 400-600$$$. Does that mean someone wiht a basic wrench set can duplicate my results for the same amount of $$, NO F'ing way!!!!

Be realistic in your assesments of your capabilities, skills and access to specialized tools when starting on a project.

MPM 04-08-04 12:36 PM


Originally posted by DEZERTE
Although it was somewhat more "negative" than positive, i dont think he was trying to bring anybody down. He's pretty smart and was just giving his 2c's
Any time your negative about what someone has done and inject your own opinions you bring someone down. Yes, what ted said needed to be said as some of it will hold true but the delivery needs worked on.

Hats off to zbrown for getting it working. Now continue improving upon it and keep us posted.

Visago 04-08-04 02:21 PM

hey Z, would it possible to get a launch or a 1/4 mile vid, that would be awesome to see it tearing down the strip:rock:

Aaron Cake 04-08-04 03:40 PM

OK. I'm going to delete all irrevelant replies from this thread, then move it to the archive as soon as it looks like it's over. Please save me the work and don't pollute this thread. This means no discussions about nitrous, who's right and who's wrong, arguments, etc. Thanks.

monkey 04-08-04 05:46 PM

Zbrown, i have a question. At about 6 seconds into the video clip it sounds like the engine bogs a for a second.(other than that it sounds great!) I was wondering if your axillary ports are wired open and if you've done the "throttlebody mod" or any other thing that may cause this bog at low rpms. I think you did a great job and im gunna try and pull this off considering i have access to all the parts/tools/sc. Thanks for any info

skydivr73 04-08-04 06:13 PM

so basically, what we have here is a way that somewhere in the ballpark of a thousand bucks and some work can get an NA owner into the power range of a TII....I fail to see how this is a bad thing. I look at the kits out these days as a joke. Even the new Atkins kit--over $3K I think it was, and for something like FIFTY HP...what a waste. Not to mention--there is no way that you can do a TII conversion for that price.

I would like to see a larger diameter intake size though...I am wondering how much that small setup takes away from the potential. And I am interested in knowing what other mods are recommended for this--like what kind of clutch and exhaust for example. The clutch in particular, since I need to replace mine soon anyway and would just go for the upgrade one now. What is a good streetable clutch for this kind of power? Keep in mind that the car will be a daily driver.

oh, and good job Z for getting this figured out this much. Keep working on it and let us know what you find. Also--have you considered doing anything like a kit to help others that want to use the same sc? Basically I am referring to the welded parts that many of us do not have a way to make. You could put together a set of mounting brackets, pulley and idler pulley, and maybe the adapter piece to hook up to intake piping. You would sell them pretty well if the quality and price were good. I dont know how comfortable you are with your welding skills, but it does look pretty solid in the pics.

NZConvertible 04-08-04 06:56 PM


Originally posted by MPM
Any time your negative about what someone has done and inject your own opinions you bring someone down.
Dude, this is a technical discussion forum. If everyone just blew smoke up his ass this thread would be utterly useless. And we don't all have the time to sugercoat everything we say just in case we upset over-sensitive people. Harden up and learn from Ted's advice.

FC3S-NovaStyle 04-08-04 07:05 PM

after seeing the vid i truely belive it's workable.. and DCRotor thanx for the precise picture of the adaptor, i'll have my friend start fabricate up one

FDreaming 04-08-04 07:39 PM

This is awesome! I'm watching a M90 on Ebay right now. Can we get some dyno runs, or maybe even a vid of it at the track? Anyone wanna start mas producing the plates required to bolt that Eaton on there?

White_FC 04-08-04 08:12 PM


Originally posted by DEZERTE
Hes running a bypass valve to recycle the excess air back into the intake but it doesnt relieve enough of the pressure, hence the Blow off Valve.
Interesting and overly complex twin BOV setup... But ok.. Thats fair enough.. :)

I actually wouldn't mind running a supercharged 13b one day.. If only M90's wern't so expensive over here..

