2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

just got my S5 horrible gas milage! help :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-05, 10:45 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7ofdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question just got my S5 horrible gas milage! help :)

ok i've had the car for 3 days and its drinking gasoline more so than expected.. i've read up here are somethings i found i think a good price but i know you guys probably know the best deals and can think of something else im missing.

from rx7.com/store

NGK Plug Wire Set - 86-91 IGRCZE02 $29.95 $29.95
NGK BUR7EQ Plugs IGBUR7EQ $7.50 $7.50
NGK BUR9EQ Plugs IGBUR9EQ $7.50 $7.50
RP Aftermarket Fuel Filter - 86-91 FL900201 $25.00 $25.00
RP Aftermarket O2 Sensor FL900311 $40.00 $40.00

anything else?

also my future mods are going to be s-afc, intake of some sort and rb collected header rx7.com high flow cat and some sort of aftermarket exhaust either rx7.com dual catback or rb dual cat back.

IF you have any suggestions for me let me know...
the car has 82k miles just passed california emissions extremely easy!

THANK you in advance!!!
Old 07-11-05, 11:05 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
nubian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: calgary canada
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
k, just so you dont go spend a bunch of cash for nothing... what kind of millage are we talking about, my s4 t2 gets 190-220 miles on a tank (16 gallon ). i just converted it from metric, if its easier, 300-350kms/60 liter tank.

if this is what you get, then you boost everytime you get in , on the highway at 65-70mph i can get 325-350 miles out of a tank. my car is i great shape with only 78k miles on it.

you have the right idea with an o/2 sensor and plugs/wires. check your wires for the resistance as spec'd in the fsm/hayes/chilton. if they are acceptable, you might want to think of a msd ign box instead, will steady the current and prolly help a little more than just new plugs/wires.

good luck

Last edited by nubian; 07-11-05 at 11:08 PM.
Old 07-11-05, 11:07 PM
  #3  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
homebrewer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, it would help if you told us what kind of mileage you are getting. If you are getting in the high teens you are ok. If you feel you should be getting better fuel economy out of a 1.3L Wankel you're SOL.
Old 07-11-05, 11:26 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7ofdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok haha i know these motors get bad gas milage, im not exactly sure but the milage but i used more than an 1/8 of a tank going about 40 miles and its an 18.5 gallon tank? so thats below 20mpg i was driving about 70-75mph. I know its not that bad i guess but know it can be better so i want to fix anything that can be fixed.

Last edited by rx7ofdoom; 07-11-05 at 11:39 PM.
Old 07-12-05, 01:10 AM
  #5  
Junior Member

 
redturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ny
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are wrong about the tank capacity ,it is more like 16.5 not 18.5 .
Old 07-12-05, 01:31 AM
  #6  
R.I.P. Icemark

iTrader: (2)
 
staticguitar313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: gilbert, arizona
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by redturbo
You are wrong about the tank capacity ,it is more like 16.5 not 18.5 .
no actually YOUR wrong s5's have an 18.5 gallon tank, s4's had 16.5, asshat.
Old 07-12-05, 01:36 AM
  #7  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7ofdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok but as i was saying anyone have any places have better prices? or anything else i should get to help performance/ economy?
Old 07-12-05, 01:38 AM
  #8  
Rotary Freak

 
Syonyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sounds about right, I'm betting changing the O2 sensor will help it out a bit, since people tend to neglect those.

Also, 70mph is a bit slow for best fuel economy. Most people see better fuel economy around 80-85 with the windows closed.

-=Russ=-
Old 07-12-05, 02:03 AM
  #9  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7ofdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so your saying go faster for better fuel economy ingenious! haha i normally went 80-85 in my gti i was kinda sad thinking going slower would help
Old 07-12-05, 02:05 AM
  #10  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7ofdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh also i was wondering what octane do i use? haha i haven't filled up yet but need to soon
Old 07-12-05, 02:44 AM
  #11  
Junior Member

 
JacKaL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nubian
k, just so you dont go spend a bunch of cash for nothing... what kind of millage are we talking about, my s4 t2 gets 190-220 miles on a tank (16 gallon ). i just converted it from metric, if its easier, 300-350kms/60 liter tank.

if this is what you get, then you boost everytime you get in , on the highway at 65-70mph i can get 325-350 miles out of a tank. my car is i great shape with only 78k miles on it.

you have the right idea with an o/2 sensor and plugs/wires. check your wires for the resistance as spec'd in the fsm/hayes/chilton. if they are acceptable, you might want to think of a msd ign box instead, will steady the current and prolly help a little more than just new plugs/wires.

good luck

Originally Posted by homebrewer
Well, it would help if you told us what kind of mileage you are getting
well he did... 190 to 220 miles per 16 gallons.. 190\16 =11.875 220\16= 13.75 .. so 12 to 14 miles per gallon
Old 07-12-05, 03:24 AM
  #12  
Stage VII+ Z32TT

 
TwinTurbineZ32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rowland Heights, CA
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
87 for n/a and 91 for turbo model.
Old 07-12-05, 08:22 AM
  #13  
ERTW

iTrader: (1)
 
coldfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there is no way that going faster will give you better gas mileage, it's a pretty simple matter of air resistance. i learned this in first year physics.
in fact, at higher speeds just going a little bit faster increases the power needed to overcome the air resistance, since the relationship is exponential...

anyways, there are some pretty basic things you can do for gas mileage.
as for the O2 sensor, i used to think it made a difference, but i don't think it's that much. i found out the other day my O2 sensor is not working at all. i am still getting about 600km to a tank.
regardless it's good to have a working one if you are running with the stock ECU.

