mechanical oil press vs. electronic oil press
#1
mechanical oil press vs. electronic oil press
is there as big difference between electical and mechanical oil pressure gauges in accuracy? I know there is foor boost gauges, but i was wondering about the oil...
#2
Same thing. The electrical gauges tend to be just a split slower reacting. The ups on this are if you are going to run a gauge in cabin or not. For in cabin uses fluid gauges should all be electrical.
#3
Originally Posted by iceblue
Same thing. The electrical gauges tend to be just a split slower reacting. The ups on this are if you are going to run a gauge in cabin or not. For in cabin uses fluid gauges should all be electrical.
wtf?
electrical gauges are more accurate and they dont react slower than mechanical gauges... how did you come up with that?
#4
Accuracy will depend on quialty of the calibration.. A cheapy eltrical verises a well calibrate mechanical.. and the mechanical will be more accurate.. same thing other way around. Responce should be the same, if not the mechanical may lag by a few miliseconds.. nothing noticable. Only advantage from eletrical is that you don't have a risk the the oil line cracking and leaking into the cabin.
So just buy a good brand guage and you should be fine as far as accuracy goes.
So just buy a good brand guage and you should be fine as far as accuracy goes.
#6
ditto, the stock gauge seems to be a bit on the less dependable side however because of it's location due to oil runoff from the filter, crap in the connector and the hokey external capacitor.
#7
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
electrical gauges are more accurate...
Personally I think 1/4-sweep gauges are practically useless, and since the affordable 3/4-sweep gauges are all mechanical, that's what I use.
Trending Topics
#8
You cannot make a blanket statement saying "mechanical gauges are more accurate than electronic gauges" - that's just pure bunk.
A cheapie mechanical gauge is going to have accuracy worth crap - look at Autometer boost gauges.
The advantage was the large sweep - mechanicals used be almost always 3/4-dial or 270-degree sweep, while electronic gauges were mostly 1/4-dial or 90-degree sweep.
Recently, most of the expensive (i.e. Japan) gauges are 270-degree sweep and electronic.
Thus resolution is not an issue anymore.
I rather install wires than a capillary tube.
No matter how the pro-mechanical-gauge group is going to argue, a cut in the line can possibly leak fluid in the cockpit.
This is why fuel pressure gauges are BANNED from the cockpit in top racing sanctions unless you're using an isolator.
Another advantage to electronic is that if the sensor goes bad or fails, you can just replace the sender most of the time.
If a mechanical gauge fails, you need to replace the entire gauge.
There are also certain gauges that you just cannot get in "mechanical" configuration.
There is no such thing as a "mechanical AFR gauge".
There is also no such thing as a "mechanical EGT gauge".
-Ted
A cheapie mechanical gauge is going to have accuracy worth crap - look at Autometer boost gauges.
The advantage was the large sweep - mechanicals used be almost always 3/4-dial or 270-degree sweep, while electronic gauges were mostly 1/4-dial or 90-degree sweep.
Recently, most of the expensive (i.e. Japan) gauges are 270-degree sweep and electronic.
Thus resolution is not an issue anymore.
I rather install wires than a capillary tube.
No matter how the pro-mechanical-gauge group is going to argue, a cut in the line can possibly leak fluid in the cockpit.
This is why fuel pressure gauges are BANNED from the cockpit in top racing sanctions unless you're using an isolator.
Another advantage to electronic is that if the sensor goes bad or fails, you can just replace the sender most of the time.
If a mechanical gauge fails, you need to replace the entire gauge.
There are also certain gauges that you just cannot get in "mechanical" configuration.
There is no such thing as a "mechanical AFR gauge".
There is also no such thing as a "mechanical EGT gauge".
-Ted
#9
Originally Posted by RETed
You cannot make a blanket statement saying "mechanical gauges are more accurate than electronic gauges" - that's just pure bunk.
A cheapie mechanical gauge is going to have accuracy worth crap - look at Autometer boost gauges.
The advantage was the large sweep - mechanicals used be almost always 3/4-dial or 270-degree sweep, while electronic gauges were mostly 1/4-dial or 90-degree sweep.
Recently, most of the expensive (i.e. Japan) gauges are 270-degree sweep and electronic.
Thus resolution is not an issue anymore.
Recently, most of the expensive (i.e. Japan) gauges are 270-degree sweep and electronic.
Thus resolution is not an issue anymore.
I rather install wires than a capillary tube.
No matter how the pro-mechanical-gauge group is going to argue, a cut in the line can possibly leak fluid in the cockpit.
No matter how the pro-mechanical-gauge group is going to argue, a cut in the line can possibly leak fluid in the cockpit.
Another advantage to electronic is that if the sensor goes bad or fails, you can just replace the sender most of the time.
If a mechanical gauge fails, you need to replace the entire gauge.
If a mechanical gauge fails, you need to replace the entire gauge.
There are also certain gauges that you just cannot get in "mechanical" configuration.
There is no such thing as a "mechanical AFR gauge".
There is also no such thing as a "mechanical EGT gauge".
There is no such thing as a "mechanical AFR gauge".
There is also no such thing as a "mechanical EGT gauge".
#11
Quote bomb!
hahah yeah, I was just pulling **** out of the air - it wasn't directed towards anyone in particular.
Some of those high calibrated mechanical gauges can get expensive too!
Cyberdyne / Nordskog / Intellitronix makes nice *digital* electronic gauges, but those senders always go bad.
Well, I'm talking in extremes here...
Clutch blowing out...
Collision of accident...
Hmmm...that's an interesting statement...
I've got a set of VDO electronic gauges for oil temp, oil pressure, and voltmeter.
I've had them for almost 10 years now without any problems; that's not a bad lifetime for something that was about $50 for sender and gauge!
Not everyone knows that...
-Ted
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
Just for the record, I don't think anybody did.
But cost still is, which is why I specifically used the word "affordable". 3/4-sweep electrical gauges are still way more expensive than 1/4-sweep electrical gauges, which are more expensive again than mechanical ones. Not everyone's got a ton of money to sink into gauges.
Cyberdyne / Nordskog / Intellitronix makes nice *digital* electronic gauges, but those senders always go bad.
It can, which is why you take simple steps to prevent that happening. Using strong quality line, making sure it's not rubbing on anything, etc. A broken line inside the cabin can usually be attributed to poor installation. Personally I've never had a problem, probably because I'm very careful with the install.
Clutch blowing out...
Collision of accident...
True, but I would say an electrical gauge is a lot more likely to "go bad" than a mechanical one. Not likely, just more likely. Quality mechancial gauges are very reliable.
I've got a set of VDO electronic gauges for oil temp, oil pressure, and voltmeter.
I've had them for almost 10 years now without any problems; that's not a bad lifetime for something that was about $50 for sender and gauge!
O2 sensors and thermocouples are electrical devices, so I'm pretty sure most people realise you don't attach a mechanical gauge to them. Plus the topic is oil pressure gauges.
-Ted
#12
Originally Posted by fcdrifter13
Am I the only one who runs 2 gauges one on turbo inlet pressure and one for the block pressure.
You mean you run a boost gauge at the inlet of the turbo compressor?
Wouldn't that either be "0" or slight vacuum, depending on your air filter system?
"Block pressure"?
You mean like a normal boost gauge?
-Ted
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smikels
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
08-18-15 02:26 PM