2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Fake NO2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-04 | 05:59 PM
  #1  
Mint87RX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: chicago land
Question Fake NO2

Me and a friend are having a debate and i wanted to ask on here to see if anyone knows some info i could use. My idea is to put an oxygen tank in my car and feed it into the intake. normal air is like 25% O2 and i was planning on just running a line to the intake tube to run a small amount of O2 to mix with the air to make way more combustion. My question is would this work or just detonate the engine. anyone that has some real knowledge of the physics of this please post some answers, if it works it would meen huge HP.
Old 02-04-04 | 06:06 PM
  #2  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
(edit...remove misinformation)

I wouldn't do it. But have fun with that fire if you set that bad boy up. Besides you would need fuel to match that extra O2 if it got into the engine without going boom.


Santiago

Last edited by Aaron Cake; 02-07-04 at 12:11 PM.
Old 02-04-04 | 06:27 PM
  #3  
Rizla+'s Avatar
Full Member

 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Could work, but you would have to figure out a way to calculate the amount of Oxygen you are injecting and compensate for fuel. But it could not be sprayed like nitrous because oxygen as very high combustion temps and would up your EGT waayyy too much, that is why we use Nitrous Oxide, when the N separate from O it use a lot of energy, which is taken in form of heat, reducing the combustion chamber temperature. Welll, that's how it was eplained to me.
Old 02-04-04 | 06:28 PM
  #4  
Mint87RX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: chicago land
isnt NO2 extremely flammable too? i would be running larger pump to compensate for O2
Old 02-04-04 | 06:29 PM
  #5  
AcidShock's Avatar
Eet fase
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, SC USA
By the way... it is N2O.
Old 02-04-04 | 06:29 PM
  #6  
Liquid Anarchy's Avatar
We come with the Hardcore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
too much mean for 1 post

Last edited by Liquid Anarchy; 02-04-04 at 06:32 PM.
Old 02-04-04 | 06:29 PM
  #7  
Liquid Anarchy's Avatar
We come with the Hardcore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
no and no.

The N in N2O is what makes it safe. Long story short... stop talking.
Old 02-04-04 | 06:32 PM
  #8  
Templeswain's Avatar
Senior Member

 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: New Idaho
Yeah, you use oxygen, and you'll make it exceptionally hot. You'll probably blow the motor up before you notice any performance upgrade. Cutting torches use acetylene and oxygen together cut through metal. Acetelyn burns realy hot....But when you kick in the oxygen you make it reall really hot.
Old 02-04-04 | 06:32 PM
  #9  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
Originally posted by Mint87RX7
isnt NO2 extremely flammable too? i would be running larger pump to compensate for O2

99% of the **** you saw in FnF isn't true. NAAUWS doesn't blow up. The bottles would have burst yes but the car wouldsn't just burst into flames and jump 10 feet into the air.
Old 02-04-04 | 06:36 PM
  #10  
jreynish's Avatar
New Project on the Way...
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 5
From: Yellowknife, NT
N20 Is explosive under pressure! so It could blow up if expose to high heat under pressure!
O2 is explosive easily... and you would not be able to control the fine amount of 02 you are injecting it would be super hard.
You will need more than just an fuel pump... Trust me! You need to read up on this alot more... there is tons of information on it just do a search!
Old 02-04-04 | 06:37 PM
  #11  
Mint87RX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: chicago land
If i was to only increase the amount of O2 in the air by only like 5% it seams like it would still be just as stable but more combustable
Old 02-04-04 | 06:39 PM
  #12  
Senior Member

 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Well the bottles would burst because of the high pressure that they are under. Also, the nitrogen in N2O provides cooling. Don't cheap out you will probably blow your motor and yourself up. There is a reason people don't inject pure oxygen into their engines .
Old 02-04-04 | 06:45 PM
  #13  
Mint87RX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: chicago land
i dont understand why the bottles would burst, normal oxygen tanks dont just sudenly explode. maybe if you could get a tank filled with 30% O2 like old people get to breathe
Old 02-04-04 | 06:45 PM
  #14  
Templeswain's Avatar
Senior Member

 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: New Idaho
Originally posted by Mint87RX7
If i was to only increase the amount of O2 in the air by only like 5% it seams like it would still be just as stable but more combustable
Well then you need to do some hard core math. You have the idea so now get the figures for it.

You'll have to find the ration of air to fuel your car currently consumes. Then, find out what a %5 percent increase actually is per unit volume of space at your atmospheric pressure. And what amount of fuel would have to be increased for every unit of oxygen consumed at that %5....And a whole bunch of other technical mumbo.

Sure it might be stable. Sure it might be more "combustable".....but your idea of "more" might be turn out to be .00000000000000000000001% increase in power.

I thought about how to shove something/anything into the intake to increase hp too. We all have at one point or another. But chances are, someone already learned this curve for you.

But its good to think about it, even if it doesn't work.....

Last edited by Templeswain; 02-04-04 at 06:49 PM.
Old 02-04-04 | 06:52 PM
  #15  
Digi7ech's Avatar
I break Diff mounts
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 4
From: Avondale, Arizona
The Nitrous works because the Nitrogen molecules act as a transport method to get the explosive/combustable oxygen to the chamber without premature detonation.

