2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

mechanical oil press vs. electronic oil press

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-05 | 11:40 PM
  #1  
89gtufc3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
mechanical oil press vs. electronic oil press

is there as big difference between electical and mechanical oil pressure gauges in accuracy? I know there is foor boost gauges, but i was wondering about the oil...
Old 09-01-05 | 11:57 PM
  #2  
iceblue's Avatar
Passing life by

 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 2
From: Scotland, USA
Same thing. The electrical gauges tend to be just a split slower reacting. The ups on this are if you are going to run a gauge in cabin or not. For in cabin uses fluid gauges should all be electrical.
Old 09-02-05 | 01:23 AM
  #3  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by iceblue
Same thing. The electrical gauges tend to be just a split slower reacting. The ups on this are if you are going to run a gauge in cabin or not. For in cabin uses fluid gauges should all be electrical.

wtf?

electrical gauges are more accurate and they dont react slower than mechanical gauges... how did you come up with that?
Old 09-02-05 | 01:40 AM
  #4  
trainwreck517's Avatar
Rx-hippie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
From: Torrance CA
Accuracy will depend on quialty of the calibration.. A cheapy eltrical verises a well calibrate mechanical.. and the mechanical will be more accurate.. same thing other way around. Responce should be the same, if not the mechanical may lag by a few miliseconds.. nothing noticable. Only advantage from eletrical is that you don't have a risk the the oil line cracking and leaking into the cabin.

So just buy a good brand guage and you should be fine as far as accuracy goes.
Old 09-02-05 | 01:50 AM
  #5  
iceblue's Avatar
Passing life by

 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 2
From: Scotland, USA
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
wtf?

electrical gauges are more accurate and they dont react slower than mechanical gauges... how did you come up with that?
Old 09-02-05 | 01:54 AM
  #6  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 47
From: Central Florida
ditto, the stock gauge seems to be a bit on the less dependable side however because of it's location due to oil runoff from the filter, crap in the connector and the hokey external capacitor.
Old 09-02-05 | 03:04 AM
  #7  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
electrical gauges are more accurate...
That's a huge assumption that's just as likely to be wrong as right. Accuracy depends far more of quality of design and manufacture rather than how the signal is sent. An expensive, quality mechanical gauge is going to be more accurate than a cheap, nasty electrical one.

Personally I think 1/4-sweep gauges are practically useless, and since the affordable 3/4-sweep gauges are all mechanical, that's what I use.
Old 09-02-05 | 03:41 AM
  #8  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 19
From: n
You cannot make a blanket statement saying "mechanical gauges are more accurate than electronic gauges" - that's just pure bunk.
A cheapie mechanical gauge is going to have accuracy worth crap - look at Autometer boost gauges.

The advantage was the large sweep - mechanicals used be almost always 3/4-dial or 270-degree sweep, while electronic gauges were mostly 1/4-dial or 90-degree sweep.
Recently, most of the expensive (i.e. Japan) gauges are 270-degree sweep and electronic.
Thus resolution is not an issue anymore.

I rather install wires than a capillary tube.
No matter how the pro-mechanical-gauge group is going to argue, a cut in the line can possibly leak fluid in the cockpit.
This is why fuel pressure gauges are BANNED from the cockpit in top racing sanctions unless you're using an isolator.

Another advantage to electronic is that if the sensor goes bad or fails, you can just replace the sender most of the time.
If a mechanical gauge fails, you need to replace the entire gauge.

There are also certain gauges that you just cannot get in "mechanical" configuration.
There is no such thing as a "mechanical AFR gauge".
There is also no such thing as a "mechanical EGT gauge".


-Ted
Old 09-02-05 | 06:18 AM
  #9  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by RETed
You cannot make a blanket statement saying "mechanical gauges are more accurate than electronic gauges" - that's just pure bunk.
Just for the record, I don't think anybody did.

A cheapie mechanical gauge is going to have accuracy worth crap - look at Autometer boost gauges.
I did once. Never again...

