2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Confusion about compression normalization

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-12, 05:30 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Brigdh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Confusion about compression normalization

I just ran a compression test with a borrowed TR-01 on my S5 TII and came to two different normalization numbers. Would someone please help me figure out what I did wrong?

For the front rotor, my raw numbers were 81 - 83 - 81 at 273 rpm. I'm at 5430 ft above sea level.

According to the compression calculator at foxed.ca, my normalized numbers are 62.07 - 63.60 - 62.07

Running the calculations by hand, I got 94.225 - 96.225 - 94.225

So, clearly one of the results is wrong.

How I figured it out by hand (so someone can point out my mistake):

Looking at the graph on C-7 for RPM compensation, it looks like at 280 rpm, an 85 psi normalized will actually register as 92.5. So, for every RPM over 250, I should subtract 0.25 psi (7.5 psi gain / 30 rpm gain), or 5.75 psi for my 273 RPM.

That brings my RPM adjusted numbers to 75.25 - 77.25 - 75.25

Now to adjust for altitude. The next graph indicates that an 85 at sea level will register a 71 at 4000 ft above sea level. That comes to a 0.0035 psi drop per foot above sea level. So I added 19.005 psi (0.0035 psi loss per ft alt * 5430 alt).

My final numbers are 94.225 - 96.225 - 94.225 which are about 30psi better than the online calculator.

Since that is the difference between a great engine, and one that needs a rebuild soon, did I screw up my calculations?

Last edited by Brigdh; 01-29-12 at 05:40 PM.
Old 01-29-12, 06:54 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Brigdh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
After looking things over trying to figure out what was wrong, I ran the numbers through the online calculator again and got a more reasonable 96.82 - 99.21 - 96.82

I must have typed something wrong in the first time to get the low numbers. So, yeah. Clearly user error
Old 01-29-12, 10:44 PM
  #3  
Retired Moderator, RIP

iTrader: (142)
 
misterstyx69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Smiths Falls.(near Ottawa!.Mapquest IT!)
Posts: 25,581
Likes: 0
Received 131 Likes on 114 Posts
I calculate that you are just "calculating" too much!
With Numbers like that I would be signing off the internet and heading out to drive the **** out of the car!.They are Fine!
Old 01-29-12, 11:31 PM
  #4  
This sh*t burns oil!

iTrader: (7)
 
SpikeDerailed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC - USA
Posts: 1,239
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Are rotarys not hard to start up there?
Old 01-30-12, 12:03 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Brigdh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Once and a while I've had a hot start flooding issue. Never had any cold start issues.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
R.O.D
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
34
01-06-16 12:09 AM
risingsunroof82
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
09-09-15 08:06 PM
ZaqAtaq
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
09-05-15 08:57 PM
doritoloco
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
09-05-15 12:41 PM



Quick Reply: Confusion about compression normalization



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 PM.