2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

!!13 sec S5 N/A!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-03, 11:06 AM
  #26  
casio isn't here.

 
casio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
did NO ONE read that it was done with a g-tech? maybe some of you just really trust those things with all your life. i mean, its obviously pretty fast if the gtech is reading a 13.8, but not a true 1/4 time. but i still don't see whats the big deal except most no one goes very far with an n/a. and everyone who claims anything gets flamed. its a fucked up cycle.
Old 07-22-03, 11:19 AM
  #27  
Senior Member

 
eyeoutthere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Owego NY
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by walterdixon
did anyone read the whole post? in the end he admitted to using a g-tech and said that he may have screwed up the time.
I noticed that also. I doubt he would really run 13’s at the track.
Old 07-22-03, 12:12 PM
  #28  
88 AE

Thread Starter
 
BDoty311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
did NO ONE read that it was done with a g-tech? maybe some of you just really trust those things with all your life. i mean, its obviously pretty fast if the gtech is reading a 13.8, but not a true 1/4 time. but i still don't see whats the big deal except most no one goes very far with an n/a. and everyone who claims anything gets flamed. its a fucked up cycle.
Dont start shooting flames, I posted this BEFORE he posted that it was done with a G-tech. So drop the attitude.
Old 07-22-03, 01:02 PM
  #29  
RIP Icemark

iTrader: (4)
 
j200pruf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Aloha OR
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow BDaoty shuts it down I can't wait to have my car payed off and my new suspension, cuz then I get my intake manifold TB's and Microtech, maybe then I can get into the 13's with-out a G-Tech
Old 07-22-03, 01:28 PM
  #30  
Back from the dead...

 
Drifter101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That ******* rocks!
Old 07-22-03, 01:40 PM
  #31  
wHiTe kNiGhT

 
rx7raca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ct
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so does this mean an NA cant go into the 13s without a standalone?lol

i cant wait to get my engine in and running, to see what times i will get!
Old 07-22-03, 02:24 PM
  #32  
Alcohol Fueled!

iTrader: (2)
 
J-Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hood River oregon
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
All you N/A guys got your hopes up over somebody claiming 13s with a G-Tech. How funny!

Jarrett
Old 07-22-03, 02:29 PM
  #33  
casio isn't here.

 
casio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BDoty311
Dont start shooting flames, I posted this BEFORE he posted that it was done with a G-tech. So drop the attitude.
haha, calm down, man. i wasn't saying "hey BDoty, damn youre a dumb idiot. that was a gtech reading!" the thread was going on and on about a 13 second n/a that was done with a gtech. i wasn't shooting flames. put the extinguisher down. man some people are more sensitive than chicks watching lifetime.
Old 07-22-03, 05:22 PM
  #34  
ALLROTOR

iTrader: (2)
 
85TIIDEVIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oceanside, NY.
Posts: 1,856
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally posted by J-Rat
All you N/A guys got your hopes up over somebody claiming 13s with a G-Tech. How funny!

Jarrett
What's so funny about it... LOL. What times you running with a TURBO....?

It better be at least in the 13's with a statement like that or else your the funny one...?
Old 07-22-03, 07:26 PM
  #35  
Alcohol Fueled!

iTrader: (2)
 
J-Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hood River oregon
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Cause the guy was claiming a 13.8 on a G-tech. Thats funny.

What do my 1/4 mile times have to do with this?
Old 07-22-03, 08:26 PM
  #36  
ALLROTOR

iTrader: (2)
 
85TIIDEVIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oceanside, NY.
Posts: 1,856
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I guess I took it in the wrong text...

But a 13.8 on a G-Tech tells me the guy has aprox a 13 sec car if not VERY CLOSE... so either way, whats so funny...?
Old 07-22-03, 08:33 PM
  #37  
EIT

 
gsracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
13.8 is great for n/a fc's, but in the grand scheme of things....it's not very fast at all. To me that's why it's funny. I run a 13.8@103-104 and my car feels slow to me. Speed is relative.
Old 07-22-03, 09:52 PM
  #38  
just dont care.

iTrader: (6)
 
jacobcartmill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by gsracer
Speed is relative.

G-tech is relative. and it sucks for measuring 1/4 times.

i could go install a g-tech in my 91 GXL and insert my weight totally wrong and squeeze out a 13.9 with no problem. a 13 second pass at a drag strip is what we are all trying for, not a 13 second g-tech pass going downhill on the highway.

Last edited by jacobcartmill; 07-22-03 at 09:54 PM.
Old 07-22-03, 10:23 PM
  #39  
Alcohol Fueled!

iTrader: (2)
 
J-Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hood River oregon
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by jacobcartmill
G-tech is relative. and it sucks for measuring 1/4 times.
That was basically what I was getting at.

The only way I would believe it, is if someone posted slips.
Old 07-22-03, 10:33 PM
  #40  
just dont care.

iTrader: (6)
 
jacobcartmill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by J-Rat
That was basically what I was getting at.