The advantage was the large sweep - mechanicals used be almost always 3/4-dial or 270-degree sweep, while electronic gauges were mostly 1/4-dial or 90-degree sweep.
Recently, most of the expensive (i.e. Japan) gauges are 270-degree sweep and electronic.
Thus resolution is not an issue anymore.
But cost still is, which is why I specifically used the word "affordable". 3/4-sweep electrical gauges are still way more expensive than 1/4-sweep electrical gauges, which are more expensive again than mechanical ones. Not everyone's got a ton of money to sink into gauges.

I rather install wires than a capillary tube.
No matter how the pro-mechanical-gauge group is going to argue, a cut in the line can possibly leak fluid in the cockpit.
It can, which is why you take simple steps to prevent that happening. Using strong quality line, making sure it's not rubbing on anything, etc. A broken line inside the cabin can usually be attributed to poor installation. Personally I've never had a problem, probably because I'm very careful with the install.

Another advantage to electronic is that if the sensor goes bad or fails, you can just replace the sender most of the time.
If a mechanical gauge fails, you need to replace the entire gauge.
True, but I would say an electrical gauge is a lot more likely to "go bad" than a mechanical one. Not likely, just more likely. Quality mechancial gauges are very reliable.

There are also certain gauges that you just cannot get in "mechanical" configuration.
There is no such thing as a "mechanical AFR gauge".
There is also no such thing as a "mechanical EGT gauge".
O2 sensors and thermocouples are electrical devices, so I'm pretty sure most people realise you don't attach a mechanical gauge to them. Plus the topic is oil pressure gauges.
Old 09-02-05 | 06:28 AM
  #10  
fcdrifter13's Avatar
Play Well
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
From: We're all fine here now, thank you. How are you?
Am I the only one who runs 2 gauges one on turbo inlet pressure and one for the block pressure.
Old 09-02-05 | 07:23 AM
  #11  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 19
From: n
Quote bomb!


Originally Posted by NZConvertible
Just for the record, I don't think anybody did.
hahah yeah, I was just pulling **** out of the air - it wasn't directed towards anyone in particular.


But cost still is, which is why I specifically used the word "affordable". 3/4-sweep electrical gauges are still way more expensive than 1/4-sweep electrical gauges, which are more expensive again than mechanical ones. Not everyone's got a ton of money to sink into gauges.
Some of those high calibrated mechanical gauges can get expensive too!
Cyberdyne / Nordskog / Intellitronix makes nice *digital* electronic gauges, but those senders always go bad.


It can, which is why you take simple steps to prevent that happening. Using strong quality line, making sure it's not rubbing on anything, etc. A broken line inside the cabin can usually be attributed to poor installation. Personally I've never had a problem, probably because I'm very careful with the install.
Well, I'm talking in extremes here...
Clutch blowing out...
Collision of accident...


True, but I would say an electrical gauge is a lot more likely to "go bad" than a mechanical one. Not likely, just more likely. Quality mechancial gauges are very reliable.
Hmmm...that's an interesting statement...
I've got a set of VDO electronic gauges for oil temp, oil pressure, and voltmeter.
I've had them for almost 10 years now without any problems; that's not a bad lifetime for something that was about $50 for sender and gauge!


O2 sensors and thermocouples are electrical devices, so I'm pretty sure most people realise you don't attach a mechanical gauge to them. Plus the topic is oil pressure gauges.
Not everyone knows that...


-Ted
Old 09-02-05 | 07:24 AM
  #12  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 19
From: n
Originally Posted by fcdrifter13
Am I the only one who runs 2 gauges one on turbo inlet pressure and one for the block pressure.
Turbo inlet pressure?
You mean you run a boost gauge at the inlet of the turbo compressor?
Wouldn't that either be "0" or slight vacuum, depending on your air filter system?

"Block pressure"?
You mean like a normal boost gauge?


-Ted
Old 09-02-05 | 07:50 AM
  #13  
fcdrifter13's Avatar
Play Well
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
From: We're all fine here now, thank you. How are you?
no im talkin about oil pressure aint that what we are talking about here.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
Microtech
30
04-23-16 07:37 PM
Snoopy FD
Build Threads
25
12-08-15 02:45 PM
smikels
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
08-18-15 02:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 PM.