Heat and pressure makes Nitrous combust/break apart into nitrogen and oxygen

The reason why people use nitrous is 2 answers.
The nitrogen and oxygen seperation creates a cooling effect helping reduce intake temps.
Cooler air temp == more hp.

Then there's adding more oxygen into the chamber.

You add more fuel because your adding more oxygen.

Blah blah blah. I'm not a pro at this. If I'm wrong feel free to point it out.

Last edited by Digi7ech; 02-04-04 at 07:00 PM.
Old 02-04-04 | 07:00 PM
  #16  
jreynish's Avatar
New Project on the Way...
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 5
From: Yellowknife, NT
Your WRONG... lol.... Just joking...
What Digi7ech said is short but entirely true... the reason n20 is used is because it is stable enough to be transported safely and under the "right" conditions breaks apparts to add more oxygen to then engine. by "right" i mean compression and heat! Trust me when I say it is smarter and probably no more expensive that what you were looking at for the pure 02 idea!
Old 02-04-04 | 07:03 PM
  #17  
Mint87RX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: chicago land
i am not necisarily talking about this because i am to cheap to run n2o, i was just curious as to whether or not it would work. Just seeing the oppinions of others
Old 02-04-04 | 07:04 PM
  #18  
jreynish's Avatar
New Project on the Way...
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 5
From: Yellowknife, NT
In Theroy under the right conditions... Yes it would work... howerver there are soo many unknowns... that it would not be as safe!
Old 02-04-04 | 07:42 PM
  #19  
Mint87RX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: chicago land
i think my real concern is that if it did ignite in the intake i think the flame could travel through the O2 line since its full of oxygen and blow the tank, thats why i was thinking of having a tank with a slightly higher O2 enrichment than normal air but enough to increase the intake O2 by 5%
Old 02-04-04 | 08:11 PM
  #20  
ilike2eatricers's Avatar
I R SAD PANDA W/O BAW
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 1
From: bay area
You would need a one way check valve.

Right now I'm taking a welding class and doing oxy acetalyne cutting. Oxygen itself is not flammable that is why we must turn on the acetalyne first and ignite then add the oxygen. The oxygen tank itself is under very high pressure and could explode if too much vibration occurs or it is struck.

EDIT: Should mention it is still possible for the flame to travel up the line but a one way check valve will help to slow it down until it burns throught the valve and onto the bottle.

Last edited by ilike2eatricers; 02-04-04 at 08:31 PM.
Old 02-05-04 | 01:36 AM
  #21  
I wish I was driving!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by jreynish
N20 Is explosive under pressure! so It could blow up if expose to high heat under pressure!
Ummm... no. Explosions occur during combustion of a material.
N2O does not contain any carbon atoms, and thus cannot combust itself.

Instead, under high heat, it splits into nitrogen and oxygen atoms, two elements found commonly in air. Air in itself is not explosive, so why would nitrous oxide be?


Nitrous bottle "explosions" occur when nitrous oxide gas pressure inside the bottle exceed the safe containment pressures of the bottle. This holds true for any gas, but this does not any gas is explosive...
Old 02-05-04 | 01:40 AM
  #22  
I wish I was driving!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by Rizla+
Could work, but you would have to figure out a way to calculate the amount of Oxygen you are injecting and compensate for fuel. But it could not be sprayed like nitrous because oxygen as very high combustion temps and would up your EGT waayyy too much, that is why we use Nitrous Oxide, when the N separate from O it use a lot of energy, which is taken in form of heat, reducing the combustion chamber temperature. Welll, that's how it was eplained to me.
Completely wrong.
The change in gas pressures creates a cooling effect of the air charge according to the ideal gas law.

The nitrogen atoms are for buffering the combustion process so that the mixture does not detonate.
Old 02-05-04 | 01:41 AM
  #23  
I wish I was driving!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by Mint87RX7
isnt NO2 extremely flammable too? i would be running larger pump to compensate for O2
It is not flammable at all.
Old 02-05-04 | 01:43 AM
  #24  
I wish I was driving!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by Mint87RX7
i am not necisarily talking about this because i am to cheap to run n2o, i was just curious as to whether or not it would work. Just seeing the oppinions of others
It would not work.
Old 02-05-04 | 11:56 AM
  #25  
zjbarra's Avatar
Rotodeus
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
From: Gresham, OR
O2 tends to burn much faster. The O2 in air aids the combustion cycle but isn't itself able to catch on fire. I'm not sure here, it is just kind of an idea, but I think that when you stick in a bunch of straight O2 in your combustion cycle, it might be possible for the air mixture to actually catch on fire before the fuel sense straight O2 is extremely flamable. NO2 requires massive amounts of heat to break down the compound so I think it is more progressive in it's conversion to release oxygen. It could also just cause the fuel to burn too fast because there is too much oxygen available when it sparks. This is all speculation but it would explain why no one does it/we don't see it. It would cost a bit more too I think.

If anyone knows a scientific reason why this would be wrong, please share it. Don't just say you're wrong if you don't think it's right.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.