2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

moving the MAF * LOOK *

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-02, 09:12 PM
  #1  
Hks Ownz Me (

Thread Starter
 
importboi22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: corona,CA
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow moving the MAF * LOOK *

alrite i havent been lookin on the boards too much lately... due to the fact that soon ill be driving a galant VR4 for about 5 months ( hey atleast its a TOTAL sleeper ) but i was thinking that if i moved the MAF to after the intercooler that i would still be getting the same reading to the computer and it would be less restrictive on the turbo has anyone done this? any dyno gains? anyone done this.... im bored and i wanna try something new. anywho drop me a line!!!

ps. wouldnt your turbowhine get much louder with this mod? just a thought for you if you like turbo sounds
Old 08-26-02, 09:15 PM
  #2  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,241
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
Re: moving the MAF * LOOK *

Originally posted by importboi22
alrite i havent been lookin on the boards too much lately... due to the fact that soon ill be driving a galant VR4 for about 5 months ( hey atleast its a TOTAL sleeper ) but i was thinking that if i moved the MAF to after the intercooler that i would still be getting the same reading to the computer and it would be less restrictive on the turbo has anyone done this? any dyno gains? anyone done this.... im bored and i wanna try something new. anywho drop me a line!!!

ps. wouldnt your turbowhine get much louder with this mod? just a thought for you if you like turbo sounds
"search"
You are not the first to come up with this. There was a very recent post by Dale on the subject. He discusses how 500 hp Japan Fc's have done this for years.
Old 08-26-02, 09:19 PM
  #3  
Hks Ownz Me (

Thread Starter
 
importboi22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: corona,CA
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but pressing the search button is so hard!
Old 08-26-02, 09:56 PM
  #4  
My Custom Title > Your's

 
COsborne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ive heard the flapper slams open once you get boost. Its not made to withstand the heat of the air after the turbo and there is a temp sensor in the afm. I thought about doing it and decided not to.
Old 08-26-02, 10:12 PM
  #5  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,241
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally posted by COsborne
Ive heard the flapper slams open once you get boost. Its not made to withstand the heat of the air after the turbo and there is a temp sensor in the afm. I thought about doing it and decided not to.
Temp sensor is in the throttle elbow on TII's. The heat after the intercooler should be fine.

Again, they do this in Japan on 500 hp cars. It must do something. And slamming open... just doesn't make sense....
Old 08-26-02, 10:20 PM
  #6  
1JZ powered

 
jspecracer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Where there's only two seasons, hot and wet! I love Okinawa
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by COsborne
Ive heard the flapper slams open once you get boost. Its not made to withstand the heat of the air after the turbo and there is a temp sensor in the afm. I thought about doing it and decided not to.
UMM...air flow AFTER the intercooler will be fine. Flapper door slamming? WTF? Your joking right?

I've seen plenty of the AFM FC's with this "mod"...they run just fine.
Old 08-26-02, 10:26 PM
  #7  
GTR eater

 
soul assassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Tucson Arizona
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
slam da da da let eh boys be boys! (onyx)
yeah you will be fine, old trick
Old 08-26-02, 11:43 PM
  #8  
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,617
Received 457 Likes on 325 Posts
it's an AFM, not a MAF. BIIIIG difference.
Old 08-27-02, 02:32 AM
  #9  
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
RexRyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tucson
Posts: 2,946
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
so how do u do it? make wires longer and jus shove it in there?
Old 08-27-02, 05:53 AM
  #10  
GTR eater

 
soul assassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Tucson Arizona
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yep i used speaker wire once to extend em! lol!
Old 08-27-02, 06:32 AM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
EProdRx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So why would you do this anyway? What advantage does it give you?
Old 08-27-02, 06:47 AM
  #12  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: moving the MAF * LOOK *

Originally posted by importboi22
i was thinking that if i moved the MAF to after the intercooler that i would still be getting the same reading to the computer and it would be less restrictive on the turbo
A restriction is a restriction, no matter where you put it. Remember airflow (l/s, cfm) before the turbo is exactly the same as after it (pretty obvious really), so the pressure drop across the AFM will be exactly the same wherever you put it. Boost is irrelevant here, only airflow matters.
Old 08-27-02, 06:55 AM
  #13  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by scathcart
Temp sensor is in the throttle elbow on TII's.
There is also an air temp sensor built into the AFM. This is necessary because the AFM measures air volume flow (l/s), but the ECU needs to know air mass flow (kg/s) to calculate fuel requirements. For a constant mass, volume varies with temp, so by measuring volume flow and temp the ECU can calculate mass flow.
Old 08-27-02, 10:37 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
Henrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Re: moving the MAF * LOOK *

Originally posted by NZConvertible
A restriction is a restriction, no matter where you put it. Remember airflow (l/s, cfm) before the turbo is exactly the same as after it (pretty obvious really), so the pressure drop across the AFM will be exactly the same wherever you put it. Boost is irrelevant here, only airflow matters.
Not true actually, the mass flow is constant but the l/s (volume) will be less after the turbo than before during boost (as the air is compressed). I've always kinda wondered about this mod as I don't see how you can get the same readings from the AFM independant of boost. Basic physics would say you don't due to the change in velocity of the airflow. As an analogy, take a garden hose and drop the water against a surface, now squeeze off the opening to get a stream and spray it at the same surface - same amount of water flow (mass/s) but much different force on the surface (due to the higher velocity). The AFM will read low under boost, linearly so with boost if my math is correct.

For the guys running 500hp on this, they're obviously not running stock ECU's so all bets are off as you could compensate for this in the ECU.

Henrik
87TII
Old 08-27-02, 11:42 PM
  #15  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Re: Re: Re: moving the MAF * LOOK *

Originally posted by Henrik
For the guys running 500hp on this, they're obviously not running stock ECU's so all bets are off as you could compensate for this in the ECU.
Lots of extra fuel pressure, LOL. However, it seems to me that the car would run more lean as boost increases because of the added heat. It makes me wonder how true the rumors are about this mod. I don't suppose anybody has a picture?
Old 08-28-02, 12:02 AM
  #16  
...

 
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To me, this seems like a pretty hardcore mod to get the most possible power. And most hardcore guys have a standalone. And most people with standalones get rid of the afm altogether.
Old 08-28-02, 12:25 AM
  #17  
Damaged Little F*cker

 
FC Drifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: High Point, North Carolina
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ive heard of the mod but have no interest in doing it. the AFM is a restriction, plain and simple. the only way to make air flow better is to remove the AFM, with a standalone. i intend to do just that.

btw-if it was done, i would imagine the turbo would make a good bit more noise. its prolly the only reason i would do such a mod.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Robrods64
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
10-02-15 07:56 PM



Quick Reply: moving the MAF * LOOK *



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.