2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Intake modifications(small and large)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-09, 11:05 PM
  #1  
Working on my car.

Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Eva001Ikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Intake modifications(small and large)

I'm sure a few people have done this but what I am looking for people who have done things like hood scoops (just for the intake). Air boxes cutting holes and running ducting. I'd like to see some different stuff, i'm actually thinking of making a small hole and getting a hood scoop fabricated or something to get good air to my intake. So lemme know what you guys got.
Old 08-26-09, 12:11 AM
  #2  
I blame the TPS

 
Chris Boots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MT
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Small intake scoop over the intake filter on my 1st gen.

Umm FMIC in pretty much all the turbo RX's I have and have owned. The stock ram air that goes from under the hood to the air box actually does work... don't really know why I see so many people remove it
Old 08-26-09, 01:22 AM
  #3  
Senior Member

iTrader: (13)
 
1stgen8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DA HILLS OF VA
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I molded a camero hood scoop into the stock hood and made my own headlight cover using fiberglass. I placed the hood scoop over the turbo instead of in the center of the hood like the stock TII hoods. The headlight cover is not attached yet. I just laid it in place for you to see.....got a lot more sanding to do on the hood, fenders and headlight cover.
Attached Thumbnails Intake modifications(small and large)-000_0008.jpg  
Old 08-26-09, 05:09 AM
  #4  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
The stock system works just fine for a stock NA engine. Once you get into the 200hp range, then you would probably want to upgrade to something bigger. A standalone EMS will allow you to eliminate the AFM and use a shorter intake pipe, and you would want the EMS for better engine control anyway once you get into the high power range for a NA engine. You would probably also want to use individual throttle bodies at that point. The most efficient inlet is a "bell mouth" inlet, a submerged "NACA" duct is the best duct, and a "divergent duct" is required if you want ram air supercharging. You can search the "" terms on the internet. (Ignore search results that yield a "convergent-divergent" duct, as you do not want this).
Old 08-26-09, 04:48 PM
  #5  
Working on my car.

Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Eva001Ikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well thank you for the input, and for those of you who keep yammering on about the stock air intake system, I bought my car and the intake was already taken out and fucked up, so unless you can revert time or if you have all the stock components and are going to come to my house to install them dont nag about it.

Yes my car is n/a and it is almost at 200 whp here is the thread take a look:
https://www.rx7club.com/naturally-aspirated-performance-forum-220/my-91-n-coupe-its-nearly-200whp-856880/
Old 08-26-09, 05:13 PM
  #6  
Parts collector

iTrader: (4)
 
No_love_for_pistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 657
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Eva001Ikari
well thank you for the input, and for those of you who keep yammering on about the stock air intake system, I bought my car and the intake was already taken out and fucked up, so unless you can revert time or if you have all the stock components and are going to come to my house to install them dont nag about it.

Yes my car is n/a and it is almost at 200 whp here is the thread take a look:
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=856880
In fairness to the people who responded that there is nothing wrong with the stock intake, you never mentioned in your original post that you did not have it installed.... and were thus looking for an alternative.
Old 08-26-09, 05:53 PM
  #7  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by Eva001Ikari
well thank you for the input, and for those of you who keep yammering on about the stock air intake system, I bought my car and the intake was already taken out and fucked up, so unless you can revert time or if you have all the stock components and are going to come to my house to install them dont nag about it.

Yes my car is n/a and it is almost at 200 whp here is the thread take a look:
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=856880
Er, people only mentioned the stock intake because they were trying to save you time and money if you had a stock setup. No need to get all pissy at people who volunteered their time to help you and were not aware of the whole situation because you failed to supply certain details.
Old 08-26-09, 07:02 PM
  #8  
Like a G6

iTrader: (1)
 
Tofuman FC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: In the Dutch Mountains
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1stgen8
I molded a camero hood scoop into the stock hood and made my own headlight cover using fiberglass. I placed the hood scoop over the turbo instead of in the center of the hood like the stock TII hoods. The headlight cover is not attached yet. I just laid it in place for you to see.....got a lot more sanding to do on the hood, fenders and headlight cover.
The stock TII has the scoop over the IC, not the turbo. Looking from the front it should be on the right side.

Riz.
Old 08-26-09, 07:43 PM
  #9  
My job is to blow **** up

iTrader: (8)
 
lastphaseofthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: palmyra Indiana
Posts: 2,900
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i read your other thread, you need a cold air intake, either mount the filter under the headlight or make a box and for it. i've done both, and prefer the inside the finder mount, as you get much better results, but.. it gets really dirty really fast. but cold 30 degree aimbent mornings my NA s5, would chrip 3rd, i **** you not.
Old 08-26-09, 08:29 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

iTrader: (13)
 
1stgen8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DA HILLS OF VA
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tofuman FC3S
The stock TII has the scoop over the IC, not the turbo. Looking from the front it should be on the right side.

Riz.

Yeah, i know the stock TII hood scoop sits over the intercooler but since I'm running a FMIC and never had a TII hood I decided to place my scoop closer to the turbo.


