2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Garret T04BR??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-10, 05:57 PM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Amemiya -san's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Diego/ North Park
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Garret T04BR??

So is it my understanding that I can convert my stock '89 Turbo II to run a Garret T04BR ball bearing center. i feel as though I may be missing something. Any thing else involved in just the turbo. Not talking about the engine at all, though any suggestions on that would be greatly appreciated.
Old 07-02-10, 06:35 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
alex91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: lynnwood, WA
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
U might wana post this in the single turbo section, u will probabaly get more answers
Old 07-02-10, 06:39 PM
  #3  
89FC
 
-Crash-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Cali.
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
look up BNR turbo thats pretty much what they do.
Old 07-02-10, 07:14 PM
  #4  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
there is no way to convert the stock turbo to utilize a ball bearing CHRA that i know of. youre talking about swapping the whole CHRA(center housing rotating assembly) with the garrett unit which is kind of pointless since you will still be limited by the rather tiny stock turbine housing. you would be better going with a standard T4 flange turbo versus trying to blow through the straw that is the stock turbine housing.
Old 07-02-10, 07:50 PM
  #5  
Displacement Replacement

iTrader: (5)
 
FC3Sdrift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: St. Thomas
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my jdm hybrid is garrett turbo crammed into the stock S5 housing, has oil cooled only center section. I dynoed 361whp 309 ft-lbs, 12.1@116mph

i have to pull the housings off to measure the comp and turbine size
Old 07-03-10, 12:55 AM
  #6  
Turn up the boost
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 7,067
Received 91 Likes on 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Karack
there is no way to convert the stock turbo to utilize a ball bearing CHRA that i know of. youre talking about swapping the whole CHRA(center housing rotating assembly) with the garrett unit which is kind of pointless since you will still be limited by the rather tiny stock turbine housing. you would be better going with a standard T4 flange turbo versus trying to blow through the straw that is the stock turbine housing.
Ditto. You will also need a lot of supporting mods; ecu, fuel, intercooler, clutch etc..
Old 07-03-10, 01:32 PM
  #7  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Amemiya -san's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Diego/ North Park
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FC3Sdrift
my jdm hybrid is garrett turbo crammed into the stock S5 housing, has oil cooled only center section. I dynoed 361whp 309 ft-lbs, 12.1@116mph

i have to pull the housings off to measure the comp and turbine size
Yes yes yes, this is what I was after!!!! How much boost were you running? Please give me more information!!!!! Those numbers are great for what it is!!! How does it drive? Oh yea what exact internals?? thanks a million!!
Old 07-04-10, 11:13 AM
  #8  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
way to ignore the suggestions to avoid wasting money on a VERY expensive hybrid mod turbo that will still be very limited. if you're gonna mod the stock turbo then just forget the BB CHRA aspect and live with a little lag until the time is to go with a real upgrade turbo. people have gone over 400WHP on non ball bearing hybrid turbos but the turbos just don't last and are less than optimal because of the turbine housing being the limiting factor(yep smaller turbines help spool which in turn also makes the ball bearing center more of a waste of time and money, they also limit the output of the turbo severely and it also becomes very difficult to control boost with the internal wastegate).
Old 07-06-10, 02:26 PM
  #9  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Amemiya -san's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Diego/ North Park
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Karack
way to ignore the suggestions to avoid wasting money on a VERY expensive hybrid mod turbo that will still be very limited. if you're gonna mod the stock turbo then just forget the BB CHRA aspect and live with a little lag until the time is to go with a real upgrade turbo. people have gone over 400WHP on non ball bearing hybrid turbos but the turbos just don't last and are less than optimal because of the turbine housing being the limiting factor(yep smaller turbines help spool which in turn also makes the ball bearing center more of a waste of time and money, they also limit the output of the turbo severely and it also becomes very difficult to control boost with the internal wastegate).
Thanks man!!! Most def! It really does make more sense to go w/ a real ball bearing unit rather than retrofitting the stocker.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dradon03
Single Turbo RX-7's
8
09-18-15 05:57 AM
jjandros
Single Turbo RX-7's
17
08-28-15 08:01 PM



Quick Reply: Garret T04BR??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM.