2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Engine running with no AFM?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-05, 08:38 PM
  #1  
Do a barrel roll!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rxmfn7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lower Burrell, PA
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Engine running with no AFM?

Today while putting everything back together from removing my front cover, I got a little over-anxious to see if it would fire back up ( if I had the timing on, check for any oil/coolant leaks, etc..) and I started the car without the AFM on. The car started, idled, and reved. Although it idles and revved very poorly, spuddering, etc.. it did hold an idle on its own, and did rev. Now this is my 1st S5 car, so it may be different, but I know none of my other S4s would even start with the AFM not plugged in. I thought the ECU used the AFM position to trigger the injectors..
Old 01-17-05, 08:59 PM
  #2  
Rabbit hole specialist

iTrader: (11)
 
JerryLH3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,825
Received 212 Likes on 130 Posts
I accidentally left the AFM unplugged on my old S5 N/A once before. It idled like crap and the check engine light came on. I quickly realized my error.

So, yes, they can start with the AFM disconnected.
Old 01-17-05, 09:01 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
WolfsRx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Palmerston North, NZ
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My GTU would crank and idle without getting an AFM signal but after driving a distance I would have to keep light pressure on the gas to keep her running as she would not hold her idle.
Old 01-17-05, 09:01 PM
  #4  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
if the AFM is left disconnected it has a fail safe setting in the ECU to allow it to idle and rev up a few K to possibly drive the vehicle, but if you rev it too high it loses power and dies. this is a built in limp mode for the ECU.
Old 01-17-05, 10:02 PM
  #5  
BOOSTED Vert

 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that must be only for the s5, I know on the s4's that **** wont even run...
Old 01-17-05, 10:08 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
RoTa7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes wen i had a GTUs i forgot to plug in the afm and it idled like crap and hellah smoke came out of the exhaust
Old 01-17-05, 10:16 PM
  #7  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Rxmfn7
I thought the ECU used the AFM position to trigger the injectors..
No, the CAS tells the ECU when to open the injectors; the AFM is used to calucate how long to open them for.
Old 01-18-05, 01:27 AM
  #8  
Rotary Freak

 
Syonyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The biggest difference between the S4 and S5 that I can see causing this is the addition of a full range TPS.

On the S4, once the TPS has gone wide open, the ECU really has no way of telling what the engine's doing. It could use the manifold pressure sensor combined with the engine RPM (FD style), but if it had the ability to do that, why use an AFM in the first place?

With the S5, the full range TPS could be used to approximate AFM values (through some sort of conversion function). It won't be *good*, and will fall apart at higher power output, but in a low power range it's obviously good enough to keep the engine running.

-=Russ=-
Old 01-18-05, 01:44 AM
  #9  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Doesn't the ECU control the fuel pump relay on the s5, and on the s4 it's the switch in the AFM? IIRC that's why a s4 would never start is because the fuel pump would only run during cranking and then stop.
Old 01-18-05, 02:39 AM
  #10  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
I think you've hit the nail on the head there Rat.
Old 01-18-05, 02:41 AM
  #11  
Rotary Freak

 
Syonyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
... yea, and that minor issue of "fuel flow."

What happens if you jumper the fuel pump test connector & try to start a S4 without an AFM?

I'm going to have to try that tomorrow.

-=Russ=-
Old 01-18-05, 03:59 AM
  #12  
Do a barrel roll!

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rxmfn7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lower Burrell, PA
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
Doesn't the ECU control the fuel pump relay on the s5, and on the s4 it's the switch in the AFM? IIRC that's why a s4 would never start is because the fuel pump would only run during cranking and then stop.
Thats what I was trying to say on my 1st post...I know on my S4s if you held the afm closed it would get no fuel and not start, it needed the engine vacuum to pull open the flap.
Old 01-18-05, 05:35 AM
  #13  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
I found some info on how Toyota ECU's control the fuel pump, and it would be a logical assumption that the S5 ECU does this the same way.

Instead of using a switch in the AFM, the fuel pump relay (aka circuit opening relay) is controlled directly by the ECU instead. It closes the relay any time it receives a cranking signal from the ignition key or there is an "Ne" signal coming from the CAS, indicating the engine is turning. If the engine stops turning, the signal from the CAS stops and the ECU opens the circuit opening relay, killing the pump.

It seems the S5 ECU can run the engine poorly at low load without an airflow signal. The same is probably true for S4's, if you jumpered the fuel pump check connector to bypass the AFM safety switch.

Last edited by NZConvertible; 01-18-05 at 05:40 AM.
Old 01-18-05, 09:38 AM
  #14  
Couldn't stay away

iTrader: (5)
 
F1blueRx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Defuniak Springs, FL
Posts: 5,080
Received 145 Likes on 78 Posts
Originally Posted by Syonyk
... yea, and that minor issue of "fuel flow."

What happens if you jumper the fuel pump test connector & try to start a S4 without an AFM?

I'm going to have to try that tomorrow.

-=Russ=-
It'll flood, I tried this while troubleshooting some issues with my stock wiring harness.
Old 01-18-05, 01:57 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

 
ra ra rotory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: "You take my car, I take your knee caps"
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you start an S5 with the afm unplugged; it will crap out at about 3k, and it will throw up the check engine light..
Old 01-18-05, 02:34 PM
  #16  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
my s4 would start with the AFM unplugged but would dump out at about 3k RPMs, started it a few times until i realized i left the AFM unplugged.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
mazdaverx713b
Build Threads
48
04-21-16 06:45 AM
befarrer
Microtech
3
08-22-15 05:52 PM
eddierotary
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
4
08-16-15 04:12 PM



Quick Reply: Engine running with no AFM?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 AM.