"Looking from the front it should be on the right side"........
Old 08-26-09, 08:33 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

iTrader: (13)
 
1stgen8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DA HILLS OF VA
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Eva001Ikari
well thank you for the input, and for those of you who keep yammering on about the stock air intake system, I bought my car and the intake was already taken out and fucked up, so unless you can revert time or if you have all the stock components and are going to come to my house to install them dont nag about it.

Yes my car is n/a and it is almost at 200 whp here is the thread take a look:
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=856880

If you ever need the stock airbox parts (box, hose to intake, duct) I have everything except an extra MAF sensor. I will let you have it really cheap.
Old 08-26-09, 08:34 PM
  #12  
Working on my car.

Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Eva001Ikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look guys, I understand that for those of you giving me input about the stock system and thats all well and good but first, it isnt anyones choice but mine and on top of that, i'm not even asking what is better or anything even close. I want to see modified intakes, air boxes, ram airs, hood scoops, ducting and other stupid rediculous mods that ARE NOT the stock system. So as i am very sorry for snapping at those people trying to tell me how great the stock system is, i dont have one and i'm not getting one so dont post if thats what your post is about.
Old 08-26-09, 09:44 PM
  #13  
Cake or Death?

iTrader: (2)
 
clokker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,249
Received 63 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by Eva001Ikari
I want to see modified intakes, air boxes, ram airs, hood scoops, ducting and other stupid rediculous mods that ARE NOT the stock system.
OK then, here's mine.




Puts the filter in front of the rad so it draws ambient temp air, cleans up the bay a bit and has no water intake issues.
Can't say anything about power loss/gain from doing it but the only way my car would chirp the tires in third is if I ran over a parakeet.
Old 08-27-09, 01:57 AM
  #14  
Working on my car.

Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Eva001Ikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
clokker thats a nice set up, looks clean. So you had to relocate your coolant overflow tank. Since i dont have an air flow meter because of my haltech, i think i'm just going to put my air filter right off my throttle body and cut out a piece of my hood and get a small hood scoop and put right over it.

Oh yea, in case anyone is wondering my car was at 175 whp on the dyno before John opened up the hood and moved the intake pipe up over where the hood would be when its closed. Once he moved it, i got the 182.5
Old 08-27-09, 06:11 PM
  #15  
In the shade

 
EnjoiPugs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by clokker
OK then, here's mine.




Puts the filter in front of the rad so it draws ambient temp air, cleans up the bay a bit and has no water intake issues.
Can't say anything about power loss/gain from doing it but the only way my car would chirp the tires in third is if I ran over a parakeet.
hehe, this is what I was thinking about doing for my friend. I am keeping my stock setup until I go turbo. But, my pal already replaced his stock setup and I think this is a better one. BTW I really like that red UIM job you did. And nice engine bay, very clean car man. I can see the external mods, but did you do anything on the inside of the motor? Sorry if i'm heading away from the thread topic lol.
Old 08-27-09, 07:35 PM
  #16  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
rotaryracer1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is your intake manifold got that red wrinkle finish like a subie STI?
Old 08-27-09, 11:25 PM
  #17  
I

iTrader: (3)
 
Twins80s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: at home
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this is a large intake modification
Old 08-28-09, 12:25 AM
  #18  
Rotors still spinning

iTrader: (1)
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
I've been running around with a few different pressure taps in various places in the intake system with a magnehelic gauge that I move to various ports. I've been watching the pressure drop in the intake system. Specifically those from the air filter and also from the air flow meter. The results have been interesting.

The afm shows a steady 1/4 psi pressure drop at idle and then it stays steady as the rpms rise. To a point at least. I need to log it all better but somewhere after 5K the pressure drop from the afm really starts to climb. Yes it is a restriction. This is on a stock '90 GXL that I bought this year btw.

Why am I mentioning the afm as a restriction and how is it relevant? It's simply because there is a far larger pressure drop from in front of the afm to behind it than there is from before to after the stock paper air filter! I've tested it and still am. The stock intake system isn't really holding anyone back who is at stock power levels. It's not perfect by any means though and I'm sure once you hit 200 hp or so it starts to play a larger role.

A cone filter may technically be able to flow more in a static test but what something can do and what they actually are doing in practice aren't always the same thing. A cone would pick up hot engine bay air but then again the stock air box heat soaks pretty bad. You wouldn't think plastic would but it gets pretty hot in there. It can't be as hot as radiator air hitting the filter directly though.

My recommendation is to start where the biggest issues are first and that is on the exhaust. Worry about the intake later.
Old 08-28-09, 01:26 PM
  #19  
version 2.0

iTrader: (17)
 
texFCturboII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 3,590
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 1stgen8


"Looking from the front it should be on the right side"........
yes.
Old 09-01-09, 04:27 PM
  #20  
Working on my car.

Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Eva001Ikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my exhaust system is fine, i'm running racing beat true duals all the way back.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
astrum
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
24
11-15-17 08:44 AM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
28
04-14-16 12:58 PM



Quick Reply: Intake modifications(small and large)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 PM.