I'm not a photographer or web designer
#6
Goes *round*round*round*
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Fel
I crunched them from 1600x1200 to 640x480. Could that be why?
It is a cheap 2 megapixel camera too.
I crunched them from 1600x1200 to 640x480. Could that be why?
It is a cheap 2 megapixel camera too.
Yeah, when you decrease the intended size it increases the size of each pixel. When it does this you lose some detail, but in this case not much. The size says how many pixel for that certain picture and the smaller the number---> less pixels--->less detail.
#7
Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fel, don't feel bad, I started looking for that after reading posts were others had their wheels wrong. To be honest I don't even know which way they should be going, but I know enough that they should all be the same (glad I drive a vert with BBS wheels!)
Chuck
Chuck
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
10-17-20 03:25 PM
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
23
09-30-15 11:36 AM