2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Less restrictive S4 MAF??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-06, 11:07 PM
  #1  
Card-carrying Rotorhead

Thread Starter
 
Unseen24-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Quebec
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Less restrictive S4 MAF??

is there a less restrictive MAF on the market or is there a way to make the existing MAF more efficient? The whole door/paddle thinger seems dumb to me IMO.
Old 08-07-06, 01:25 AM
  #2  
Rotax?! WTF is a Rotax!?

 
StarScreaM2k1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
apparently tho its better then the S5 ones. I think S5's can use the Mazda 929 ones. Not sure if we can. I suggest going with a Aftermarket ECU and getting rid of the AFM.
Old 08-07-06, 02:00 AM
  #3  
Registered Loser

iTrader: (6)
 
walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Whiterock
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, unless you want to try porting it. Just move it closer to the TB.
Old 08-07-06, 03:41 AM
  #4  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by walken
Just move it closer to the TB.
That won't make it any less restrictive. It will make it hotter though...
Old 08-07-06, 09:48 AM
  #5  
Card-carrying Rotorhead

Thread Starter
 
Unseen24-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Quebec
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what kind of standalone aftermarket ECU would work well and be resonably priced?
Old 08-07-06, 10:07 AM
  #6  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,791
Likes: 0
Received 113 Likes on 95 Posts
Ouch, my brain...

First off, there isn't really anything wrong with the S4 AFM. I personally know several people with almost 400HP on the stock AFM, so it can't be all bad. And your NA GXL will never come close to maxing it out for flow. The S5 AFM is supposed to be worse then the S4 due to it's smaller diameter.

If you really, really want to get rid of the AFM, then something like the MAP-ECU is your only choice if you don't want to go full standalone. It's a small piggyback that repalces your AFM with a MAP sensor. For about $500. Does work reasonably well though...

Going further, there is a full standalone which completely replaces the stock EFI system. The price ranges from $140 to infinity with around $1000 being the norm. Keep in mind that it's a significant wiring job and then a good amount of time will be needed to make the car run properly (likely including dyno time).
Old 08-12-06, 01:09 AM
  #7  
Full Member

 
crazyasu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
Ouch, my brain...

First off, there isn't really anything wrong with the S4 AFM. I personally know several people with almost 400HP on the stock AFM, so it can't be all bad. And your NA GXL will never come close to maxing it out for flow. The S5 AFM is supposed to be worse then the S4 due to it's smaller diameter.

If you really, really want to get rid of the AFM, then something like the MAP-ECU is your only choice if you don't want to go full standalone. It's a small piggyback that repalces your AFM with a MAP sensor. For about $500. Does work reasonably well though...

Going further, there is a full standalone which completely replaces the stock EFI system. The price ranges from $140 to infinity with around $1000 being the norm. Keep in mind that it's a significant wiring job and then a good amount of time will be needed to make the car run properly (likely including dyno time).
if I remove my stock air intake and replace it with a CAI set-up...does the stock ECU automatically adjust the air/fuel ratio
Old 08-12-06, 02:32 AM
  #8  
R.I.P. Icemark

iTrader: (2)
 
staticguitar313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: gilbert, arizona
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MegaSquirt Plug n' Play?
Old 08-12-06, 08:36 AM
  #9  
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.

iTrader: (3)
 
classicauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hagersville Ontario
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by crazyasu
if I remove my stock air intake and replace it with a CAI set-up...does the stock ECU automatically adjust the air/fuel ratio
no
Old 08-12-06, 09:06 AM
  #10  
rotorhead
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,187
Received 435 Likes on 267 Posts
First off, there isn't really anything wrong with the S4 AFM.

This is true and I will have some dyno results to prove it in a few days when I get my dyno sheet emailed to me. There is this myth out there that the stock MAF is this super restrictive thing just waiting to be thrown away in order to give you gobs of horsepower, even on an N/A. Just tossing the AFM and going standalone (as compared to SAFC with CAS advanced) probably netted me 5hp with everything dialed in properly under WOT. The AFM does have its limits, but from personal experience it's not what everyone makes it out to be.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
R|©haźd
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
09-24-15 11:39 AM



Quick Reply: Less restrictive S4 MAF??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 PM.