This is just plain wrong!!!
#26
Driving RX7's since 1979
iTrader: (43)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: So Cal where the OC/LA/SB counties meet
Posts: 6,096
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
Same haircut, same ........
Rotary car isn't a rotary without a rotary in it.
Actually, that's a nice job you did on that Retro-fit into your Vert. Nice job.
BUT, a rotary car isn't a rotary without a rotary under the hood. Simply truth.
How about........... a 20B into a Mustang, or a 20B into a Camero. Hey, better still. A 20B into a Corvette.
Actually, I remember a Rotary in a Model T at last yeart 7Stock, and a Rotary in a VW Bus. So, I guess fair is fair.
Actually, that's a nice job you did on that Retro-fit into your Vert. Nice job.
BUT, a rotary car isn't a rotary without a rotary under the hood. Simply truth.
How about........... a 20B into a Mustang, or a 20B into a Camero. Hey, better still. A 20B into a Corvette.
Actually, I remember a Rotary in a Model T at last yeart 7Stock, and a Rotary in a VW Bus. So, I guess fair is fair.
#27
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I also think its kinda dumb. Will the chassis really handle that much torque? I think any Z would be alot more fun. A 240Z with a reinforced chassis and a V8. Ive seen turbo kits for those too. Yeao, I dont think theres any way in hell any FC could keep up with a TT V8 in a light car. Well itd be fun to seem it.
Sky
He should have done a 240Z and put a VG30dett<300ZX tt>
Sky
He should have done a 240Z and put a VG30dett<300ZX tt>
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: yeah
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why do ppl think it wont handle torque?but it can handle a 3 rotor's torque?
do u all not think when u post?
600lbs my ***.a 427 only weighs 500 lbs.a fully dressed 20b 550 lbs.
another things its a damn car..hey v8 cool job i will be following into this project too.i will either use a ls1 into a tubbed front or a v10 with a cut firewall and tubbed front.both motors are going for close to the same.2k dollar difference.oh yeah 3rd gen.oh it is fun as hell nowing u can drive without having to worry if something is gonna happen every 10 secs.bye bye rotary welcome n/a.
13brew 375lbs i believe.lt1is around 425-450.ls1 50lbs less.
do u all not think when u post?
600lbs my ***.a 427 only weighs 500 lbs.a fully dressed 20b 550 lbs.
another things its a damn car..hey v8 cool job i will be following into this project too.i will either use a ls1 into a tubbed front or a v10 with a cut firewall and tubbed front.both motors are going for close to the same.2k dollar difference.oh yeah 3rd gen.oh it is fun as hell nowing u can drive without having to worry if something is gonna happen every 10 secs.bye bye rotary welcome n/a.
13brew 375lbs i believe.lt1is around 425-450.ls1 50lbs less.
#30
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From Granny's Speed Shop:
LT1 495 For the long Block
LS1 395 for the long block
Of course AC, PS will add to that, but it won't throw the handling off as much as everyone would like to think. Couple that with the pictures and its easy to see the LS1 will sit farther back in then engine bay (more towards the center of the car) than the 20B.....
Daniel
LT1 495 For the long Block
LS1 395 for the long block
Of course AC, PS will add to that, but it won't throw the handling off as much as everyone would like to think. Couple that with the pictures and its easy to see the LS1 will sit farther back in then engine bay (more towards the center of the car) than the 20B.....
Daniel
#31
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Silkworm
I'd so love to have that car..
305HP in a 2900lb car? HELL YA!
All you V8 bashers suck
hehehe
PaulC
I'd so love to have that car..
305HP in a 2900lb car? HELL YA!
All you V8 bashers suck
hehehe
PaulC
#32
What Subscription?
Thread Starter
The ratio of correctly accomplished swaps vs HACK jobs is probably 1:20. It may be a well done swap, its not my cup of Tea. If your gonna do a V8 swap why not something like the Hemi into a Sprite?. I prefer my RX7's rotary powered. I may do a swap someday, but I have other fish to fry
#34
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Pittsburgh Pa
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Same haircut, same ........
Originally posted by HOZZMANRX7
Rotary car isn't a rotary without a rotary in it.
Actually, that's a nice job you did on that Retro-fit into your Vert. Nice job.
BUT, a rotary car isn't a rotary without a rotary under the hood. Simply truth.
How about........... a 20B into a Mustang, or a 20B into a Camero. Hey, better still. A 20B into a Corvette.
Actually, I remember a Rotary in a Model T at last yeart 7Stock, and a Rotary in a VW Bus. So, I guess fair is fair.
Rotary car isn't a rotary without a rotary in it.
Actually, that's a nice job you did on that Retro-fit into your Vert. Nice job.
BUT, a rotary car isn't a rotary without a rotary under the hood. Simply truth.
How about........... a 20B into a Mustang, or a 20B into a Camero. Hey, better still. A 20B into a Corvette.
Actually, I remember a Rotary in a Model T at last yeart 7Stock, and a Rotary in a VW Bus. So, I guess fair is fair.
#36
Brother of the Rotary
iTrader: (2)
Re: only the un-educated would bash this swap.
Originally posted by HOZZMANRX7
So fans of the Wankle and RX7 purests are all un-educated????
So fans of the Wankle and RX7 purests are all un-educated????
There is nothing wrong with being a 'purist', but its not some sort of automotive blasphemy to put another engine into an RX-7. Its just a metal shell. There is no spiritual connection between it and its engine.
Also, many of the people that discount such conversions usually have never even seen, let a lone driven in one. So they spew forth the typical rhetoric: Its too heavy. I'll handle like crap. It messes up the perfect 50/50 distribution etc etc...blah blah blah
Anyways, not trying to start ****...
#37
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think we have dispelled those myths in this thread. After talking to Mike (the guy that did the swap) he claims is car LOST weight in the front end on the conversion. The cost of this is comparable to a full To4, haltech, fmic ect ect ect it would take a 13BT to keep up with this. And the 13BT wont touch the torque that this thing will pound out. Plus you get a 6spd tranny in the whole conversion.
Last edited by BlackFC; 09-13-02 at 03:17 PM.
#40
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rev higher. You'll have more horse power and be slammed into your seat harder.
I'd love to see a 7.0L turbo-charged rotary. Hell, I'd love a 2.6L dual rotary power plant. More displacement = more power.
I'd love to see a 7.0L turbo-charged rotary. Hell, I'd love a 2.6L dual rotary power plant. More displacement = more power.
#41
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Revving higher doesn't make a car nicer to drive on the street. It gets louder, it gets less reliable, the more you tune the motor for high RPM power the shittier your idle will be.
Daniel
Daniel
#42
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
Originally posted by BlackFC
Torque is what makes the girlies wet.
Torque is what makes the girlies wet.
Its the 3000 to 3500 rpm harmonic of a rotary that gets girls wet.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pfsantos
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
09-30-15 01:29 PM