2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

brake pedal sooooo soft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-13, 10:35 PM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
ben.farnath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: new zealand
Posts: 804
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
brake pedal sooooo soft

So I've bled them over and over and over. Resleeved master and some new lines. Master was bench bled. With the car off the pedal is firm and feels like a pedal should. As soon as you turn on the car the pedal goes soft as hell. But the brakes work strong as you just have to be super touchy when pressing them. (as in, through the whole soft sloppy pedal feel the brakes do work and work strongly) and I've adjusted the pedal as per haynes specs.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using RX7Club
Old 03-30-13, 09:16 AM
  #2  
Cake or Death?

iTrader: (2)
 
clokker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,249
Received 63 Likes on 53 Posts
The behaviour you describe (pedal goes soft when car is started) is completely normal for a boosted system (brake boost, not turbocharged boost).
We'll assume that the system is mechanically sound and you've bled it properly.

That leaves the "feel" which is entirely subjective.
When I still had a stock brake system, several people complained of "soft" brakes and I've concluded that "feel" was completely intentional, just the way the engineers and test drivers wanted it.
IMO, the FC has woefully undersized master cylinders and boosters- especially if you've converted your base NA from single to four piston calipers.

A smaller MC requires less effort but more travel.
I cannot claim (simply because I never objectively tested it) that a larger MC/booster decreases actual braking distance but it certainly has an immediate and dramatic effect on the way the pedal "feels"...much shorter throw and harder response.

IF the system is bled, IF all the adjustments are correct (particularly the pedal>pushrod adjustment) and IF the mechanicals are sound, then changing the MC/booster is the next step to altering the pedal "feel".

Honda, Nissan, Subaru and even Mazda all have brake setups that are mostly plug-n-play into a FC.
Old 03-30-13, 09:48 AM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
mbonner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Onanole, Manitoba Canada
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MB

Clokker, does that mean the the 88 vert which comes with 4 pot calipers has a larger MC/booster?
Old 03-30-13, 10:02 AM
  #4  
Cake or Death?

iTrader: (2)
 
clokker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,249
Received 63 Likes on 53 Posts
Yup.
The stock NA setup is a single diaphragm booster with a 7/8" MC.
Turbos (and verts, I think) came with double diaphragm boosters with a 15/16" MC.

IMO, optimal size for the MC is either 1" or 1 1/16".
Old 03-30-13, 10:08 AM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
mbonner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Onanole, Manitoba Canada
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How difficult is it to switch to a larger MC on the vert, Clokker?
Old 03-30-13, 10:21 AM
  #6  
Cake or Death?

iTrader: (2)
 
clokker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,249
Received 63 Likes on 53 Posts
Not difficult at all.

I prefer to match my MCs with their original boosters because it eliminates the booster pushrod>MC adjustment.
Something like the Subaru 1 1/16" setup is a direct bolt in, no mods required.
"No mods required" does NOT include the brake lines, they will probably need some reconfig, if not outright replacement, to fit the prop valve.

The FC uses a 10mm input shaft on the booster and our pedal clevis is fairly unique (our cast alloy pedals are wider than standard steel pedal shafts). The Subaru uses the same shaft and our clevis will screw right on.
Other candidates may have an 8mm shaft and the clevis must be modified to fit.
An 8mm Helicoil will screw right into the 10mm clevis thread and makes a perfectly fine adaptor (which is reversible if need be).
Old 03-30-13, 02:08 PM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
ben.farnath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: new zealand
Posts: 804
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Is the booster from an abs equipped fc(mine was) and a non abs(mine is now) any different. Ie the fact I used my abs booster with non abs master and no abs block, will it make a difference? (deleted abs in other words)

Sent from my GT-I9100 using RX7Club
Old 03-31-13, 04:23 AM
  #8  
Full Member

 
Th0m4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Germany/Stuttgart
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have a S4 TII and I had a S5 TII brake booster lying around some time ago. The two brake boosters were a bit different from each other. The biggest difference were the holes for the brakelines in the master cylinder. Is there any bigger master cylinder which would be a direct replacement for the S4 TII one without having to bend new lines?
Old 03-31-13, 07:21 AM
  #9  
Cake or Death?

iTrader: (2)
 
clokker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,249
Received 63 Likes on 53 Posts
Not that I know of.
Old 05-07-13, 06:56 AM
  #10  
Driver

 
The RX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Auburn, Ca
Posts: 25
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know this thread is about a month gone, but I was hoping I could get some feedback on the issue of soft pedal work...

Right, so the back story is as follows. Got car, been doing upgrades. Like... a year ago or so I got Hawk HPS', stainless lines, and I'm using a decent brand DOT4 fluid throughout. The discs on the car were OEM Mazda's (woo), and did me a lot of good, with a lot of stops on them. But about two months ago I finally noticed the beginning of some run out occuring. ****. So, saved up, got PowerSlot Cryo treated rotors, and just installed them yesterday. (Incidentally, I've got the four pot brake option, worth mentioning I suppose, haha).

Took the car out tonight, wondering how it'd all come together, and was met with both good and... unexpected results. I did in fact do a brake flush again. And I kept the same HPS pads, as they had a world of life left. Anywho, on the drive I found that while the pedal travel is extremely linear, it's also quite a bit longer a throw, and "softer" than before. They've definitely got the power to stop, but... the bite I was expecting just isn't there.

Points of note, I did bed them in prior to doing my full review on them. I double checked all my lines, and my flush work. Everything kosher there... I'm maybe thinking that the cryo treatment has created such a smooth finish at the molecular level, that it's going to take a bit to mate properly? But that still doesn't explain the long pedal travel... What's weirder, if I stand on them at a stop, they're solid as a rock. While moving, and approaching a braking zone, if I do a couple quick pedal blips, then the feel/throw is better, but by no means like before. And I'll reiterate the point of no air in the system, this is for sure.

So, longest post over, heh. Ideas?
Old 05-07-13, 09:48 AM
  #11  
version 2.0

iTrader: (17)
 
texFCturboII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 3,590
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
That sounds normal for a boosted system. Isn't it a testing procedure to pump the pedal and see if the pedal gets firmer?
Old 05-07-13, 10:16 AM
  #12  
MECP Certified Installer

 
jjwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mesquite, TX-DFW
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Verts have the same single diaphram booster and master cylinder as the NA coupes.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
The1Sun
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
09-15-15 04:45 PM
The1Sun
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
0
09-07-15 10:21 PM
Tem120
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-07-15 09:53 AM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
09-04-15 06:17 PM



Quick Reply: brake pedal sooooo soft



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.