2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Greddy Emanage + turbo-n/a questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-05 | 02:53 AM
  #1  
BklynRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
King of the Loop
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
Arrow Greddy Emanage + turbo-n/a questions

Hey guys im looking twords the emanage to control my turbo-n/a project and ive got a few questions that were either vague or unanswered in searches and on websites.

First of all what are the bare essentials I need to run/program the emanage. Like harnesses, software ect..

Im seeing alot of complains about the timing setup not working right on the emanage. If this is true does the emanage offer any useful features to make it better than the safcII or any other piggyback?

I have read a few times on this forum that the emanage will let me remove the afm and replace it with a mass airflow meter, but i dont see anything mentioned anywhere else. Is it true?

Overall would the emanage be worth the extra money over a safcII?
Old 09-19-05 | 12:39 AM
  #2  
djmtsu's Avatar
DGRRX
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 0
From: Murfreesboro TN
Originally Posted by BklynRX7
I have read a few times on this forum that the emanage will let me remove the afm and replace it with a mass airflow meter,
Those two things are essentially the same thing.

I think you meant to say replace the AFM with a MAP sensor (Manifold Air Pressure).
Old 09-19-05 | 12:42 AM
  #3  
iceblue's Avatar
Passing life by

 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 2
From: Scotland, USA
IIRC the E-manage will not ditch the AFM. Yes the E-Mange is bettor then the SAFC.

IMHO forget about the piggy back its a wasted effort for what will be a short term solution. Go get a Mega Squirt and be done with it, and it’s cheaper!
Old 09-19-05 | 01:36 AM
  #4  
BklynRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
King of the Loop
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
Arrow

Originally Posted by djmtsu
Those two things are essentially the same thing.

I think you meant to say replace the AFM with a MAP sensor (Manifold Air Pressure).
yea thats what i meant.

Anyway I would like to go megasquirt or another stand alone but I dont feel like learning 2 new things at the same time and adding another variable to any possible problems. Atleast with a piggyback there is already a base set.

If im not using the timing feature, exactly what makes the emanage better than a safcII?
Old 09-19-05 | 02:12 AM
  #5  
snub disphenoid's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
If you're using an E-manage (or is it the E-01???wtf whatever), there are add-ons that you can purchase seperately. if you want to change your car to a speed-density setup, then you should purchase the 3-bar MAP sensor upgrade package, which lets you ditch the AFM and tune your car based upon manifold absolute pressure, which is much better than tuning from throttle position. Yes, it's superior to the SAFC-II as long as you utilize it's full capabilities, but when you upgrade an e-manage to the point that you'll be reliably and safely controlling your engine, you're reaching the realm of $1000+, which is like Haltech/Microtech territory.
Old 09-19-05 | 02:20 AM
  #6  
snub disphenoid's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by BklynRX7
yea thats what i meant.

Anyway I would like to go megasquirt or another stand alone but I dont feel like learning 2 new things at the same time and adding another variable to any possible problems. Atleast with a piggyback there is already a base set.

If im not using the timing feature, exactly what makes the emanage better than a safcII?
To comment on this - your car will run poorly without something like standalone engine management. This isn't a 6-port motor with exhaust and intake, it's a turbocharged engine, which didn't have the engine control to even think about boost, so just running a fuel enrichment program on a stock ECU will not be your best bet. You might as well completely change out the ECU (i.e. standalone, not a reprogrammed unit). If you REALLY want to tune the car yourself, go to EFI University (yes, it really exists), where you can learn the tuning interface and begin to understand all of the ridiculous terms you'll find in, say, your Haltech tuning manual.