The only way I would believe it, is if someone posted slips.

agreed.
Old 07-22-03, 10:41 PM
  #41  
Senior Member

 
eyeoutthere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Owego NY
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by gsracer
...13.8@103-104 ...
That's a decent MPH figure (the true measure of HP). What are your 60' times?
Old 07-23-03, 12:16 AM
  #42  
EIT

 
gsracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2.3-2.4
Old 07-23-03, 12:19 AM
  #43  
EIT

 
gsracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2.3-2.4

[excuses]

I'm on azeni's, which are great autox tires but super stiff sidewalls suck for launching. My rear shocks are completely blown so I can't drop the clutch, or even ride then drop. I have to slip the clutch off the launch, and I'm still getting used to this car. Before the t2 I drove a gsr, which being torqueless, n/a, and fwd, is launched just a bit differently. [/excuses]

The g-tech's are usually within a few tenths in my experience but tend to give a trap speed 3 or 4 mph to high. But then 13.8 is just barely into the 13's as well, so like everyone has said, get a timeslip then post about being in the 13's.
Old 07-23-03, 01:19 AM
  #44  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,629
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I've ran a 14 flat on a g-tech with my stock port N/A, woo for me...
Old 07-23-03, 09:07 AM
  #45  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
RXTASY1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Right Here!
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Black13B
I didn't see any proof on that website...

Although I'm still impressed, but wheres the proof?
This guy is a 46 year old man. Not some punk that doesn't believe a word anybody says.

He has been drag racing for 25 years. Don't think he would pull our leg on "that website".

That website happens to be the most imformative, non-BS website there is dealing with 2nd. Gen. RX-7's.
If you ever really wanna learn about our cars, you should go there.
It's comprised of a bunch of knowledgable people who would rather help you than flame you.
Old 07-23-03, 09:10 AM
  #46  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
RXTASY1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Right Here!
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by rx7raca
i dont see how that would be possible...i have a friend with....fmic,RB exhaust, tuned,boost controler, some other apexi ****, running like 10 psi or somthing and he is ALMOST in the high 12s, i think hes like 13.1 or somthing im not sure. his engine inside is stock too

but my point is that turbos are very easy to make fast.

NAs jus take little more work, jus tune them and shift MAD FAST
Why isnt that possible?
I watched a guy in a brand new Z06 the other day, run a 14.7!!!!
Slow times in any car are much easier to obtain than fast times!
My car is capable of 11 second time slips. My last few runs were in the low 13's! Why? Because my driving skills suck!
Old 07-23-03, 04:55 PM
  #47  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Maybe we should "standardize" a true test of a "1/4-mile run"?

I propose...

*NO SLICKS, drag radials are ok - slicks are tricky, and they are not a "true" run of a "street car" in my book.&nbsp Slicks can break drivetrain parts, so it's safer to keep the cars off them.&nbsp A high 14-second non-slick NA FC can easily run a 13.xx on a really sticky set of slicks.

*printed timeslip - no timing computers; staring down a christmas tree is a lot harder than dumping the clutch down some back road.

*"street legal" - there's a lot of leeway on a definition, but if it passes the local inspection, I won't bitch much.&nbsp A dedicated race car kinda takes away the spirit of the challenge.



-Ted
Old 07-23-03, 05:28 PM
  #48  
Alcohol Fueled!

iTrader: (2)
 
J-Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hood River oregon
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I agree 100%. Only problem is, anyone can post any timeslip and claim ownership. Hell, I have copies of Soul Assassin's timeslips, so my car no officially runs 9.xx!

There has to be a way to prove ownership of the slip...Any ideas?
Old 07-23-03, 06:28 PM
  #49  
ALLROTOR

iTrader: (2)
 
85TIIDEVIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oceanside, NY.
Posts: 1,856
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally posted by RETed
A high 14-second non-slick NA FC can easily run a 13.xx on a really sticky set of slicks.
If it were that easy wouldn't ALOT more people be in the 13's....

A car with big HP will gain or lose a full second with or without slicks, but not a 14 sec car.

I'd say 2-4 tenths TOPS with the same driver and conditions.

My NITTO 555R's made a big diffrence in my launches and 60ft's (2.0's-1.8's), but certianly not a full second in the 1/4.
Old 07-23-03, 08:42 PM
  #50  
EIT

 
gsracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by RETed
Maybe we should "standardize" a true test of a "1/4-mile run"?

I propose...

*NO SLICKS, drag radials are ok - slicks are tricky, and they are not a "true" run of a "street car" in my book.&nbsp Slicks can break drivetrain parts, so it's safer to keep the cars off them.&nbsp A high 14-second non-slick NA FC can easily run a 13.xx on a really sticky set of slicks.

*printed timeslip - no timing computers; staring down a christmas tree is a lot harder than dumping the clutch down some back road.

*"street legal" - there's a lot of leeway on a definition, but if it passes the local inspection, I won't bitch much.&nbsp A dedicated race car kinda takes away the spirit of the challenge.



-Ted
slicks might drop a high 14 secon fc into the low 14's, but not the 13's IMO.

As far as the timeslip goes, I'd like to see a timeslip too, but just because I trust timing devices at a nhra sanctioned track more so than the ghetto-tech. As far as staring at the christmas tree, I could wait 5 seconds and then drop the clutch, the timer doesn't trip until I move the car, not when the last light goes green.

Street legal takes about 75 percent of the cars on the site off. Honestly how many people on the boards are running cats and the rest of their emissions? I junked mine within the first month of owning the car. My car is emissions legal for 1 day every year, or rather about 2 hours every year.

Also, is fc3s-pro ever going to be back up


Quick Reply: !!13 sec S5 N/A!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 PM.