also, maybe i missed it, but is this car turbo or not? if it is, then this type of mileage you are mentioning sounds reasonable, unless you are not getting into boost at all, just highway cruising.
if it's NA, you should be seeing about 20 mpg or so average, otherwise you have problems somewhere...
Old 07-12-05, 08:29 AM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
duffles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: ILLINOIS
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i just had REALLy bad gas mileage and found a scraped up fuel hose dripping only when the car was on. almost lost everything, luckily i found it before the my whole engine bay went up in flames.
Old 07-12-05, 09:40 AM
  #15  
MattB

 
MattB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Haverhill, MA
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there is no way that going faster will give you better gas mileage, it's a pretty simple matter of air resistance. i learned this in first year physics.
dont be ignorant...people have proven that they get better gas mileage at higher speeds. the engine is simply more efficient at a certain RPM range


my 2 cents....
-Matt
Old 07-12-05, 09:54 AM
  #16  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (19)
 
Natey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,462
Received 1,447 Likes on 749 Posts
lol, Poor guy still never got a straight answer.

Yeah, that shopping list looks about right, IMO. One other inexpensive thing that people tend to forget about is the air filter. A new one's cheap and easy to replace.
Old 07-12-05, 10:03 AM
  #17  
strike up the paean

 
aznpoopy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: fort lee, nj
Posts: 2,495
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
sparkplugs.com has those plugs for $6.40

ngk wireset for $21.62 or something weird.
Old 07-12-05, 11:52 AM
  #18  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7ofdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yahoo people answering questions. it has a new air filter and those look like good prices. Im not sure if this is true but i remember reading somewhere that you can get a universal o2 sensor for like $8 anyone know of this?
AND the car is not turbo its n/a
Old 07-12-05, 12:08 PM
  #19  
ERTW

iTrader: (1)
 
coldfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MattB
dont be ignorant...people have proven that they get better gas mileage at higher speeds. the engine is simply more efficient at a certain RPM range


my 2 cents....
-Matt

sorry, i'm just stating a simple fact. if you could post a thread or something where someone has actually quantitatively done a study on this, please do so.

it's totally possible that you may get better mileage at 80 mph compared to 70 mph due to mechanical reasons, i just don't see it as a way to get better gas mileage.

also to the person who started the thread:
if you are planning on getting an SAFC it will help you with gas consumption (you will be leaning out the fuel mixture to gain power) and you can actually get rid of/disconnect the O2 sensor. you can tune a low throttle cruise map, and you won't need the O2 sensor. actually it's probably a better idea to not use the O2 sensor if you are using SAFC correction, as i'm sure the oscillating closed loop ECU operation would be hard to tune with.
keep in mind it may only take you a month or so to make up the cost of the SAFC in gas savings if you tune properly
Old 07-12-05, 12:24 PM
  #20  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7ofdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok, that sounds good to me , but im not modding just yet i have to sell my other car to get some $ to buy perforamnce parts.
Old 07-12-05, 12:27 PM
  #21  
raysspl.com

 
d0 Luck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: L.A.
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
want good gas mileage? sell the car and get a civic.
Old 07-12-05, 12:29 PM
  #22  
Rotary Freak

 
Syonyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
*makes unhappy noises and starts posting*

The comment about going faster wasn't a general statement, it was a statement about FCs, specifically. It has been observed by many people, including Wayne (who is one of the most methodical testers around here, driving the exact same highway route to work every day), that a stock FC will get better fuel economy at 80-85 mph than at 65-70mph. The engine efficiency increases enough that it overcomes the increased air drag, and leads to better fuel economy. It doesn't appear to make sense, but it happens. My personal theory is that the only reason it stops getting more efficient around 85 is that the engine hits 3500 RPM and the stock ECU goes into a rather rich mode - with a properly tuned standalone, the most efficient speed may still be higher.

The O2 sensor doesn't make a big difference around town, but it does matter on the highway. Numbers I've seen indicate people get around 17mpg on the highway without the O2 sensor, 22 with it.

I'm currently running with a SAFC-II installed and the O2 sensor disconnected. Tuned slightly lean of stoich, I'm getting 20-22mpg highway. I'm planning to reconnect the O2 sensor this weekend and see if it makes a difference - closed loop will still be controlled by the O2 sensor, but the open loop mode that happens frequently in climbing hills will be leaner, and will help improve fuel economy.

The one big difference I've seen with the SAFC is that high RPM fuel consumption has dropped dramatically. I'm pulling out 30-40% up high, still running rich, and making good power. However, I no longer can watch the gas gauge drop while doing autocross or screwing around on winding roads.

I'm not convinced that a SAFC will pay for itsself in fuel savings any time soon. The cost ($250 or so) just is too high to make up in a few mpg, at least short term.

Another thing to consider is getting your injectors cleaned. Take them out, get them reverse flow ultrasonic flushed. They'll spray better, and you'll most likely see better fuel economy.

-=Russ=-
Old 07-12-05, 12:34 PM
  #23  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (19)
 
Natey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,462
Received 1,447 Likes on 749 Posts
an OEM 02 sensor costs about 65 bucks from the stealership, IIRC. A universal one costs about half that.
Old 07-12-05, 02:11 PM
  #24  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7ofdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok here you go i drove less than 30 miles and used about 3 gallons and majority of that was highway at 60mph

Also i found an o2 for $18 on sparkplugs.com by denso
http://sparkplugs.com/more_info.asp?...92441&pid=1788

should work fine right?

Last edited by rx7ofdoom; 07-12-05 at 02:26 PM.
Old 07-12-05, 02:15 PM
  #25  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7ofdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by d0 Luck
want good gas mileage? sell the car and get a civic.
by the way your an idiot. My gti got over 30mpg if i wanted good gas milage id keep that. Im not an idiot i know rotary isn't great milage but when im geting 10-12mpg i think somethings wrong.


Quick Reply: just got my S5 horrible gas milage! help :)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.