But honestly at this point, if you're not too good with tuning, I'd say pony up the extra cash for a professional tuner, your car will run better and make more power and get better gas mileage, etc. Tuning isn't like making a chart and magically everything falls into place, it's precise ****, a lot of people have popped their engines doing it. Also, it NEVER pays out in the long run to do anything that pertains to engine/fuel/ignition management on the cheap. Lots of people have blown their motors trying to use simple piggybacks like SAFC-IIs on boosted NAs, it's just not your best choice. I say, if you're spenging a few thousand to boost your motor, what's another 1500 to make it run perfect and make the most power?
Old 09-19-05 | 02:25 AM
  #7  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary

 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
For that price, why not just go with Megasquirt n' Spark? You can get it built, tested, and with a base map set up for a rotary application by someone for cheaper than a brand new e-manage.
Old 09-19-05 | 06:32 AM
  #8  
BklynRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
King of the Loop
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
Arrow

Originally Posted by dDuB
For that price, why not just go with Megasquirt n' Spark? You can get it built, tested, and with a base map set up for a rotary application by someone for cheaper than a brand new e-manage.
Where?
Old 09-19-05 | 09:10 AM
  #9  
Bukwild's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 1
From: DC Area
pm a guy with a user name of tofuball. He and his room mate makes them in his house
Old 09-19-05 | 01:49 PM
  #10  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary

 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by Bukwild
pm a guy with a user name of tofuball. He and his room mate makes them in his house
His roommate is muythaibxr, he's the one writing the ignition codes for rotaries and doing some amazing work.

I believe he told me they might be starting a business with building/setting up Megasquirts for people.
Old 11-22-05 | 06:42 PM
  #11  
car geek
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, NC
i know this is an old thread, but...

Ok, the Greddy Emanage ultimate does allow for air flow meter removal, it allows the use of a wide band o2 sensor, and i believe you can add a knock sensor. I have seen an Rx8 tuned for 350hp+ daily driven stock engine and a basic GReddy turbo kit. The Emanage is very very capable and controlling ignition is half the point, you can retard ignition as boost increases. In my mind its the way to go, its definately cheaper to go the Emanage route, but it is just as precise and capable as a megasquirt. Its also MUCH easier to hook up the Emanage, no new wiring harness!
Old 11-22-05 | 08:42 PM
  #12  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Originally Posted by dDuB
His roommate is muythaibxr, he's the one writing the ignition codes for rotaries and doing some amazing work.

I believe he told me they might be starting a business with building/setting up Megasquirts for people.
And ship it back and forth a few times for good measure.

(sorry, I HAD to do it!)
Old 11-22-05 | 08:47 PM
  #13  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary

 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
And ship it back and forth a few times for good measure.

(sorry, I HAD to do it!)
Not his fault he was given some faulty information from other MS builders really. Now that he knows why and what were causing the issue he knows what to test for.

Plus he's going to fully test them before sending anything out with the new plug-n-play ones he's building in the stock ECU case that will plug into the stock harness. All you have to do is plug it in and you're ready to go.
Old 11-22-05 | 09:46 PM
  #14  
Chief's Avatar
rotary adrenaline.

 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: West Atlanta, GA
no emanage ultimate. it fakes the AFM output to 'delete' it. so you have to set up a whole map for it to fake.
Old 11-23-05 | 03:50 PM
  #15  
Z3r0's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton Alberta
I actually am running a n/a+turbo with emanage, its going ok so far but I haven't gotten it on a dyno to tune it yet. I have also had an safc II on the same setup and from my experience I would say that the emanage is a better buy depending on how cheap you can get it for. Also the emanage ultimate has some new options and the afm deletion works like who Chief described. I was able to find cheaper harnesses and such and got the ignition/injection harnesses for 30 or 40 cnd I think. As for the pressure sensor you can use a GM sensor which is cheaper than the greddy one (which I kind of regret getting). As far as the bare essentials, you can just get the main unit and download the software and get a 'clone' usb cable. Its working out for me decently so far, and I plan to make use of the built in additional injector controller so it all works out ^_^. Honeslty though, if I had the money I'd probably have went stand alone... but its a bit more troublesome to setup.
Old 11-24-05 | 01:18 PM
  #16  
The Wankler's Avatar
FKITALL
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 2
From: Dublin Ca.
One main reason I went with the Ultamite is because of California smog laws. You can hide it well, and you dont have to get rid of the "rats nest". I have yet to hook it up, however I am sure I will be pleased.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ian_D
Single Turbo RX-7's
25
10-14-15 01:31 PM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
09-11-15 01:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 PM.