2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

200 Hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-05, 03:09 AM
  #76  
i am legendary

 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by WAYNE88N/A
For guys like me that drive "normally" 99.9% of the time, want to maintain the fuel economy of the NA, and only find themselves racing someone maybe once a month (I'm gettin old, ya know, lol) nitrous is the ONLY alternative.

Hey- did we turn this into a nitrous thread, Dub?
Seems like it's turning into that, doesn't it?

Nitrous is a very good, very easy, and fairly cost effective alternative to power moders on a non-turbo block that makes a big difference.
Old 06-15-05, 12:59 PM
  #77  
Ready to Rock

 
ultradef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dDuB
Seems like it's turning into that, doesn't it?

Nitrous is a very good, very easy, and fairly cost effective alternative to power moders on a non-turbo block that makes a big difference.
True, but nitrous is not a great solution in this case because revhi specifically said that he wants to use his car primarily for auto-x and short track racing. If he were drag racing, that would be a different story.

Originally Posted by iceblue
Solid mounts will improve your reaction time / 10ft time however you want to break it down. As to power to the wheels it is not much if any. However your initial toque will be increased b/c they are not absorbed into the mounts. The spring back of the mounts does absolutely nothing. Actually making your car go faster down the road, is the torque and HP the motor produces and not your MM getting you down the road. Indeed it is at least some improvement and been race proven non-the less. You can argue it down or up all you want makes no difference just shows opinions until someone pulls a dyno slip out.
I think you'd probably be better off buying an aluminum flywheel if you're looking to gain power to the wheels by reducing wasted energy. Solid motor mounts? Come on

revhi - I think what Bukwild said is correct for the most part. Except for a few examples, the 200 rwhp N/A is a "myth". Sure people have done it, but not without throwing large amounts of time, money, research, etc. into it. Its not something you can just "bolt on" and all of a sudden you have 200 rwhp. For example - Kahren hit 200 rwhp but designed his own intake manifold and did a lot of tuning, which I'm sure took a lot of time and research. If you want an easy 200 rwhp, then turbo your N/A or do a TII swap...those are "bolt on" mods for the most part.

What it comes down to is that their really isn't a cheap way to make 200 rwhp for your application since nitrous isn't really an option for auto-x. Full (header-back) exhaust, intake, and a standalone EMS (as mentioned, the megasquirt is cheap, but its a DIY kit that requires you to build it from the ground up) will get you close to 200 rwhp, but you're still $1000+ in the hole...and the megasquirt requires A LOT of time and research to build, install, and tune. A TII swap or turbo N/A will cost you even more than that. Good luck.

Last edited by ultradef; 06-15-05 at 01:05 PM.
Old 06-15-05, 02:02 PM
  #78  
i am not a girl

iTrader: (13)
 
Kahren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the car with the custom intake manifold is my own and that did 180whp to date.it has stock ports and an e6k


the other local car is not mine, he has a stock s4 ecu, s5 streetported motor that i built and t2 intake manifold port matched to the 6 port engine (since he eventually wanted to go turbo) and the car put down 195whp but it was running lean up top so i backed off early and we had to leave the dyno untill bigger injectors were put in, i will soon be going back to the dyno with both of these cars to see how much more power i can get out from both of them.

here is a link to my dyno https://www.rx7club.com/time-slips-dyno-128/6-port-dyno-stock-ports-custom-intake-manifold-e6k-358038/

and here is the link to his dyno https://www.rx7club.com/time-slips-dyno-128/na-6port-streetport-dynoed-195whp-update-418805/

Last edited by Kahren; 06-15-05 at 02:05 PM.
Old 06-15-05, 03:58 PM
  #79  
Ready to Rock

 
ultradef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My bad...thanks for clearing that up Kahren.

Impressive numbers nonetheless...I'm glad to see that people are trying to make power with the 6 port. IMO its just not for someone who's looking for the easy route or for someone who is easily discouraged.
Old 06-15-05, 04:10 PM
  #80  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 110 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by EL5Letra
if you carb the 6port and turbo it..it can make more than 200hp...well if you got monyt o convert from fuel injecion to carb...my pals T2 made 301 with stock ports...obviously you wil have to upgrade fuel pump get a manifold a carb, msds's uh you get the point.
Why would you carburete the engine? There's no reason to move back in time. If you're going to replace the fuel system, and you are thinking that a carb is going to save you money, get a Megasquirt.
Old 06-16-05, 07:46 AM
  #81  
Happy Squirter

 
dbgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lyman, SC
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^ I agree w/Aaron. The MegaSquirt will allow you to ditch the AFM and use the built-in MAP sensor for load. I have also read that an S5 TPS can be used for load, but I'm not too sure about the specifics. Either way, you get to remove one of the most restrictive sections of the intake AND tune fuel and ignition (muythaibxr has tested using a stock CAS, stock leading coil, and was recently working on the leading/trailing timing split).

MS forum topic:
http://www.msefi.com/viewtopic.php?t=7544
Old 06-16-05, 08:32 AM
  #82  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 110 Likes on 93 Posts
It's not the loss of the AFM that's the big deal, it's the full fuel control and the freedom to run any injectors/sensors that you want.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zyph3r
Canadian Forum
10
09-16-18 07:14 PM



Quick Reply: 200 Hp?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM.