2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Cone CAI vs stock box w/K&N

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-06, 01:14 PM
  #26  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you aren't confusing. however....... you are confused.

cooler air + better flow = more power
basic theory? nah, more like basic fact!
Old 09-25-06, 09:22 AM
  #27  
male stripper

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by sniperstevedave
Wups, just noticed there are two pages now. Meant that the extra holes in air box was a new suggestion. Still don't know that it would work though.

Please believe me, I do understand that cooler air+less flow restriction=better. This is basic theory. But theory often doesn't jive with practice. We have seen some evidence that the filter element itself makes very little difference, but we have been unable to seperate the effects from colder air intake from that of less restriction on flow. And we still don't have any quantitative evidence for the performance gains they are claimed to give. It is possible that the gain is so small as to not be worth the cost of the extra component and the time it takes to install them. Does this make since or am I just being confusing? Let me know and I will clarify.
you are partially correct. however this isn't theory but fact. the problem lies in assumption. people assume that just because of a few internet articles that in performing mod "b", it will work as they have been told. then they spit out said internet article in verbatum when questioned. yet they don't have any actual backing of their assumption. there have been a few talk of pressure drops which would be helpful, but still no actual numbers.

anywho, i have almost completed my cai. hopefully i will be able to hit the dyno here in a bit and test the stock box w/ K&N drop in, K&N cone, and it plus the cai box after heatsoaking the engine bay.
Old 09-25-06, 09:53 AM
  #28  
Dork

 
sniperstevedave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hurray! Finally.

I think my use of the word 'theory' might be a little different from some of you. It is like a theory in mathematics: so long as all the conditionals are true, the statement will be valid. I said theory because we really don't know that the conditions are being met; i.e. we are actually getting cooler air and less restriction. If we are, then yes, of course we will get a power gain. But making the assumption that one achieves these ends just by making a couple of mods is foolish. You actually have to test it- either by measuring the density of the intake air and the pressure differential from flow restriction, or by measuring power before and after which is easier and more usefull.

I can't wait to hear what you find out.

Last edited by sniperstevedave; 09-25-06 at 09:58 AM.
Old 12-20-06, 05:28 PM
  #29  
whats going on?

iTrader: (1)
 
SirCygnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: atlanta ga
Posts: 4,929
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
the snorkel i believe is the actual problematic portion.

imma make a naca duct that will force air directly into the element. its going to be in the hood. not the headlight.
Old 12-22-06, 12:42 PM
  #30  
Tear you apart

iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,882
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
I can't beleive this is being argued.

Cold air and more air = better.
Old 12-22-06, 12:50 PM
  #31  
#FakeCarEnthusaist

iTrader: (10)
 
Brody8877's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,814
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Great Not this debate again.... CAI > Intake boxes or Cold Intake boxes > Short Ram > Drop in filter
but since the FC dont have CAI made any more so all it is drop in filters. No matter what all suffer heatsoak but the CAI
Old 12-22-06, 12:52 PM
  #32  
What's the point??

iTrader: (6)
 
papiogxl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jager
I can't beleive this is being argued.

Cold air and more air = better.


EXACTLY! the box was unfinished it the pic by the way. Also, I run a standalone, so no AFM for me.
Old 12-22-06, 01:11 PM
  #33  
Winter sucks

 
micah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newberg, Oregon
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anybody thought of putting a hood scoop (discreet) in the hood section just above the air-box? And then doing a CAI chamber that seals to the hood? Would be a great ram-air setup.... I'm sure you'd still get heat-soaking a little bit, but with enough insulation on the engine bay, you could limit that considerably..

Just an idea... Might look cool too.
Old 12-26-06, 11:17 PM
  #34  
whats going on?

iTrader: (1)
 
SirCygnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: atlanta ga
Posts: 4,929
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by micaheli
Has anybody thought of putting a hood scoop (discreet) in the hood section just above the air-box? And then doing a CAI chamber that seals to the hood? Would be a great ram-air setup.... I'm sure you'd still get heat-soaking a little bit, but with enough insulation on the engine bay, you could limit that considerably..

Just an idea... Might look cool too.
thats what im gonna do. imma also add a drop in thinga ma bober or put some bod filler or somethin in the stock box's lower portion to make flow a tad bit better.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
03-28-17 03:30 PM
The Shaolin
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
09-14-15 07:50 PM
JIMMY54
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
08-12-15 05:40 PM



Quick Reply: Cone CAI vs stock box w/K&N



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 AM.