2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Ideal Balance for AFM?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-04, 01:13 AM
  #51  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by WAYNE88N/A
"Many times a second" doesn't answer my earlier question, though. Can we assume that the rate of change displayed on the meter (or the pretty little LED's) during stoich is also the rate of change made to fuel flow during all other transient events? If so, then we're looking at about 4 or 5 times a second...
The ECU calculates fuel requirements once per engine cycle, so at 6000rpm it's technically changing the fuelling rate 100 times per second. It's the O2 sensor's reaction time that affects how quickly the closed loop cycle operates. The faster the the O2 sensor's output changes, the faster it'll cycle. 4-5 times per second is about normal in my experience, but more modern sensors are probably better.

Last edited by NZConvertible; 08-04-04 at 01:17 AM.
Old 08-04-04, 12:02 PM
  #52  
Lives on the Forum

 
WAYNE88N/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Coldspring TX
Posts: 5,721
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Hmmm, 100 hertz signal rate sounds kinda fishy...Let's assume a 3K cruise rpm; now, the CAS turns at half crank speed, correct? So 1500 rpm (25/sec) CAS input signals, all other fuel delivery related sensors (AFM, TPS, boost sensor, thermisters, etc..) are a straight DC voltage, no reference frequencies can be obtained from them, they have to be algorithmically mapped by the ECU before the results & fuel delivery outputs can be oscillated (or, switched to ground, if you prefer)...Now, at 3K, my primaries are doing something around a 22% duty cycle, which means no signal can be "delivered" (or changed) approx. 80% of the time. If we were to assume that the CAS signals "run the show", and that the injector pulsewidth can only actually be changed (compared to the previous pulse) when the coil is energized, we're looking at 25/.22, or 5.5 times per second (double this for 6K rpm, of course). Which, by the way, is almost exactly what the O2 sensor is showing me at 3K...
Old 08-04-04, 12:08 PM
  #53  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
OverDriven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WAYNE88N/A
Hmmm, 100 hertz signal rate sounds kinda fishy...Let's assume a 3K cruise rpm; now, the CAS turns at half crank speed, correct? So 1500 rpm (25/sec) CAS input signals, all other fuel delivery related sensors (AFM, TPS, boost sensor, thermisters, etc..) are a straight DC voltage, no reference frequencies can be obtained from them, they have to be algorithmically mapped by the ECU before the results & fuel delivery outputs can be oscillated (or, switched to ground, if you prefer)...Now, at 3K, my primaries are doing something around a 22% duty cycle, which means no signal can be "delivered" (or changed) approx. 80% of the time. If we were to assume that the CAS signals "run the show", and that the injector pulsewidth can only actually be changed (compared to the previous pulse) when the coil is energized, we're looking at 25/.22, or 5.5 times per second (double this for 6K rpm, of course). Which, by the way, is almost exactly what the O2 sensor is showing me at 3K...
Wow...I...ummm...my brain is about to explode.

-Joe
Old 08-05-04, 06:49 PM
  #54  
Drive to the unknown.

Thread Starter
 
Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
sooo.... that means theres a lot goin on... right got that... lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WANKfactor
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
6
09-29-15 01:14 PM



Quick Reply: Ideal Balance for AFM?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 AM.