300hp+ n/a is it possible?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: n.y.
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
300hp+ n/a is it possible?
im looking for ways to keep my 89 gxl n/a but i want to get 300 or more horse power its already street ported i have a aem cai and my exhaust is straight piped
i wanna keep the high rev n/a but with turbo power
i wanna keep the high rev n/a but with turbo power
#2
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MN
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not really.
the current available super charger's cant even touch the mid-200's.
The only possibility is a finely tuned Periphial Port.
But then daily drivability will virtually be gone. Thats the only way.
(Do a search of you dont know some of these terms)
-a
the current available super charger's cant even touch the mid-200's.
The only possibility is a finely tuned Periphial Port.
But then daily drivability will virtually be gone. Thats the only way.
(Do a search of you dont know some of these terms)
-a
#3
Ga-nome liberator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://www.rx7club.com/rotary-car-performance-77/been-dyno-pp-engine-387634/ 316 rwhp right there.
Unless you have driven a PP port day to day I wouldn't be talking about the driveability of it. Besides it's subjective to each person.
- Steiner
Unless you have driven a PP port day to day I wouldn't be talking about the driveability of it. Besides it's subjective to each person.
- Steiner
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: n.y.
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my car has a newly rebuilt motor with about 15000 miles on it its got tII rotors and housings and its ported pretty agressivly its got way more than my 91 did. oh yea and its got the 2mm apex seals that are supposedly indestructable im looking to get the most power i can out of the n/a
#6
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by 89gxlstrtprt
my car has a newly rebuilt motor with about 15000 miles on it its got tII rotors and housings and its ported pretty agressivly its got way more than my 91 did. oh yea and its got the 2mm apex seals that are supposedly indestructable im looking to get the most power i can out of the n/a
Trending Topics
#10
I am 2Furious
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NJ / Philly
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
straight pipe exhuast? how are you supposed to pass emissions if all your emissions-reducing equipment has been removed? My 7 has a RB cat-back, passes emissions just fine thank you.
#11
Nothin But a G Thang
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my car passed well below the limits here in houston with a high flow cat, emmissions which are nearly as strict as california due to us having the worst pollution. kept stock the fc will pass any emmissions assuming the car is in near perfect running order. i did have to get a new secondary air injection valve and cat b/c mine burned up due to the valve being cloged shut. it almost passed with a broken cat, i dont see how one could say rx7's have terrible emmissions.
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: n.y.
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i live in new york they have pretty hard emissions laws where i live i didnt change over the motor someone else did and i would like to make it a tII again but i dont kno if there is anything that they did to make it n/a that is not reversable
if anyone knows why they would ruin a perfectly good tII to make an n/a and knows what they did to convert id like the info
if anyone knows why they would ruin a perfectly good tII to make an n/a and knows what they did to convert id like the info
#16
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
iTrader: (3)
You can have TII rotors and rotor housings and still have an N/a engine with all the irons and rest of the N/a components. Its just lowered compression and no exhaust port diffusers. If they gave you a TII long block without a turbo then I have no idea what kind of people would make that or for what purpose.
#17
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 89gxlstrtprt
my car has a newly rebuilt motor with about 15000 miles on it its got tII rotors and housings and its ported pretty agressivly its got way more than my 91 did. oh yea and its got the 2mm apex seals that are supposedly indestructable im looking to get the most power i can out of the n/a
SDrotary-FC: Presumably the person you're refering to has an aggressive bridge?
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: n.y.
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont kno i didnt do it im not choosing to run the tII rotors it came that way i just want to make it turbo i havnt taken it apart so i dont kno much more i met the guy who built it he was planing on putting it in his s5 tII (so im assuming that its s5 rotors) but the person i bought the car from bought the motor and had him just throw the thing together n/a
#19
@ pipnorcali
Originally Posted by Snrub
I don't mean to harp, but was there any particular reason that you decided to run the TII rotors? Are you running the S5 or S4 TII rotors?
SDrotary-FC: Presumably the person you're refering to has an aggressive bridge?
SDrotary-FC: Presumably the person you're refering to has an aggressive bridge?
no it is'nt a bridge (not allowed in the series the car runs in) the are motors built for a open wheel series and it made that power on a engine dyno not to the wheels
#20
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I call shenanigans on either the engine dyno or the information then SDrotary-FC.
313hp is just too much to get from a 'normal' sideport engine.
Unless they've done a dodgy and used a quasi bridgeport. Ie one that doesn't separate the whole bridge so as to get around the rules somehow. But that for all intents and purposes is a bridgeport.
Even in one of the most competative motor classes in australia the top teams running rotaries are only just over 300hp with with a bridgeport.. and that is BIG money right there..
313hp is just too much to get from a 'normal' sideport engine.
Unless they've done a dodgy and used a quasi bridgeport. Ie one that doesn't separate the whole bridge so as to get around the rules somehow. But that for all intents and purposes is a bridgeport.
Even in one of the most competative motor classes in australia the top teams running rotaries are only just over 300hp with with a bridgeport.. and that is BIG money right there..
#21
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,791
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes
on
96 Posts
Originally Posted by 89gxlstrtprt
i dont kno i didnt do it im not choosing to run the tII rotors it came that way i just want to make it turbo i havnt taken it apart so i dont kno much more i met the guy who built it he was planing on putting it in his s5 tII (so im assuming that its s5 rotors) but the person i bought the car from bought the motor and had him just throw the thing together n/a
#25
Lives on the Forum
NO street port is going to hit 200 at the wheels.
NO bridge is going to hit 300 at the wheels.
Only a PP is going to hit 300 at the wheels.
This is NORMAL ASPIRATED and NO NOS, NO turbo, NO SC.
-Ted
NO bridge is going to hit 300 at the wheels.
Only a PP is going to hit 300 at the wheels.
This is NORMAL ASPIRATED and NO NOS, NO turbo, NO SC.
-Ted