The final let down for the n/a FC (dyno)
#26
I came, I saw, I boosted.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by von
Well the reason why he has leaned it so much up top is most likely from the T11 fuel pump iim sure. And the Mild street port im sure doesent help either.
Well the reason why he has leaned it so much up top is most likely from the T11 fuel pump iim sure. And the Mild street port im sure doesent help either.
Putting in a TII pump (unlike some other aftermarket ones with higher psi) won't make your car run any richer.
The porting does change things though... the way the stock AFM's are, and the way the ECU interperets the signal, is such that when they are flowing more air, the ecu overcompensates with too much fuel, because it's outside where it was designed and programmed to run effeciantly.
The more flow, the higher the overcompensation.
#28
After talking a bit with Rob, me putting down around 170rwhp is good. He also said with more miles the motor will make more and more power. But not to much more. He says that i should'nt expect more than about 200flywheel hp from a engine with a stock idle, and pass emmisions.
We also talked about exaust. He seems to think that the 2- 2" mandral bent exaust is the way to go. He's told me in the past that peripheral engines don't like a long collected exaust. If you have to run a long system on a p.p. motor, best results where with duel exaust. The same (not nearly as noticable though) goes for my 90 n/a engine, that it would make more in the mid to upper rpm range with the duel vs collected, as the scavaging effect is very important.
So in conclusion, i'm going to stick with my duel 2" exaust, be happy with what power i have....and weight for the motor to pop....then add a little more port to it.
I'm still going to post the dyno results...but i have to borrow my brouther in laws camera to do it. SO please be patient.
CJ
We also talked about exaust. He seems to think that the 2- 2" mandral bent exaust is the way to go. He's told me in the past that peripheral engines don't like a long collected exaust. If you have to run a long system on a p.p. motor, best results where with duel exaust. The same (not nearly as noticable though) goes for my 90 n/a engine, that it would make more in the mid to upper rpm range with the duel vs collected, as the scavaging effect is very important.
So in conclusion, i'm going to stick with my duel 2" exaust, be happy with what power i have....and weight for the motor to pop....then add a little more port to it.
I'm still going to post the dyno results...but i have to borrow my brouther in laws camera to do it. SO please be patient.
CJ
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 07:06 PM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
09-09-15 05:24 PM