2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Limitations of 2.5" Intake Piping vs. 3"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-05 | 02:15 PM
  #1  
pianoprodigy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Missin' my FD
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, FL (Tampa Bay Area)
Limitations of 2.5" Intake Piping vs. 3"

So, I've noticed that most people use 3" intakes for their "cold-air" setups. I'm planning on on fabricating my own CAI for my supercharged FC particularly because my underhood temps get ridiculous with the extra heat of the supercharger. I've found some 2.5" (internal diameter) tubing that should work really well; however, I'm concerned that it might be too small, and therefore restrictive. In thinking about this, I thought about my FD which uses 2.5" diameter IC piping and has no problems. I don't know if that's significant, but it is interesting. Anyways, I know how to calculate the area of the circle. 2.5" v. 3" has an internal area of 4.9 square inches and 7 square inches respectively. Looking at the issue that way, it seems that the step up to 3" is significant. Does anyone have any hard numbers as to why I shouldn't use 2.5" tubing? Doesn't the AFM go down to 2.5" on the engine side anyways?

Thanks for the input.
Old 07-02-05 | 03:17 PM
  #2  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
I'd just stick with the same diameter as your inlet for the charger.
Old 07-02-05 | 10:46 PM
  #3  
91mazdarx7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,572
Likes: 0
From: pennsylvania
i am making a intake for my t2 and am using either 2.5'' or 3'' piping as long as it's the same size or bigger piping as your superchargers inlet it shouln't restrict air
Old 07-04-05 | 06:26 AM
  #4  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
The bigger the pipe is, the less work the engine has to do to suck in air at a certain rate. The less work the engine has to do sucking (and blowing), the more power you get at the wheels. For intake pipeworks it's as simple as that. The actual power difference will depend on all the other restrictions the engine has to overcome, but the bottom line is if you reduce or remove a restriction you will get more power out the back. Fit the biggest pipe you can fit.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
01-30-19 06:31 AM



Quick Reply: Limitations of 2.5" Intake Piping vs. 3"



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 PM.