Sorry if i've missed this but im sure as shit not going back through 13 pages to find it..
Does the boost drop off at/near redline or not? (I saw the rough calcs people have been doing.. im asking if it actually does or not.. :) )

chris406 04-08-04 11:16 PM

that sounded good

DCRotor 04-09-04 08:34 AM

well im trying to post the second pic of the bracket that back of the SC to the air filter. but it wont post ( says i posted it already) anyways i need more info from someone that has a SC i need all the bolt hole sizes and i need the length from the rear mounting bolts to the front one.

-B-

RETed 04-09-04 09:05 AM

I'm sorry if I have insulted anyone - it was not my intention to do so.

I submitted my comments to prevent people from killing their engines and cars.  We don't need more FC's to blow-up due to projects that are over their owners heads.

There is "proper", and there is "cheap".  I tend to over-engineer things and don't like to go "getto".  Yes, you can get away with cheaper, but it's all going to bite you in the ass in the long run.

I've been toying with turbo'd Honda's probably before many of you have been born.  It's a similar application when running this SC on your NA, as the tricks to getting enough fuel into the engine for forced induction use is similar; this is why I brought up the BDFPR.  I would also question what happens to the pressure sensor when you do go into boost.  With the Hondas, this triggers the CHECK ENGINE light, but I think the stock FC NA pressure sensor clamps output if it does go into positive pressure.  This is good and bad - no worries about a CE light, but we don't know if the stock ignition timing is okay with the boosted engine.  So far, the original poster's experience has been positive, so you might be able to get away with it.  It might be a good idea to dial back the CAS a little just for safety...


-Ted

wozzoom 04-09-04 10:11 AM

Ted - I'm with you. Its funny how people jump on you when you are in fact just trying to inject a dose of reality and keep them from blowing there engines. BTW: Your experience and input is always appreciated.

There is always a right way and a wrong way to do things. I'm not saying that zBrown did something the wrong way, but I would say that his car is a PROTOTYPE! I commend zBrown for taking the initiative on this project but from the looks of things, there is a lot of room for improvement. This is where the power of the list comes in…people need to follow in zBrown’s footsteps and find ways to improve the design. We’ll post our findings, evolve, and eventually come up with the requirements for bulletproof design.

From my observations there are several things that I would love to know about this project:

1) Intake temps. Does this thing need an intercooler?
2) How does the NA boost sensor react to pressure? Maybe Mr. Cake can provide us some input on this?
3) Does the SC pulley slip with such a thin belt? It takes up to 50 HP to turn an Eaton M90 up to 14,000 RPM!!!
4) What are some sources for pullies and idlers from other junk-yard cars?

Aaron Cake 04-09-04 10:32 AM

To be honest, I have not done any formal testing on the NA boost sensor. All I can say that from my experience, it works under positive pressure...

I have a spare boost sensor around, and if I get time today I will put both vacuum and positive pressure to it and post the output. I can suck down a pretty good vacuum, but can only do about 1PSI with my mouth. Sadly, I don't have another suitable source of pressure....I'll also be spending all day making an intake manifold from scratch, so I may not have time...

I think Bambam7 has done some testing, so let me see if I can locate the thread..............

Found it: https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...hreadid=262629

Basically said what Ted said previously: at atmospheric, the sensor is outputting 5V (it's ref voltage). Any higher readings will still result in a 5V reading. So the NA ECU knows nothing of boost...

That said, I did run 8-12 PSI on stock timing without any apparent problems. When I tore the engine down, no pitting was evident on the apex seals.

Zer0 Cylinder 04-09-04 10:42 AM

hmmmmm 5 pages later.......is the discussion still about getting enough fuel?

DEZERTE 04-09-04 10:43 AM


Originally posted by Aaron Cake
I can suck down a pretty good vacuum, but can only do about 1PSI with my mouth.
Lol.


Originally posted by RETed
It might be a good idea to dial back the CAS a little just for safety...


-Ted

What is the CAS? I looked and found it in the FAQ, but I don't know what it does.

