2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

General HP question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-16, 07:39 PM
  #26  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by rx7b13
None taken, I've driven in Autox many times in the past, just not with this setup.
Yeah, a turbocharged car is different in that it has the added factor of taking into account the boost profile.

There is no turbo boost without lag. Centrifugal compressors increase their output at the square of their shaft speed. Therefore, there is more lag at lower rpm than at higher rpm, so the easy way to make lag less of a factor is to avoid the lower rpm range when racing the car. Also, throttle response is not significantly affected by the turbo, so the engine will change rpm at about the same rate as it would if it were not boosted. The least amount of lag is accomplished by removing the turbo and running the engine NA.

In a high-horsepower application, turbo lag isn't such a bad thing because there would be traction problems if all the power were applied instantly.

Originally Posted by rx7b13
I know the higher you go with the A/R the longer it takes for the turbo to spool.
The turbine A/R is relative to the turbo, so you can't really use the A/R to compare different turbos to each other. Given the same turbo, a smaller turbine A/R will initially spool the turbo faster, while a larger turbine A/R will spool the turbo better at higher rpm.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LargeOrangeFont
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
50
02-11-19 03:37 PM
chris1994rx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
03-05-16 07:21 PM
Valkyrie
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
8
02-22-16 12:29 AM



Quick Reply: General HP question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 AM.