240sx vs. rx7
#1
240sx vs. rx7
man...is it me or are the rx7s and the old 240 hatchbacks sweet *** cars...not to mention that the 240 is fast...what is stock hp on that thing? i was comin down the highway and one past me so i got beside him and we started racing...i have a N/A 88 but im patiently waiting for my exhaust and intake...hopefully cold...but yea i was beaten three times...but it was fun...after each run my friend in his 2002 SI would go up against him then his cousin in his Golf GTi would go next...i think those 240's might just be my next car
#2
re:
The 240's are fast but not fast enough. Remember that it has truck engine in it. So the torque is what pushes it. The rev limiter is pretty ghey tho. My buddy's 93 240 tops out at 180, i think. There's a way around the limiter, but i dont know what it is. Might be costly as in a modded ECU. Quick speed is a SR20DET swap or a Turbo kit for the existing engine KA24de. I wanted to get a 95 and up 240sx but i found a cheap RX7. I might just fix it up sell it, and move on to the 240sx. I think the stock HP is 140. SR20DET is 200. Correct me if im wrong fellas.
#4
1989-93 240sx ran the KA24D engine (truck engine). Not sure whar the 94-98 ran, but I am alost 100% sure it is still the KA. Now if you are like my roommate, would get a 1990 and drop a 1989-90 S13 SR20DET "Redtop" engine in it. Longer intake runners than the newer "Blacktop", so has greater aftermarket potential then the S15 SR20DET engine, however, the 240SX can accept the S15 drivetrain which includes:225 SR20DET "Blacktop", 6-speed tranny, and viscous LSD. Man, those cars are SWEET!! Nissan is a damn cool company!!
If I didn't have a Rex, I'd have a 1990 240SX, w/ a full S13 conversion.
If I didn't have a Rex, I'd have a 1990 240SX, w/ a full S13 conversion.
#5
#6
my friend has one of these, my N/A with exhaust and intake has no problem taking it time after time, not to mention his tranny has been rebuilt twice already...apparently there was a recall on their transmissions in 1991 and 1992, the synchros would go shortly and then the gears would be grinded to ****...not a bad looking car but i'd take a 7 over a 240 anyday
#7
Spend $3k on a good 1989-93 240SX, swap in a Redtop SR20DET for about $2k in parts, mod it for $1k, and you should have about 300+hp at the wheels. And with more torque than a rotary, you should, if lauched well, take a modded TII.
Trending Topics
#8
sports compact car had an article on how they made a $3000 silvia conversion theres a place in cali where you can get the sr20det engines that was listed in the magazine. the company imports bunches of silvia front clips from wrecks and stuff. dont remember what it was tho..maybe its on their website somewhere.
#11
240's are awesome cars. its one of my top choices if i didnt have a rx7.. but it needs the Sr20det to be fast.. stock hp on the 2.4l is 140 up to 1990 then 155 from 1991 to 1993 i think.
#12
Yeah 240 was a decent looking car, as far as performance goes, they are crap out of the box, if your N/a fc can't take a 240, make sure no one stole a couple of your spark plugs.
There are alot of these cars on the streets where I live, they are being bought up by kids that don't know which way the peak of their ball cap is supposed to point, they add the flash wheels, prerequisite 6" fart can muffler that makes the car sound like a Suzuki RM125 and of course the the 12" sub just to annoy fellow motorists. I take great pride in obliterating them stoplight to stoplight with a 5.0 gm savanna van with 3500 pounds of cargo in it..Considering the 2 very different power to weght ratio's the 240's must have all of 50 rwhp..Max
There are alot of these cars on the streets where I live, they are being bought up by kids that don't know which way the peak of their ball cap is supposed to point, they add the flash wheels, prerequisite 6" fart can muffler that makes the car sound like a Suzuki RM125 and of course the the 12" sub just to annoy fellow motorists. I take great pride in obliterating them stoplight to stoplight with a 5.0 gm savanna van with 3500 pounds of cargo in it..Considering the 2 very different power to weght ratio's the 240's must have all of 50 rwhp..Max
#14
Three spinning triangles
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Been all around this world and still call Texas home (Ft Worth)
Re: Re: 240sx vs. rx7
Originally posted by RETed
Gimme some of that crack you're smoking!
-Ted
Gimme some of that crack you're smoking!
-Ted
#15
two of my friends have S13's 240sx's with 180sx conversions one blacktop one redtop. both have full exhaust, intake and boost controller....... my TII is way faster with stock catback and no boost controller. they ARE EXPENSIVE to build.... its very fun to drive but a little too pricey for me
#16
240sx is cheap and fast. the cost of the car and engine swap only cost around $5-10k depends on what engine you want. I say its one of the best sleepy to build.
redtop: 205hp
s14 blabktop: 235hp
s15 blacktop: 255hp
redtop: 205hp
s14 blabktop: 235hp
s15 blacktop: 255hp
#18
Three spinning triangles
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Been all around this world and still call Texas home (Ft Worth)
Originally posted by daze
redtop: 205hp
s14 blabktop: 235hp
s15 blacktop: 255hp
redtop: 205hp
s14 blabktop: 235hp
s15 blacktop: 255hp
#20
Originally posted by vosko
two of my friends have S13's 240sx's with 180sx conversions one blacktop one redtop. both have full exhaust, intake and boost controller....... my TII is way faster with stock catback and no boost controller. they ARE EXPENSIVE to build.... its very fun to drive but a little too pricey for me
two of my friends have S13's 240sx's with 180sx conversions one blacktop one redtop. both have full exhaust, intake and boost controller....... my TII is way faster with stock catback and no boost controller. they ARE EXPENSIVE to build.... its very fun to drive but a little too pricey for me
Actually this is a big question for me, because I'm choosing between wanting to get a 240sx or an RX-7 (just moved from an island so no car transport)
#22
Yep, actually I hear its a big debate between a turbo KA or an SR since you're actually swapping out a smaller displacement engine Cost is probably cheaper for a turbo KA I'm guessing unless you can do an SR swap first time with no problems.
#23
Full Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee
i've got a '91 nissan truck with the same motor as the 90-93 i think it is 240sx. I dyno'd my truck and it put out 115rwhp and 135ft lbs torque, may not sound like much but that equals out to about 140 at the flywheel considering i had a **** clutch at the time. My truck also had 225,000miles on the original motor
#24
Originally posted by RexRyder
the 240's handle like ****, and it drives like my dad's
84' Toyota Pick up truck
the 240's handle like ****, and it drives like my dad's
84' Toyota Pick up truck
Oh and that SCC SR20DET swap article, the shop they bought the engine from has raised his prices for some reason or another. Weird huh!