Bauer778 04-09-04 11:02 AM

I have a question about the idler pully, is the purpose of this just to adjust to tension of the belt or does it have another function?

Thanks
Dan

wozzoom 04-09-04 11:07 AM


Originally posted by Bauer778
I have a question about the idler pully, is the purpose of this just to adjust to tension of the belt or does it have another function?

Thanks
Dan

Correct. A Supercharger blower takes a lot of HP to turn. The idler pully keeps high tension on the belt so it doesn't slip.

For example, the Eaton M90 blower that zBrown installed requires ~50 HP to turn the unit to 14,000 RPM @ 10 PSI. (40 HP @ 5 PSI) Without proper tension, you'd melt the drive belt.

This is why I can't believe that zBrown's v-belt isn't slipping at higher RPMs.

Bauer778 04-09-04 11:14 AM

Thanks wozzoom

Is there a way that you can convert the belts to serpintine ones ?

Chimeron 04-09-04 11:19 AM

CAS = crank angle sensor. And as far as the 14k rpms, he said it's only seeing up to about 11k, but still close so you have a point.

wozzoom 04-09-04 11:22 AM

This is going to be the trick... I don't think we need to convert the entire engine to one serpentine belt but it would make things easier. Atkins Rotary has a kit that supposedly converts a 13B to serpentine belts, but there are no pictures of it on there website. 3rd gens also has a serpentine belt.

From the pictures that zBrown posted, it looks like he used the stock Power Steering pulley to drive his SC. (He has no power steering now) It should be possible to remove the stock power steering pulley and replace it with a 6-8 ribbed serpentine belt pulley.

wozzoom 04-09-04 11:24 AM


Originally posted by Chimeron
CAS = crank angle sensor. And as far as the 14k rpms, he said it's only seeing up to about 11k, but still close so you have a point.
http://www.magnusonproducts.com/images/mp90g2.jpg

We're still looking at 25 HP to drive the M90 to 11,000 RPM.

Bauer778 04-09-04 11:30 AM

If it takes 25 hp tp drive the Sc how much power are you actually getting out of it? For example when they say that the get 40 hp out of it , is that 40 hp on top of the 25hp, or is that 40hp and the minus the 25 hp to get the thing to run, so your net gain would only be 15 hp?

wozzoom 04-09-04 12:38 PM


Originally posted by Bauer778
If it takes 25 hp tp drive the Sc how much power are you actually getting out of it? For example when they say that the get 40 hp out of it , is that 40 hp on top of the 25hp, or is that 40hp and the minus the 25 hp to get the thing to run, so your net gain would only be 15 hp?
The HP gain is measured at the rear wheels. so using your numbers, the increase in engine HP would be 65 HP.

fg0d 04-09-04 01:13 PM

25hp lose compared to the gains is still worth it.

Would it be possible to hook the m90 to a TII?

It has to be feasible. A sc'd turbo :)

One drives the pulleys, one uses the exhaust gases.

SonicRaT 04-09-04 02:06 PM

You would be overworking them and exceeding their abilities. Instead of atmospheric pressure, you'd be feeding it 8psi and expecting it to compress that more, when it can hardly do that with 0 atmospheric pressure. I don't believe it could be done without swapping hardware.

DEZERTE 04-09-04 03:35 PM

when u say it takes 50hp to run the SC, are u saying that it saps 50hp or it requires 50hp... sapping 50hp would suck.

SonicRaT 04-09-04 03:47 PM

Basically, they're saying if you had the supercharger just flowing into a tank or something, it'd suck 40hp off the engine. But since it can help power itself, it removes that and then nets a gain, how big of a gain we can't tell until the car is dyno'd. But as it stands, it's definatly under 200hp as the injectors can't support higher without detonating.

wozzoom 04-10-04 09:19 AM


Originally posted by SonicRaT
Basically, they're saying if you had the supercharger just flowing into a tank or something, it'd suck 40hp off the engine. But since it can help power itself, it removes that and then nets a gain, how big of a gain we can't tell until the car is dyno'd. But as it stands, it's definatly under 200hp as the injectors can't support higher without detonating.
that's exactly what we're saying. There is no such thing as free HP! :p:

This is why the propper ammount of fuel is so important. Assuming you're adding ~60-70 HP to the total output of the engine. (40 of that is being used to power the SC, 30 is going to the wheels) The stock NA fuel system CAN NOT handle 70 more HP!

