2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

17" offset for TII?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-03, 08:54 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Little 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
17" offset for TII?

What is the best offset for 17" offset for TII? Front and Rear should different?
How about 17x8 and 17x9, both with 35 offset? Can it fit?
Old 12-22-03, 10:54 PM
  #2  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (4)
 
mrb63083's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,748
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
38's all around and you should be good.
Old 12-22-03, 11:07 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
S13 Slide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Washington
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMO 17x9 +15 all around looks best.
Old 12-22-03, 11:29 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Little 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wanna to use wider tires at rear so I am thinking use 8 at front and 9 at rear? Do you think +35 or +38 all round will looks better?
Old 12-22-03, 11:50 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
S13 Slide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Washington
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there wouldnt be a big differance look wise between +35 and +38...
Old 12-22-03, 11:58 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Little 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Actually this set of rims took off from my friend's FD (He goes 18") 17x8+35 and 17x9+35. Just wondering will it fit for FC too?
Old 12-23-03, 12:13 AM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you shouldn't have a problem with them. ask him if you can test fit them. let us know how they fit so i can use the information for when i replace my stock wheels.

really tho, if you do the math, you want a 25-30mm offset for the 17x8's and 17x9's. this will bring your wheels closer to the fenders but shouldn't be past. any less of an offset and your tires will be past your fender. keep in mind, i haven't tried any rims on my FC, this is strictly going by the numbers.

Last edited by fstrnyou; 12-23-03 at 12:15 AM.
Old 12-23-03, 03:09 AM
  #8  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts
!7" x 8" with an offset between +25mm to +30mm with a 225/45/17 tire work best up front. If you want to be able to rotate tires (front to back), then run the same spec in the rears. If you mind running a stagger (unable to rotate), then you can easily run a 17" x 9" ~+20mm offset in back with a 255/40/17 tire.


-Ted
Old 12-23-03, 06:47 AM
  #9  
Senior Member

 
bkapold@aol.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Minnesota/ California
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have 17 x 9.5 +38mm offset w/ 275 rear.
17 x 9 +35mm offset w/ 235 front.
Old 12-23-03, 09:55 AM
  #10  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,979
Received 58 Likes on 48 Posts
I'd like to know what, if any, modifications were needed to fit the 9" (+35mm offset) on the front. My calculation would indicate the inner rim would be about 7/8" closer to the suspension. I think they would look great, but how do they fit?
Old 12-23-03, 02:30 PM
  #11  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well, you got to remember, the strut angles in as it goes up. so by increasing the rim size, you are essentially making the gap between the rim and strut larger. i don' t know by how much but i think he's really close if not rubbing.

oh, and if you have some good shots of rims on your FC, post them and let us know what the sizes and offsets are. i think that will be the biggest help. i need to be able to see how far the rim is inside the fender, like looking down the side of the car from front to rear, and rear to front.

Last edited by fstrnyou; 12-23-03 at 02:34 PM.
Old 12-23-03, 03:13 PM
  #12  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,979
Received 58 Likes on 48 Posts
Not trying to hijack this post, but I find it interesting installing 9" (+38) rims on the front of an FC.
well, you got to remember, the strut angles in as it goes up. so by increasing the rim size, you are essentially making the gap between the rim and strut larger. i don' t know by how much but i think he's really close if not rubbing.
I do understand, but a 225 50 16 is @ 24.86" in dia. The 235 17, if a 40 series is @ 24.4" in dia. Actually smaller. If it's a 235 45 17 the dia is @ 25.33. I doubt that less than 1/2" is going to make that much difference.
I'd just like more info. I think they would look great.
Old 12-23-03, 08:48 PM
  #13  
The Dude Abides

 
neevosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The tire diameter isn't going to make much of a difference for clearance. It all depends on your suspension and camber settings. I had a 17x8 +40 with a 235/40 up front. With stock suspension it fit no problem. With JIC coilovers it slightly rubbed on the spring perch. Now with my Zeal coilovers they wouldn't fit. I'm running a 6mm spacer now.
Old 12-24-03, 08:38 AM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
bkapold@aol.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Minnesota/ California
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbo nut: The offset on the 9" is 35mm not 38mm....The 38mm is on the 9.5.

Its close up front but it doesn't rub at all....No mods either...I did buzz off metal bur on the coilover casting, but I did that long before these wheels... As Neevosh stated, its all in the camber, offset... The reason so many people are in dis-belief is because not very many people have bought them and or tried them to see the fitment...I got sick of going to the tirerack and getting the run-around on how 8" is the widest they show for a fitment....I said BS!!! We've all seen J-spec cars with fatties on the rear...right?
Actually discount tyre worked with me and ordered every size wheel they offered (width) in the style I decided on...They even sent a 10" which fit on the rear, but it was Enkei-TX's only 10" demo and it would have taken 6 months to get another....Well the 9.5 will support a 275, so I settled... My fronts don't rub at all though...

Call a custom wheel company and get the back spacing and offset specifics to your car and start comparing to the assembly line wheel Specs..
Merry X-mas to all!

Brad
Old 12-24-03, 02:15 PM
  #15  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
actually, camber settings don't mean squat as far as rim to strut clearance goes. now if you're talking about fender clearance then i agree. and even with a 35mm offset, that's just too close for comfort. i don't think i'd have more of an offset than 30 just to be safe. i have 225/45's on my stock TII rims and i don't have but a few millimeters gap between my spring perch and right where my tire meets the rim.

my plans are to have a 17x8 in front with 17x9's in back and 255/40 & 275/40 respectively. or 245/265
Old 12-24-03, 04:05 PM
  #16  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,979
Received 58 Likes on 48 Posts
Its close up front but it doesn't rub at all....No mods either...I did buzz off metal bur on the coilover casting, but I did that long before these wheels...
Brad:
Thanks for the comment. I just didn't believe a 9" would ever fit on the front. They must look great.
Old 12-24-03, 04:22 PM
  #17  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i'd like to see pics please, i might end up with 9's on my front too.
Old 12-24-03, 06:27 PM
  #18  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts
9" +35 up front? I still don't believe it.
We've TRIED a 9" +25 Mahdi's up front with a 225/45/17 tire, and there was like not more than 5mm of clearance. Your set-up would've easily hit the insides. Sure, I didn't go through a whole inventory of wheels just to see what fits, but it's all still based on math - and the math doesn't lie. Maybe we should be comparing backspacing measurements? I know there's some discrepency on offset versus backspacing numbers on rims due to the lip design...


-Ted
Old 12-29-03, 11:39 PM
  #19  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed. I did the math and you need a 30-35 offset for 8" wides to fit. I didn't think there was any way for the 9's to fit with 35 offset.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sethix
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
11-03-17 11:48 PM
MidnightOwl
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
09-25-15 10:24 PM



Quick Reply: 17" offset for TII?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 PM.