2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

BLow-off valve for TII

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-10 | 02:56 PM
  #1  
jimmydanny's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Norway
BLow-off valve for TII

I have asked this before, but how is it with open blow-off valves? Like, I have heard because of the mechanical AFM, the car doesn't like open blow-offs, but there is also something with single or dual pistoned valves, and so on.

Anyone know anything about this?
Old 05-29-10 | 04:24 PM
  #2  
Scrims's Avatar
Hide the pinball machine

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: Sammamish, wa
With the AFM, a BOV that vents to atmosphere is not really a great idea, because the ECU has already calculated how much air should be going into the engine, so when the BOV vents, it's not getting the air it thinks it is, and goes really rich. The way that this is overcome is to recirculate the BOV so it vents in back into the air stream at the turbo inlet duct.

I have no idea what single vs dual pistoned valves have anything to do with this, unless I completely missed the mark as to what you are talking about.

Also, a quick search could have told you all this.
Old 05-29-10 | 08:52 PM
  #3  
12AllWays's Avatar
It means 12A all ways^

iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Northern IN
I have ran an open Turbo XS RFL blow off for over 10k miles now without issue on stock ecu. It may make it rich between shifts, but nothing you will notice.
Old 05-30-10 | 06:01 AM
  #4  
Chris Boots's Avatar
I blame the TPS
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: MT
You get FIRE out the exhaust between shifts and revs with an open bov... which I love. Yeah the AFM goes rich for a second and if the exhaust is hot enough it ignites the fuel and shoots a flame... want videos? Doesn't bother me any. I run an old school HKS RS BOV (cause they just don't make them like they used to, huge, high flow and reliable), It doesn't "chirp" "tweet", "whistle" or make any other bird sounds or anything else like say an STI, just "woosh" and the psi is 0 within a second, like a bov should be.
Old 05-30-10 | 08:26 AM
  #5  
florotory's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, Ne
I dont have mine recirculated either and no issues. Mine really doesnt shoot out a flame that often but when it decides to it deffinatley keeps people from tailgating
Old 05-30-10 | 08:49 AM
  #6  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,188
Likes: 438
From: cold
I ran an open BOV (Greddy Type S, oldschool) on Stock ECU and Rtek 1.7. It backfired and shot flames all the time.
Old 05-30-10 | 10:05 AM
  #7  
Grip's Avatar
.................

iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 3
From: Illinois
open bov's with a MAF are not a problem at all, car runs slightly richer between shifts. no harm done.
Old 05-30-10 | 10:10 AM
  #8  
jimmydanny's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Norway
So no problem except making Al Gore angry?`Well, the open ones are like 20$ cheaper here in Norway, ++.

I had a HKS SSQV on my Passat, open. The noise was so loud (I took out the part of the valve which made the noise really high), so I got a friend to make a resirc nipple instead. Just the same amount of noise, so didn't help, but the car became more responsive. Of course, a 97 Passat dont use mechanical AFMs, but rather proper electronical MAFs.

The point was the Passat was not recommended to run open with either, but it worked fine, except the little delay I got between gears because of the lost air.
Old 05-30-10 | 11:28 AM
  #9  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,793
Likes: 119
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by jimmydanny
The point was the Passat was not recommended to run open with either, but it worked fine, except the little delay I got between gears because of the lost air.
But that's not quite fine. A BOV is supposed to relieve pressure in the intake tract to prevent surge and also allow the turbo to continue to pump air into somewhere, theoretically minimizing any lag between shifts. If the AF mixture was screwed up enough to cause a delay between shifts, then that sounds broken.

On the other side, the RX-7 ECU runs so rich by default that it really isn't a big deal. And most FCs are running so poorly at this point on the stock ECU that any lag caused by an open vented BOV is probably not noticeable due to the bad TPS, clogged injectors, etc.

The long and short of it is that open venting a BOV works fine on the FC.
Old 05-30-10 | 12:14 PM
  #10  
jimmydanny's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Norway
If you use an open valve the air that the turbo got in is pushed out again, and it got to suck new air in. But with a recirc the air is just vented into the turbo again, so you get a little bit more air straight after the gearshift. It is barely noticable, but it is there.
Old 07-18-10 | 07:47 PM
  #11  
Bamato's Avatar
S5 T2
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
On this same topic, if I were to purchase a greddy type rs bov, and recirc it, would I still hear it?
Old 07-19-10 | 01:24 PM
  #12  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Rotary Revolutionary
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
You can hear the stock BOV. So yes.
Old 07-19-10 | 02:07 PM
  #13  
KhanArtisT's Avatar
Former FC enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 2
From: Northern VA
People that mention that crap are normally smart asses who want to make a point. I remember my Super Street teacher said some BS like "on cars with vane AFMs the engine will stall after a shift with an atmospheric dump BOV" lol...

In reality you probably won't even be able to notice a difference. I'm with arghx and others on this subject, and believe BOV's are a complete waste of money. No BOV ftw.
Old 07-28-10 | 08:05 AM
  #14  
NI_Racing's Avatar
Racer
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Fl
^ im sure this is a dumb question... but how do you safely run a turbo with no BOV?
Old 07-28-10 | 08:57 AM
  #15  
Bamato's Avatar
S5 T2
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
I think he means no aftermarket BOV's. Ones that vent to atmoshpere.
Old 07-28-10 | 10:51 AM
  #16  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,188
Likes: 438
From: cold
Originally Posted by NI_Racing
^ im sure this is a dumb question... but how do you safely run a turbo with no BOV?
disconnect it and plug the holes. If you still have the stock AFM you may not like the way it drives after that, but I can't say I've done it personally.

I haven't had a functioning blowoff valve in years: https://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo-rx-7s-23/8-months-counting-no-blowoff-valve-884695/ but I have a standalone. I didn't really notice any difference besides the fluttering sound. Turbo hasn't blown up (it is an aftermarket Garrett).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SakeBomb Garage
SakeBomb Garage
9
05-11-20 11:04 AM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
09-05-15 03:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.