Peruvianrx7 04-10-04 10:18 AM

HOLY SHEEEET!!!!and I thought all the rotary gods had blown an apex seal...

Zbrown is my new Master Enthusiast!

P.S. I dont know if you answered this... but do you have an intercooler hooked up or thinking of buying one? Also I would not attempt this just cuz I would want to get a rebuild turbo 2 tranny, and a better clutch just in case my old stuff blows up so my price would be around umm 1300 bucks or something still good as hell...

DEZERTE 04-11-04 10:54 AM

do we get some specs/pictures of the bracket :D?

DCRotor 04-11-04 06:33 PM

well i have some pictures but i need more info ( see my post on the third page). Right now im working on the TB braket. All that is left is to fabe the mounting braket and make the other pictures more acurate.
\mm/
-B-

surfpac 04-12-04 10:40 AM

Any more pics? I'd like to see some with the piping in place and the V belt pulley.

wozzoom 04-13-04 08:22 AM

New question: Vacuum Source

The Fuel Pressure Regulator requires vacuum to operate. Since the intake manifold is now pressurized under boost, the FPR will no longer function. Correct? Should the vac source for the FPR be re-routed? Where to? Before the SC?

Next Question: Relief Valve

Would the stock TII relief (blowoff) valve be enough for this setup?

are_one 04-13-04 11:45 AM

Im know Im late, but DAMN!!!!! That is one of the greatest mods I've ever seen for our cars, Im going to nominate you for the Nobel prize. Your excellency, could we please get a write up, please!

SonicRaT 04-13-04 11:53 AM


Originally posted by are_one
Im know Im late, but DAMN!!!!! That is one of the greatest mods I've ever seen for our cars, Im going to nominate you for the Nobel prize. Your excellency, could we please get a write up, please!
What more do you need that's not already here?

wozzoom 04-13-04 12:42 PM


Originally posted by SonicRaT
What more do you need that's not already here?
Exactly. zBrown was the guinea pig. He did the initial install and inspired all of us NA owners. Some people are already following in his footsteps.

If you don't feel like doing the engineering to make this project work yourself, then you'll have to wait till someone finishes their install and posts their work.

Can we please quit it with the posts requesting a "write-up"?

gerbraldy 04-13-04 01:03 PM

I'm gonna put a s/c on my 88 vert ass soon as I get the s/c. I can make any brackets for anything, have a bunch of 1/4" steel and cutting and welding torch. The only this is, will my afm still actually work proparly?

SonicRaT 04-13-04 01:35 PM

The only thing missing is how to make the bracket itself, which is 'CUSTOM', I'm not a fan of the way it was setup though. I'd of attempted to use the airpump's mounting points, as well as the intake bolts to fab something up, a little easier and more workable in my opinion.

DEZERTE 04-13-04 02:29 PM


Originally posted by scathcart
And run out of steam big time on the top-end...
are u saying its going to "run out of steam" more-so than if there were no SC?

wozzoom 04-13-04 02:34 PM


Originally posted by SonicRaT
The only thing missing is how to make the bracket itself, which is 'CUSTOM', I'm not a fan of the way it was setup though. I'd of attempted to use the airpump's mounting points, as well as the intake bolts to fab something up, a little easier and more workable in my opinion.
I would think that the ACV bolts on the lower intake manifold would make a great mount for a bracket...assuming of course that you removed the ACV.

the air-pump mount is a little to far forward to use as a primary support, plus the aluminum waterpump casting there is prone to breaking.

that leaves the intake itself and the engine mount.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands